Re: [webkit-dev] optimising png files in LayoutTests - an experiment

2012-01-25 Thread Jarred Nicholls
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Elliot Poger wrote: > In deciding whether to just let the PNGs get shrunk over time or to do a > pass over all of them at once, I think we should decide what we are trying > to optimize for. (Download time for initial checkout of the webkit tree? For git users,

Re: [webkit-dev] optimising png files in LayoutTests - an experiment

2012-01-25 Thread Elliot Poger
In deciding whether to just let the PNGs get shrunk over time or to do a pass over all of them at once, I think we should decide what we are trying to optimize for. (Download time for initial checkout of the webkit tree? Time for existing developers to update their trees? Storage space in the re

Re: [webkit-dev] does anyone use the advanced --print options to new-run-webkit-tests besides me?

2012-01-25 Thread Adam Barth
The EWS configures some custom logging: http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/common/config/ports.py#L269 Adam On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote: > Hi all, > > new-run-webkit-tests, in addition to the --verbose flag, offers the > ability to turn on or off

Re: [webkit-dev] does anyone use the advanced --print options to new-run-webkit-tests besides me?

2012-01-25 Thread Robert Hogan
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 21:09:35 Dirk Pranke wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Robert Hogan wrote: > > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 07:38:07 Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > >> On somewhat related note, can we simplify the output of > >> new-run-webkit-tests on bots? It's way too noisy as is.

Re: [webkit-dev] optimising png files in LayoutTests - an experiment

2012-01-25 Thread Dirk Pranke
I like the idea. I'm not sure I agree w/ Adam that I'd roll the code into DRT, insofar as I don't know how big it is and I would definitely want the code shared across all of the DRT implementations. I'd probably also do a pass over all of the existing PNGs at some point rather than wait for them t

Re: [webkit-dev] does anyone use the advanced --print options to new-run-webkit-tests besides me?

2012-01-25 Thread Dirk Pranke
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Robert Hogan wrote: > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 07:38:07 Ryosuke Niwa wrote: >> On somewhat related note, can we simplify the output of >> new-run-webkit-tests on bots? It's way too noisy as is. Maybe hide all >> DEBUG information? >> > > It would be nice if th

Re: [webkit-dev] Introducing run-perf-tests and Adding Performance Bots

2012-01-25 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
FYI, if you have any complaints or suggestions, please file a bug and block https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77037. Best, Ryosuke Niwa Software Engineer Google Inc. On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > ...and Chromium Mac Release (Perf) has been added to build.webkit.o

Re: [webkit-dev] Mac and Chromium Mac EWS

2012-01-25 Thread Eric Seidel
It's also possible that the NRWT "don't peg the machine" heuristics are failing for the EWS bots. You'd have to SSH in to know. But if you see it running too many DRT processes (or too many associated Python processes) we can change the heuristic: http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/Tools/Script

Re: [webkit-dev] Mac and Chromium Mac EWS

2012-01-25 Thread Adam Barth
>From the logs posted to queues.webkit.org, it looked like the problem was that more than 30 tests were failing on those machines. To run the test on these machines, we'll need substantially fewer than 30 failures. For example, I think the Chromium Linux EWS has something like 5 persistent failur

Re: [webkit-dev] Mac and Chromium Mac EWS

2012-01-25 Thread Lucas Forschler
I did a bit of investigation on the EWS bots. They seem to be dying rather quickly, and I've been unable to ssh into them. I connected up to one locally and the cpu was pegged and the machine was unresponsive. I couldn't even open a terminal session. I've had to reboot them with a power cycl

Re: [webkit-dev] Mac and Chromium Mac EWS

2012-01-25 Thread Adam Barth
+lforschler 2012/1/25 Osztrogonac Csaba : > Adam Barth írta: >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Osztrogonac Csaba >> wrote: >>> >>> Something happened with Mac EWS again and now there are 375 >>> stucked patch. Could anyone from Apple check and fix it? >> >> Lucas and I have been working to enab

Re: [webkit-dev] does anyone use the advanced --print options to new-run-webkit-tests besides me?

2012-01-25 Thread Dirk Pranke
Something along those lines is on my to-do list, yes. -- Dirk On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > On somewhat related note, can we simplify the output of new-run-webkit-tests > on bots? It's way too noisy as is. Maybe hide all DEBUG information? > > - Ryosuke > > On Tue, Jan

Re: [webkit-dev] Introducing run-perf-tests and Adding Performance Bots

2012-01-25 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
...and Chromium Mac Release (Perf) has been added to build.webkit.org: http://build.webkit.org/waterfall?show=Chromium%20Mac%20Release%20(Perf) See graphs on http://webkit-perf.appspot.com - Ryosuke On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > Hi WebKittens, > > *Executive Summary* >

Re: [webkit-dev] Mac and Chromium Mac EWS

2012-01-25 Thread Osztrogonac Csaba
Hi, Adam Barth írta: On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Osztrogonac Csaba wrote: Something happened with Mac EWS again and now there are 375 stucked patch. Could anyone from Apple check and fix it? Lucas and I have been working to enable running the tests on the mac-ews. Unfortunately, there