On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Elliott Sprehn espr...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Anders Carlsson ander...@apple.comwrote:
...
+1
From what I’ve heard, the Shadow DOM changes have negatively impacted the
packability of the DOM code which is unfortunate. I’m
He probably refers to 1.6.3 of WebKitGTK+, the confusion comes from the fact
that WebKitGTK+ calls themselves and their library 'WebKit' on Linux with no
attempt of disambiguation.
He needs to update though. I think they are at 1.11 and 2.0 now.
`Allan
On Tuesday 30 April 2013, Filip Pizlo
El mar, 30-04-2013 a las 09:11 +0200, Allan Sandfeld Jensen escribió:
He probably refers to 1.6.3 of WebKitGTK+, the confusion comes from the fact
that WebKitGTK+ calls themselves and their library 'WebKit' on Linux with no
attempt of disambiguation.
right :-( but we fixed that already, our
Hi Ryosuke,
I don't have time at the moment. But I remain interested in WebKit and am
reading the
emails as much as possible. I am thinking I'll have more time this summer for
WebKit.
Thanks for following up. I have given the issue considerable thought. Not
practical for
me at the moment.
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen k...@carewolf.comwrote:
He probably refers to 1.6.3 of WebKitGTK+, the confusion comes from the
fact
that WebKitGTK+ calls themselves and their library 'WebKit' on Linux with
no
attempt of disambiguation.
I doubt it. The confusion
Thanks for the follow up, Karen.
- R. Niwa
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Karen Shaeffer
shaef...@neuralscape.comwrote:
Hi Ryosuke,
I don't have time at the moment. But I remain interested in WebKit and am
reading the
emails as much as possible. I am thinking I'll have more time this
On Tuesday 30 April 2013, Carlos Garcia Campos wrote:
El mar, 30-04-2013 a las 09:11 +0200, Allan Sandfeld Jensen escribió:
He probably refers to 1.6.3 of WebKitGTK+, the confusion comes from the
fact that WebKitGTK+ calls themselves and their library 'WebKit' on
Linux with no attempt of
Hi there,
Due to the move from one office to a another, our network infra-structure
here will be down for the next 3 or 4 days.
I won't be able to keep the github mirror in sync with
git.webkit.orgduring this period, but it will be back to normality
next Monday, May 6th.
Best regards,
Jesus
I could have sworn I saw someone in another thread post that they were
interested in taking over maintenance of the binding generators (not
necessarily relating to a massive rewrite, just for ongoing maintenance, was my
impression). But I can't find that email at all now.
Does anyone know who
Hello.
As discussed before, Khronos has been working on a specification for WebCL,
a JavaScript API that exposes GPUs and multi-core processors for intensive
compute tasks. The latest version of the working draft is available here:
[1].
Over the past weeks, some discussion involving WebCL took
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Antonio Gomes toniki...@webkit.org wrote:
At this time, I would like to contribute our WebCL prototype
implementation [4] to WebKit.org.
Feature would be defined behind a ENABLE(WEBCL) feature flag, and work
will be tracked
Over the past weeks, some discussion involving WebCL took place in this
mailing list ([2]), when some concerns were raised, and to which I later on
tried to address in [3].
I believe your answer in [3] to the security problems posed by WebCL was that a
standards group is working on a
Before i saw any patches landed i would expect the specification to state
exactly what kernel features are allowed and required.
Additionally the specification language of the security section is fairly weak
- 4.2 doesn't say how CORS will be used to achieve security. Presumably WebCL
just
13 matches
Mail list logo
