On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Benjamin Poulain wrote:
> On 10/20/13, 9:07 AM, Antti Koivisto wrote:
> > Ignoring other aspects of this, the idea of making attribute name an
> > enumeration is somewhat distasteful. It will require ugly special
> > parsing. The platform has plenty of attribute v
On 10/20/13, 9:07 AM, Antti Koivisto wrote:
> Ignoring other aspects of this, the idea of making attribute name an
> enumeration is somewhat distasteful. It will require ugly special
> parsing. The platform has plenty of attribute values that are lists already.
I was thinking the same thing last n
Ignoring other aspects of this, the idea of making attribute name an
enumeration is somewhat distasteful. It will require ugly special parsing.
The platform has plenty of attribute values that are lists already.
antti
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> My initial im
Le 20 oct. 2013 à 14:39, Yoav Weiss a écrit :
> On Oct 20, 2013 11:31 AM, "PERIER Romain" wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> > srcset is not complicated enough for a web developer? why do you want to
> > add complexity for the developer ? The srcset specification already convers
> > DRP switching and
On Oct 20, 2013 11:31 AM, "PERIER Romain" wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> srcset is not complicated enough for a web developer? why do you want to
add complexity for the developer ? The srcset specification already convers
DRP switching and viewport
The reasoning behind the new proposal was detailed by Joh
Hi all,
srcset is not complicated enough for a web developer? why do you want to
add complexity for the developer ? The srcset specification already convers
DRP switching and viewport (not implemented yet, but it is planned, it is
in my todo list)
why don't you propose improvements to the origina
6 matches
Mail list logo
