Re: [webkit-dev] update GCC version?

2017-01-09 Thread Alberto Garcia
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 04:39:44PM +0100, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: > I strongly oppose to do (a). Also, it is false that Debian doesn't > take our updates. They take our updates in the backports repository > for stable. The main reason why that happens is that the WebKitGTK+ stable

Re: [webkit-dev] update GCC version?

2017-01-09 Thread Alex Christensen
> On Jan 9, 2017, at 7:39 AM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez > wrote: > > On 09/01/17 01:09, Michael Catanzaro wrote: >> On Sun, 2017-01-08 at 18:59 +0100, z...@falconsigh.net wrote: >>> For the record, GCC 5 has complete C++14 support. The current >>> requirement is 4.9, so the

Re: [webkit-dev] update GCC version?

2017-01-09 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
09.01.2017, 20:53, "Michael Catanzaro" : > On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 16:56 +0100, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: >>  Can you please explain how you reach that conclusion? >>  Do you have any data to back up such claim? > > No, I don't have data, but it seems extremely naive

Re: [webkit-dev] update GCC version?

2017-01-09 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 16:56 +0100, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: > Can you please explain how you reach that conclusion? > Do you have any data to back up such claim? No, I don't have data, but it seems extremely naive to assume that any significant subset of users use backports. It is not

Re: [webkit-dev] update GCC version?

2017-01-09 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 09/01/17 16:47, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 16:39 +0100, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: >> I strongly oppose to do (a). Also, it is false that Debian doesn't >> take >> our updates. They take our updates in the backports repository for >> stable. > > Nobody uses that.

Re: [webkit-dev] update GCC version?

2017-01-09 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 16:39 +0100, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: > I strongly oppose to do (a). Also, it is false that Debian doesn't > take > our updates. They take our updates in the backports repository for > stable. Nobody uses that. Users expect to receive security updates in the

Re: [webkit-dev] update GCC version?

2017-01-09 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 16:39 +0100, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: > Another idea is: (c) Drop the "one year after the release" > requirement. > Which means that we could update to minimum GCC version to 5.3 (the > one > in last Ubuntu LTS) when Debian 9 is released (which hopefully is >

Re: [webkit-dev] update GCC version?

2017-01-09 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
09.01.2017, 18:47, "Michael Catanzaro" : > On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 16:39 +0100, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: >>  I strongly oppose to do (a). Also, it is false that Debian doesn't >>  take >>  our updates. They take our updates in the backports repository for >>  

Re: [webkit-dev] update GCC version?

2017-01-09 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 09/01/17 01:09, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Sun, 2017-01-08 at 18:59 +0100, z...@falconsigh.net wrote: >> For the record, GCC 5 has complete C++14 support. The current >> requirement is 4.9, so the bump would be minimal. >> https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html#cxx14 > We would need to

Re: [webkit-dev] Thread naming policy in WebKit

2017-01-09 Thread Yusuke SUZUKI
Thank you for your suggestions! Based on our discussion, I've uploaded the patch[1] :) [1]: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166678 Regards, Yusuke Suzuki On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Yusuke SUZUKI wrote: > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Maciej Stachowiak