Sounds good to me.Chris DumezOn Oct 5, 2022, at 9:04 PM, Kirsling, Ross via webkit-dev wrote:
I've always kind of liked that `for (;;)` doesn't involve an explicit constant, but I too like consistency even more. :)
From: Ryosuke Niwa via webkit-dev
Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2022 1:01:01
I've always kind of liked that `for (;;)` doesn't involve an explicit constant,
but I too like consistency even more. :)
From: Ryosuke Niwa via webkit-dev
Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2022 1:01:01 PM
To: Yusuke Suzuki ; Tim Nguyen ;
WebKit Development
Subject:
I do prefer for (;;) because of less typing but if the existing code mostly
uses while (true) then we should go with it.
> On Oct 5, 2022, at 8:58 PM, Yusuke Suzuki via webkit-dev
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> -Yusuke
>
>> On Oct 5, 2022, at 5:07 PM, Tim Nguyen via webkit-dev
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
+1
-Yusuke
> On Oct 5, 2022, at 5:07 PM, Tim Nguyen via webkit-dev
> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> The WebKit codebase has an inconsistent mix of `while (true)` and `for (;;)`.
> Given 2/3 of the usages are `while (true)` and only 1/3 is `for (;;)` from
> code search, I would suggest
Hi everyone,
The WebKit codebase has an inconsistent mix of `while (true)` and `for (;;)`.
Given 2/3 of the usages are `while (true)` and only 1/3 is `for (;;)` from code
search, I would suggest enforcing `while (true)`. I also think it is generally
more explicit and readable than `for (;;)`.
5 matches
Mail list logo