definitely not keen on keeping
the issues unaddressed.
Cheers,
Zan
Great Wayland support seems like an important target for WebKit on Linux.
Do you know what are the plans for GTK and EFL?
Benjamin
On 12/9/14 7:44 AM, Žan Doberšek wrote:
Hi,
now with proper formatting, Igalia is happy
target for WebKit on Linux.
Do you know what are the plans for GTK and EFL?
Benjamin
On 12/9/14 7:44 AM, Žan Doberšek wrote:
Hi,
now with proper formatting, Igalia is happy to announce the Wayland port
of WebKit.
This port avoids using traditional GUI toolkits in favor of directly
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Žan Doberšek zandober...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Gyuyoung Kim gyuyoung@webkit.org
wrote:
Hello,
Do you know what are the plans for GTK and EFL?
As far as I know, EFL community has tried to support wayland. Thus some
folks
Hi,
Igalia is happy to announce the Wayland port of WebKit.
This port avoids using traditional GUI toolkits in favor of directly
operating with the Wayland display protocol. Leveraging the WebKit2
multi-process architecture, the UIProcess is implemented as a shared
library and loaded by the
and adding support for
additional devices. As with all open-source projects, contributions are
welcome.
Regards,
Zan Dobersek
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Žan Doberšek zandober...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Igalia is happy to announce the Wayland port of WebKit.
This port avoids using traditional
The GTK port does not support building and running with FTL at this point,
though it is planned to at least experiment with it.
Cheers,
Zan
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote:
First of all, we only support the FTL on Darwin - the Linux support is
highly
Hi.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Dan Bernstein m...@apple.com wrote:
Hi everyone, and especially EFL and GTK contributors!
In preparation for changing PLATFORM(MAC) to be false when building for
iOS, I have been reviewing usage of PLATFORM(MAC) throughout our
codebase. Some of these
There are still outstanding and unresolved issues on the GTK and EFL ports
that are reported in bug #12.
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12
The Apple Win7 builder is also having problems after the merge.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Michael Saboff msab...@apple.com wrote:
The GTK port also disables accelerated compositing at build-time when
building specifically for the Wayland windowing target.
Adding AC support for this configuration is planned, but a stub
implementation can be used as well until then.
Cheers,
Zan
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Martin
There's a PPA available for Ubuntu 12.04 that provides both GCC 4.7 and 4.8.
Is that an option?
Cheers,
Zan
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Osztrogonác Csaba o...@inf.u-szeged.huwrote:
Hi,
is there any plan to use more C++11 featurese not mentioned here?
I just ask it, because many of
These types of loops don't appear to be available in MSVC 2010, which AFAIK
still needs to be supported.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/vstudio/hh567368.aspx
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Sergio Villar Senin svil...@igalia.comwrote:
As the project steadily moves to C++11 I was
As you've probably already discovered for yourself by now, the GTK and EFL
ports enable the feature when building through build-webkit.
Thanks for hacking on this.
Cheers,
Zan
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Brady Eidson beid...@apple.com wrote:
Hey all,
Is anybody living in trunk with
The GTK, Qt and EFL ports were originally mentioned in this thread as the
ports that could share much of the POSIX- or GLib-specific code. That's as
close as they come to the new Nix port which would also use this code.
The three ports are heavily tied to their respective toolkits. They could
Hi,
the MemoryInfo interface[1] is currently exposed in window.console[2] and
window.performace[3] despite not being standardized or in process of
standardization by any spec. It's also only partially functional under the
JSC bindings as the jsHeapSizeLimit attribute returns an undefined
GoogleURL seems Chromium-specific, i.e. WTF_USE_GOOGLEURL is only defined
for Chromium in Source/WebCore/config.h.
Regards,
-Z
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 4, 2013, at 1:39 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen k...@carewolf.com
wrote:
On Thursday 04
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
I'm also confused by the fact VHSOutput interface has a
method, streamToYouTube, that specifically supports one website. Are we
expecting to add methods like streamToDailyMotion, streamToUStream, etc...?
I'd prefer coming
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Robert Hogan li...@roberthogan.net wrote:
On Thursday, 21 March 2013, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Robert Hogan li...@roberthogan.netwrote:
On Thursday, 21 March 2013, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
I used to pull results from the bots where
Hi all,
I'm experiencing problems when accessing https://lists.webkit.org - namely,
opening the site reports that a bug was hit inside Mailman.
Probably related, I'm not getting any traffic from the webkit-unassigned
list since yesterday ~8:40 AM PDT. Luckily webkit-dev traffic seems
unaffected.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
I think Adam's old plan for the Platform directory was to migrate from
WebCore/platform piece-by-piece, starting with related groups of classes
that are already free of layering violations. That seems like a sensible
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Jesus Sanchez-Palencia je...@webkit.orgwrote:
Hi,
2013/2/28 Darin Adler da...@apple.com:
To do this, we need to eliminate dependencies from the platform
directory to the rest of WebCore.
At this time, we are far from that. Many dependencies on the DOM
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
There may be a misunderstand of what the “platform layer” is.
We should not move all platform-specific files into the platform
directory! Please do not make the changes in bug 110330 until we have
discussed this.
The idea
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org wrote:
I wish it were easy to work on feature branches.
We have no good solution for features. For one-patch features, you do them
on your own. For larger, you maybe use github or most likely you just land
on trunk behind a
Hi all,
this is just a quick note about the recent changes to the Autotools
build system (used by the GTK port) regarding the addition of new
features.
When adding feature defines to various build system-specific files,
the Autotools build system now lists the feature defines in
The 1.10 branch doesn't enable CSS3 flexbox support by default. To use
-webkit-flex you have to recompile WebKitGTK+ with CSS3 flexbox enabled,
i.e. passing --enable-css3-flexbox to the configure script.
http://trac.webkit.org/browser/releases/WebKitGTK/webkit-1.10/configure.ac#L1010
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa rak...@webkit.orgwrote:
Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org writes:
So, it seems like WK1 and WK2 keywords might be useful. However, I
don't really want to add more divergence between ports, so it would be
nice to have everyone agree to
PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Žan Doberšek zandober...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi WebKitties,
I'd like to see in what scale the --test-list option in NRWT is used and
whether anyone would object a change in how its usage behaves.
Currently
Hi WebKitties,
I'd like to see in what scale the --test-list option in NRWT is used and
whether anyone would object a change in how its usage behaves.
Currently the test gathering takes into account any paths that were passed
in through the command line and any paths listed in the file to which
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Dominik Röttsches
dominik.rottsc...@intel.com wrote:
Hi Dirk,
On 08/22/2012 10:49 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote:
The Chromium canaries now exit after 5000 failures or 1000
crashes/timeouts.
Can the failure limit be increased to 1 for example? Levi/Emil were
Perhaps one option of doing such a huge rebaseline might be the following:
1. Get the bots for the affected port into a green state.
2. Add temporary expectations for every LayoutTests/ subdirectory and
perhaps for subdirectories of LayoutTests/fast, LayoutTests/svg and
LayoutTests/editing as
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Ken Kania kka...@chromium.org wrote:
The WebDriver w3c spec http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-webdriver-20120710/ was
recently published as a first public working draft. The primary goal of
the API is to enable website testing from a user's perspective (finding
I think it would suffice to replace all the FAIL occurrences with TEXT,
except for the failing reftests - those should have FAIL turned into IMAGE.
Gtk bots don't run pixel tests yet so any other IMAGE failures could
perhaps be addressed at later time.
I'd like some approval on this from the
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Dominik Röttsches
dominik.rottsc...@intel.com wrote:
Andrei,
On 05/25/2012 02:43 AM, Andrei Bucur wrote:
Ojan,
As Simon states, some repaint tests will likely not be possible to write
correctly as ref tests, but some of them I think they fit very well
Hi,
to keep the thread count low, I'll borrow this one and request for the
EditBugs permission myself.
The email address is zandober...@gmail.com
Thanks in advance!
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org wrote:
Done.
% webkit-patch add-users-to-groups
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Vineet Chaudhary rgf...@motorola.comwrote:
All of them returns type JSArray for (JS engine) and V8Arrays for the
(V8 engine).
I have wip attached in the bug ,modifying CodeGenerator for JS and V8 to
auto generate bindings which works fine fine.
But it fails
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Jesus Sanchez-Palencia je...@webkit.orgwrote:
A Qt WebKit1 performance bot was added last week, sorry for the late
announcement.
If I'm not mistaken, currently run-perf-tests works with DRT only, but
what if we would like to make it work with WTR as well so we
35 matches
Mail list logo
