Re: [webkit-dev] Rewriting binding code generator, maybe?

2013-04-30 Thread Joe Mason
I could have sworn I saw someone in another thread post that they were interested in taking over maintenance of the binding generators (not necessarily relating to a massive rewrite, just for ongoing maintenance, was my impression). But I can't find that email at all now. Does anyone know who

[webkit-dev] FrameLoader::stopAllLoaders and sync XHR

2013-04-22 Thread Joe Mason
I'm trying to debug a deadlock on exit in a BlackBerry app that uses webkit (which is pretty hard to reproduce, so I don't have a cut-down test case yet). Right now my suspicions are on this behaviour: a synchronous XMLHttpRequest starts loading (from a script running in the main frame)

Re: [webkit-dev] Parallel JavaScript: Why a separate ParallelArray types

2013-04-15 Thread Joe Mason
From: webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org [webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org] on behalf of Filip Pizlo [fpi...@apple.com] Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 12:17 PM To: Ian Hickson Cc: dpra...@chromium.org; Benjamin Poulain; webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Parallel

Re: [webkit-dev] Parallel JavaScript: Why a separate ParallelArray types

2013-04-15 Thread Joe Mason
From: webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org [webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org] on behalf of Maciej Stachowiak [m...@apple.com] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 10:05 PM To: Filip Pizlo Cc: Benjamin Poulain; webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org; dpra...@chromium.org Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Parallel

Re: [webkit-dev] Cleaning House

2013-04-04 Thread Joe Mason
From: webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org [webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org] on behalf of Eric Seidel [e...@webkit.org] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 9:41 AM To: Geoffrey Garen Cc: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org Development Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Cleaning House I considered posting

Re: [webkit-dev] Proposal: WTF HashMap iterators to use key/value instead first/second

2012-08-29 Thread Joe Mason
I'm in favour of this change, as WTF::HashMap is not std::map and having the interface be almost like std::map in some ways, but totally unlike it in other ways, is more confusing than a clean break would be. From: webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org

Re: [webkit-dev] Proposal for coding guidelines: Do not use fall-through switch cases inside #ifdef's

2012-08-17 Thread Joe Mason
From: webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org [webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org] on behalf of Bruno Abinader [brunoabina...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 12:32 PM To: WebKit Development Subject: [webkit-dev] Proposal for coding guidelines: Do not use fall-through switch cases

Re: [webkit-dev] Not authorized to access Bugzillia

2012-08-08 Thread Joe Mason
Security bugs are restricted so that security holes aren't made public until they're fixed. From: webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org [webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org] on behalf of talking1...@gmail.com [talking1...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012

Re: [webkit-dev] Do we need a webkitBackground property for XMLHttpRequest?

2012-07-30 Thread Joe Mason
From: aba...@gmail.com [aba...@gmail.com] on behalf of Adam Barth [aba...@webkit.org] There is no such thing as pushing to trunk for Chromium. All development happens on trunk. That sounds like a regression. I'll follow up with the networking folks. Thanks! Mind keeping us up to date

Re: [webkit-dev] Do we need a webkitBackground property for XMLHttpRequest?

2012-07-25 Thread Joe Mason
From: webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org [webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org] on behalf of Adam Barth [aba...@webkit.org] The network stack folks did a round of removing auth dialogs for subresources a while back. I'm not sure why they didn't remove the dialog from XHR. It's possible

Re: [webkit-dev] Do we need a webkitBackground property for XMLHttpRequest?

2012-07-25 Thread Joe Mason
From: webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org [webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org] on behalf of Brady Eidson [beid...@apple.com] I think there are corporate/financial apps that would break if this was policy. Any idea which? Joe

Re: [webkit-dev] Do we need a webkitBackground property for XMLHttpRequest?

2012-07-24 Thread Joe Mason
From: webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org [webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org] on behalf of Adam Barth [aba...@webkit.org] Do you know why the chromium has not cancel auth dialog for XHR? Is this the main reason? The network stack folks did a round of removing auth dialogs for

Re: [webkit-dev] Pointers and self-documenting code

2012-07-06 Thread Joe Mason
From: Filip Pizlo [fpi...@apple.com] Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 4:52 PM To: Joe Mason Cc: WebKit Development ‎[webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org]‎ Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Pointers and self-documenting code It's not at all clear that this is correct. Is it correct for the font size

Re: [webkit-dev] Dropping support of old WebSocket protocol

2012-03-16 Thread Joe Mason
Totally on board with this. From: webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org [webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org] on behalf of Ryosuke Niwa [rn...@webkit.org] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 2:06 PM To: Yuta Kitamura Cc: WebKit Development Subject: Re: [webkit-dev]

Re: [webkit-dev] Moving to Git?

2012-03-10 Thread Joe Mason
: On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.orgmailto:rn...@webkit.org wrote: On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Joe Mason jma...@rim.commailto:jma...@rim.com wrote: This is only slightly more complicated I'd say astoundingly more complicated because of the fact that you're unapplying

Re: [webkit-dev] Moving to Git?

2012-03-08 Thread Joe Mason
It seems to me that there's no need to use multiple local branches in git if you find it confusing - it's an additional feature, but I don't see anything that requires it. What workflow do you have that requires you to have multiple branches locally in git, and how do you solve it in svn

Re: [webkit-dev] Moving to Git?

2012-03-08 Thread Joe Mason
. Unless you have a lock based source control system you'll have to resolve conflicts. On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Joe Mason jma...@rim.com wrote: It seems to me that there's no need to use multiple local branches in git if you find it confusing - it's an additional feature, but I don't see

Re: [webkit-dev] Moving to Git?

2012-03-08 Thread Joe Mason
if they're starting from the same point. Which makes them not incredibly useful. From: ryosuke.n...@gmail.com [ryosuke.n...@gmail.com] on behalf of Ryosuke Niwa [rn...@webkit.org] Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 4:25 PM To: Joe Mason Cc: Hugo Parente Lima; webkit

Re: [webkit-dev] Adding meta name=referrer to WebCore

2012-03-06 Thread Joe Mason
What happens if this extra plumbing isn't one? Is the tag just ignored? From: webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org [webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org] on behalf of Jochen Eisinger [joc...@chromium.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 10:58 AM To: WebKit

Re: [webkit-dev] Adding meta name=referrer to WebCore

2012-03-06 Thread Joe Mason
Yes, thank you. From: eisin...@google.com [eisin...@google.com] on behalf of Jochen Eisinger [joc...@chromium.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 11:38 AM To: Joe Mason Cc: WebKit Development Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Adding meta name=referrer to WebCore

Re: [webkit-dev] Changing the implementation of KURL

2012-01-28 Thread Joe Mason
-Original Message- From: webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org [mailto:webkit-dev- boun...@lists.webkit.org] On Behalf Of Adam Barth Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2012 3:20 AM To: Darin Fisher Cc: Benjamin Poulain; WebKit Development Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Changing the implementation

Re: [webkit-dev] Changing the implementation of KURL

2012-01-28 Thread Joe Mason
-Original Message- From: webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org [mailto:webkit-dev- boun...@lists.webkit.org] On Behalf Of Maciej Stachowiak Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2012 7:08 PM To: Brett Wilson Cc: Benjamin Poulain; WebKit Development Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Changing the

Re: [webkit-dev] Top 100 sites browsing tests proprosal

2012-01-23 Thread Joe Mason
I don't think this needs to be done by every developer on every checkin. It could be done by the buildbots daily, and whenever a crash is found, somebody would need to find the cause and turn it into a real regression test for later. The fact that the web sites change over time isn't

Re: [webkit-dev] Top 100 sites browsing tests proprosal

2012-01-23 Thread Joe Mason
People run test builds against live servers by hand all the time. As long as we don't do it too often, I don't see a problem. Especially as this list would be taken from a list of top 100 web sites, which presumably would each be big enough to handle the traffic. -Original Message-

Re: [webkit-dev] Incremental steps towards moving WebCore/platform out of WebCore

2011-12-15 Thread Joe Mason
The BlackBerry port uses BlackBerry::Platform for its system libraries - it wouldn't surprise me if some of our files in the platform dirs have using BlackBerry so they can just use Platform::symbol instead of BlackBerry::Platform::symbol in the source. Shouldn't be hard to sort out, though.

Re: [webkit-dev] How to use ASSERT_NO_EXCEPTION

2011-12-15 Thread Joe Mason
-Original Message- From: webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org [mailto:webkit-dev- boun...@lists.webkit.org] On Behalf Of Darin Adler Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 11:37 AM To: WebKit Development Subject: [webkit-dev] How to use ASSERT_NO_EXCEPTION Those same functions are often

Re: [webkit-dev] URL validating process in WebKit

2011-12-13 Thread Joe Mason
If you are using webkit to author a browser, rather than making changes to webkit itself, you should ask questions on webkit-h...@lists.webkit.org. Assuming you're writing code in a layer that has access to KURL, just pass your string to KURL and call isValid(). -Original Message-

Re: [webkit-dev] Removing support for the RVCT compiler

2011-12-12 Thread Joe Mason
Yes, Blackberry uses RVCT (4.1 currently, so I believe 2.2 workarounds can be removed from our point of view.) -Original Message- From: webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org [mailto:webkit-dev- boun...@lists.webkit.org] On Behalf Of Simon Hausmann Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 6:47

Re: [webkit-dev] Removing Support for Python 2.5

2011-11-07 Thread Joe Mason
Has there been any thought of moving to /usr/bin/env python for systems with python installed in a different path? -Original Message- From: webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org [mailto:webkit-dev- boun...@lists.webkit.org] On Behalf Of Adam Barth Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 4:36

Re: [webkit-dev] Dropping support for WML?

2011-04-13 Thread Joe Mason
Blackberry needs to continue to support WML, but we are using our own (legacy) code as a plugin, so removing it from webkit is mostly fine with us. We just use two pieces of the WML code, to deal with the different loading model required by WML: In FrameLoader::shouldReload: // All WML

Re: [webkit-dev] about QtWebKit documentation

2011-01-28 Thread Joe Mason
I'm not clear from your question what you're trying to do. If you're just trying to write an app using the Qt port of WebKit, you should ask on webkit-h...@lists.webkit.orgmailto:webkit-h...@lists.webkit.org. This list is only for developing WebKit itself. The interface layer between Qt and

Re: [webkit-dev] How to add a new file to mac build system?

2011-01-26 Thread Joe Mason
WebCore/bindings/scripts/CodeGenerator*.pm From: webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org [mailto:webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org] On Behalf Of Won J Jeon Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 4:13 PM To: Mihai Parparita Cc: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] How to add a new file to

[webkit-dev] Scope of FrameLoader::isProcessingUserGesture

2011-01-10 Thread Joe Mason
In our platform implementation of dispatchWillPerformClientRedirect, we check whether the redirect was triggered by a user gesture: m_frame-loader()-isProcessingUserGesture() Since svn rev 65082, isProcessingUserGesture returns true when processing a meta tag refresh. We have a fix for this,

[webkit-dev] Getting at Settings object from WorkerContext

2011-01-06 Thread Joe Mason
I'm trying to add a setting to enable/disable WebSockets at runtime (so that the browser can make websockets available as a user preference, for instance). It's easy to add a flag to Settings, and check it from JSDOMWindowCustom::webSocket to return undefined for the websocket object when

Re: [webkit-dev] Getting at Settings object from WorkerContext

2011-01-06 Thread Joe Mason
Aha, there is already a websocketsEnabled method there! Thanks, that's perfect. From: jor...@google.com [mailto:jor...@google.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Orlow Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 1:25 PM To: Joe Mason Cc: webkit-dev Development Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Getting at Settings object

Re: [webkit-dev] Getting at Settings object from WorkerContext

2011-01-06 Thread Joe Mason
, but not any other code generator. Is this a V8-only thing? Joe From: webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org [mailto:webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org] On Behalf Of Joe Mason Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 1:52 PM To: Jeremy Orlow Cc: webkit-dev Development Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Getting

[webkit-dev] RuntimeEnabledFeatures for JSC (was RE: Getting at Settings object from WorkerContext)

2011-01-06 Thread Joe Mason
, January 06, 2011 2:43 PM To: Joe Mason Cc: webkit-dev Development Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Getting at Settings object from WorkerContext Btw, the reason that this behavior has to live in the bindings and not WebCore is to ensure feature detection code still works. For example, if indexedDB

Re: [webkit-dev] RuntimeEnabledFeatures for JSC (was RE: Getting at Settings object from WorkerContext)

2011-01-06 Thread Joe Mason
-Original Message- From: aba...@gmail.com [mailto:aba...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Adam Barth That's one my list of things I'd like to do, but my Perl isn't strong enough yet. :( I'm pretty sure my Perl is worse than yours, unfortunately. Perl and I do not get along. I've filed

Re: [webkit-dev] RuntimeEnabledFeatures for JSC (was RE: Getting at Settings object from WorkerContext)

2011-01-06 Thread Joe Mason
From: da...@google.com [mailto:da...@google.com] On Behalf Of Darin Fisher IIRC, there was not much interest from JSC-using ports for RuntimeEnabledFeatures. Well, there is now! Joe - This transmission (including any

Re: [webkit-dev] Stability problems involving Javascript GC

2010-12-16 Thread Joe Mason
-Original Message- From: webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org [mailto:webkit-dev- boun...@lists.webkit.org] On Behalf Of Samuel Rivas Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 3:03 AM To: Zoltan Herczeg Cc: webkit-dev Development Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Stability problems involving

Re: [webkit-dev] Style question: static, protected, or public members

2010-06-04 Thread Joe Mason
I'm strongly in favour of g_. It seems weird and ugly to me to have prefixes for some non-local scopes but not all. And it's very helpful to be able to look at a variable reference and immediately know that it's a global, and not a local whose definition you skimmed over. Joe -Original

[webkit-dev] Alt text not shown when AutoLoadImages is turned off

2010-05-26 Thread Joe Mason
I've noticed that when AutoLoadImages is turned off, the area where an image would be is totally blank. I'd expect to see the alt or title text, and maybe a border. George Staikos tells me that WebKit's always done this, but he can't remember the rationale. Is this by design? If so, what's the

[webkit-dev] testing client implementations

2010-01-26 Thread Joe Mason
I'm not too familiar with the test framework, but my impression is that the LayoutTests are all about the results of page rendering. Are there any tests which validate that callbacks on classes like FrameLoaderClient are called at the expected time? Joe

Re: [webkit-dev] PreloadScanner aggressiveness

2010-01-07 Thread Joe Mason
I don't think every port should be required to implement prioritization and throttling itself - that's just duplication of effort. Maybe there's a good middle-ground, where PreloadScanner is run more often but still does the priority sorting? Joe From: webkit-dev-boun...@lists.webkit.org

Re: [webkit-dev] Should we ever change style guidelines?

2009-12-10 Thread Joe Mason
Let's try this again now that I've resubscribed with the correct email address: On Wednesday 09 December 2009 07:52:22 pm Peter Kasting wrote: You haven't really said why. The closest you got was the vague It is also true that the current style guidelines if practiced pedantically in

Re: [webkit-dev] JSC without Dependencies

2009-08-17 Thread Joe Mason
Steve Falkenburg wrote: On Aug 17, 2009, at 11:04 AM, Brent Fulgham wrote: On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Brian Barnesgga...@charter.net wrote: icu*** (might not be possible, google says these are unicode tools) The wtf/unicode things need these libraries. I'm not sure how wise it

Re: [webkit-dev] Documenting common null pointer errors

2009-08-12 Thread Joe Mason
Adam Barth wrote: This is now up on the site: http://webkit.org/coding/major-objects.html It's not linked from anywhere yet. It might be a good idea for a couple of folks to look at it. It reflects my understanding of how things work, which might well be wrong. NULL after navigation could

Re: [webkit-dev] Dependency tracking in the Qt build system

2009-08-12 Thread Joe Mason
Mark Rowe wrote: On multiple occasions today we've been forced to manually do a clean build on the Qt build bot in order to work around test failures or crashes caused by bad builds. In the most recent case http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/47165 reordered some virtual methods in Element.

Re: [webkit-dev] Calling All Reviewers

2009-08-07 Thread Joe Mason
Adam Treat wrote: On Friday 07 August 2009 05:51:57 pm Eric Seidel wrote: We also definitely need to fix our tools to make it impossible to post a patch w/o a ChangeLog, and impossible to post a patch that doesn't pass check-webkit-style. This is a bad idea. check-webkit-style still has

Re: [webkit-dev] Towards a commit-queue

2009-08-03 Thread Joe Mason
Adam Barth wrote: On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 1:13 PM, David Kilzerddkil...@webkit.org wrote: Either we should change the review process to only set the review+ flag if the patch is ready to go with zero modifications, or we should use the commit+ flag to signify that. I could go either way on

Re: [webkit-dev] NeverNullT

2009-07-28 Thread Joe Mason
Eric Seidel wrote: Could get nasty when interacting with other templates though. I don't think we want a NeverNullOwnPtr, or maybe we do? Does this seem useful to anyone else? Oh c++ experts, does this even seem possible, seem like it would perform well, not bloat the code size, etc?

Re: [webkit-dev] Build File Maintenance (was Re: Please welcome GYP to the our dysfunctional build family)

2009-07-13 Thread Joe Mason
Maciej Stachowiak wrote: Another note, based on some #chromium conversations: if someone passionate made CMake (or any other tool) into something compelling enough to work better for Chromium than gyp does (or at least to work close-to-as-well), and that tool was more plausible for other ports

Re: [webkit-dev] Changes to prepare-ChangeLog

2009-07-09 Thread Joe Mason
with multiple authors? I've been doing this: 2009-07-08 Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com Make prepare-ChangeLog less shouty https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27098 Authors: Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com, Joe Mason joe.ma...@torchmobile.com Reviewed

Re: [webkit-dev] Iterating SunSpider

2009-07-05 Thread Joe Mason
Maciej Stachowiak wrote: I think the pauses were large in an attempt to get stable, repeatable results, but are probably longer than necessary to achieve this. I agree with you that the artifacts in balanced power mode are a problem. Do you know what timer thresholds avoid the effect? I think

Re: [webkit-dev] ChangeLog

2009-07-03 Thread Joe Mason
Darin Adler wrote: My experience on other projects that don’t use ChangeLog is that many check-ins don’t have clear comments or descriptions, and the fact that these are missing is considerably easier to overlook. Source code control comments can be tricky if you can never delete or edit them.

Re: [webkit-dev] ChangeLog

2009-07-03 Thread Joe Mason
Maciej Stachowiak wrote: I'm not sure why making an extra copy of the info on update is better than doing it on checkin. People update their tree more often than they commit, so prima facie this seems like a backwards way to do it. Also, svn2cl is much slower than a one-time copy of the latest

Re: [webkit-dev] Changes to prepare-ChangeLog

2009-07-02 Thread Joe Mason
Maciej Stachowiak wrote: With SVN at least, it's a lot faster and easier to do a text search on the ChangeLog than to retrieve and search the commit log history. Searching the actual commit logs is very slow online and doesn't work at all offline. The ChangeLog also ends up in static tarball

Re: [webkit-dev] Review states

2009-06-17 Thread Joe Mason
Eric Seidel wrote: It would appear bugzilla is too lame to support changing flag values +/-/? are all we get. :( https://bugs.webkit.org/editflagtypes.cgi (only accessible to bugzilla users with edit privilages). Maybe the solution is a different review tool instead of adding flags to

Re: [webkit-dev] opera unite api: extensions to add web server capability to browser engines

2009-06-16 Thread Joe Mason
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: perhaps a better question is, instead of saying it's not possible, it's not possible, is to ask: how can the javascript namespace be extended? This might indeed be a better question, and it's a shame you didn't ask it in the first place. how can objects

Re: [webkit-dev] Puzzled, can anyone give me a hint?

2009-06-15 Thread Joe Mason
TianShijun wrote: Hi All, I am reviewing the code of WebKit. I found that in PluginView.h/cpp , only one method (setPlatformPluginWidget) can set the private member PluginView::m_window to be non-zero. I have searched all the codes and found that only PluginViewMac.cpp has invoked this

Re: [webkit-dev] Puzzled, can anyone give me a hint?

2009-06-15 Thread Joe Mason
TianShijun wrote: Hi Joe, Now I get to know how it work in Qt/Windows. But i found that in Qt/X11, only PluginView.cpp and PluginViewQt.cpp will be compiled. Is that mean all the platformPluginWidget() will return 0? There are many platformPluginWidget()-foo() in PluginViewQt.cpp. Take a

Re: [webkit-dev] to reitveld or not to reitveld

2009-06-11 Thread Joe Mason
Mark Rowe wrote: On 2009-06-11, at 15:16, Ojan Vafai wrote: On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@google.com mailto:o...@google.com wrote: On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com mailto:mr...@apple.com wrote: There are also concerns about access

Re: [webkit-dev] to reitveld or not to reitveld

2009-06-10 Thread Joe Mason
Mark Rowe wrote: - UI is intimidating to newcomers. This is clearly subjective, but since the goal here is to make the review process friendlier, especially for new contributors, I think it deserves calling out. FWIW, after playing around with it for a few minutes I find its UI much, much

Re: [webkit-dev] to reitveld or not to reitveld

2009-06-10 Thread Joe Mason
Joe Mason wrote: Agreed. I expect will all end up calling it rfield soon enough (and I even typed that as rfiled the first time). I mean rveld, of course. I've been rereading Dracula, I think it's affecting my brain... Joe ___ webkit-dev mailing

Re: [webkit-dev] Getting more buildbots green

2009-01-05 Thread Joe Mason
Zan Dobersek wrote: Joe Mason wrote: Maybe the automated regression should run with --random to be sure that dependencies between tests are shaken out. On the other hand, you really want your regression to be deterministic - maybe a second run with --random scheduled once a week or so

Re: [webkit-dev] How to determine the could cut status ?

2008-08-06 Thread Joe Mason
Andy wrote: Hi, all, When I select a whole page, I could copy and paste it to other place. But most of the time I select a page, I'm not allowed to cut it since the browser does not permit it. So how could I query the status to determine whether I could copy or cut ? Editor::canCut()