On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Chris Marrin wrote:
>> On Feb 11, 2011, at 9:09 AM, Alex Milowski wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 1:41 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
How would folks feel about enabling ArrayBuffer by default? It seems
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Chris Marrin wrote:
> On Feb 11, 2011, at 9:09 AM, Alex Milowski wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 1:41 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
>>> How would folks feel about enabling ArrayBuffer by default? It seems
>>> to be a basic data type that's used by a bunch of stuff tod
On Feb 11, 2011, at 9:09 AM, Alex Milowski wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 1:41 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
>> How would folks feel about enabling ArrayBuffer by default? It seems
>> to be a basic data type that's used by a bunch of stuff today and
>> likely to be used by more stuff in the future.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 1:41 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
> How would folks feel about enabling ArrayBuffer by default? It seems
> to be a basic data type that's used by a bunch of stuff today and
> likely to be used by more stuff in the future. The API seems pretty
> stable and it's implemented by Fir
How would folks feel about enabling ArrayBuffer by default? It seems
to be a basic data type that's used by a bunch of stuff today and
likely to be used by more stuff in the future. The API seems pretty
stable and it's implemented by Firefox as well.
Adam
5 matches
Mail list logo
