> On Oct 30, 2021, at 10:45 AM, Ryosuke Niwa via webkit-dev
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 10:24 AM Sam Sneddon via webkit-dev
> mailto:webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org>> wrote:
> As part of the ongoing work on GPU Process, we’re interested in adding
> support for reftest fuzzy matching (i.e
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 10:24 AM Sam Sneddon via webkit-dev <
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org> wrote:
> As part of the ongoing work on GPU Process, we’re interested in adding
> support for reftest fuzzy matching (i.e., allowing a certain amount of
> tolerance when comparing the generated images).
>
>
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 06:24:02PM +0100, Sam Sneddon via webkit-dev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As part of the ongoing work on GPU Process, we’re interested in
> adding support for reftest fuzzy matching (i.e., allowing a certain
> amount of tolerance when comparing the generated images).
>
> [...]
>
> Fi
> On Oct 28, 2021, at 10:24 AM, Sam Sneddon via webkit-dev
> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> As part of the ongoing work on GPU Process, we’re interested in adding
> support for reftest fuzzy matching (i.e., allowing a certain amount of
> tolerance when comparing the generated images).
>
> Our intentio
Hi!
As part of the ongoing work on GPU Process, we’re interested in adding support
for reftest fuzzy matching (i.e., allowing a certain amount of tolerance when
comparing the generated images).
Our intention is to match the semantics of WPT’s reftests
(https://web-platform-tests.org/writing-te
5 matches
Mail list logo
