On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Pavel Feldman wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Pavel Feldman
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Pavel Feldman wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Pavel Feldman
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Check out InspectorValue. It should be renamed to JSONValu
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Pavel Feldman
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
> >>
> >> Check out InspectorValue. It should be renamed to JSONValue, but it
> >> should meet your needs.
> >
> > InspectorValue is
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Pavel Feldman wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
>>
>> Check out InspectorValue. It should be renamed to JSONValue, but it
>> should meet your needs.
>
> InspectorValue is not intended to be used as a full fledged JSON parser. It
> only cov
That's precisely what I wanted to do initially. I had conflicting feelings
on this, but my first intuition was to cache in the bindings the value
directly parsed and state managed by the respective VM. I don't see this
value being used by a different binding layer in parallel.
On Thu, Dec 8, 201
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
> Check out InspectorValue. It should be renamed to JSONValue, but it
> should meet your needs.
>
InspectorValue is not intended to be used as a full fledged JSON parser. It
only covers subset of the standard that is sufficient for the inspector
It's not safe to use ScriptObject for values that are kept alive by JS objects
as it leads to cycles in the collector.
Also the cached value for an attribute should be in the binding classes, not
the implementation classes. The easiest way to understand why is to ask
yourself how a non-js (obj
Check out InspectorValue. It should be renamed to JSONValue, but it should
meet your needs.
Adam
On Dec 8, 2011 8:39 AM, "Jarred Nicholls" wrote:
> Hey webkittens,
>
> I'm working on https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73648 to support
> the json response entity from XHR.response. Unless
Hey webkittens,
I'm working on https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73648 to support the
json response entity from XHR.response. Unless I'm mistaken (the purpose
of this inquiry) we don't appear to have a VM-agnostic interface for
internal JSON parsing, i.e., straight to the parsers. If so, w
9 matches
Mail list logo