On 26-Jul-07, at 14:00 , Darin Adler wrote:
On Jul 26, 2007, at 10:42 AM, Andre-John Mas wrote:
Are there any publicly available tools that we could use instead?
I believe it would be of benefit to everyone if we were on the
same page with the way we approaching testing. At the very least
On Jul 26, 2007, at 11:13 AM, Andre-John Mas wrote:
What should the requirements for the tool be, other than being
freely available?
I'm not sure these are requirements, but here are some of the things
I'd like to see:
- representative of real world performance
- one way to
2 matches
Mail list logo
