I want to give everyone an update on how things are evolving. For now,
I've focused most of the development on the Mac platform.
For the ref-tests-as-repaint-tests path, I've added an optional parameter
to LTC.display() that should control if the repaint rectangles are tracked
or not. If not
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Julien Chaffraix
julien.chaffr...@gmail.com wrote:
I second Simon's fragility argument. His solution is more viable,
platform agnostic and may even remove the need for dumping the pixel
in some cases.
Even if the existing harness has the subsequent paint
Andrei,
On 05/25/2012 02:43 AM, Andrei Bucur wrote:
Ojan,
As Simon states, some repaint tests will likely not be possible to
write correctly as ref tests, but some of them I think they fit very
well in the happy-no-pixel-test bucket :). If people decide it's a
direction worth investigating,
I think this will be too fragile. It relies on the fact that a subsequent
paint won't obscure the repaint bug that you're trying to detect.
I'm much rather we work towards detecting repaint bugs via dumping the
list of repaint rectangles. I don't think every test has to be a ref test.
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Dominik Röttsches
dominik.rottsc...@intel.com wrote:
Andrei,
On 05/25/2012 02:43 AM, Andrei Bucur wrote:
Ojan,
As Simon states, some repaint tests will likely not be possible to write
correctly as ref tests, but some of them I think they fit very well
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Žan Doberšek zandober...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Dominik Röttsches
dominik.rottsc...@intel.com wrote:
Andrei,
On 05/25/2012 02:43 AM, Andrei Bucur wrote:
Ojan,
As Simon states, some repaint tests will likely not be
Do you just need to force a layout at the end of repaintTest, e.g.
document.body.offsetHeight;?
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Andrei Bucur andrei.bu...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello WebKittens,
I'm trying to simplify the patch for a certain repaint bug (
No, I need a way to force a paint operation, similar to what
layoutTestController.display() achieves, but without tracking the paint
rectangles.
Does anyone you find value in adding an optional parameter to display (or
create another method on LTC) that disables paint rectangle tracking.
The
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Andrei Bucur andrei.bu...@gmail.comwrote:
No, I need a way to force a paint operation, similar to what
layoutTestController.display() achieves, but without tracking the paint
rectangles.
Does anyone you find value in adding an optional parameter to display
On May 24, 2012, at 3:59 PM, Andrei Bucur wrote:
No, I need a way to force a paint operation, similar to what
layoutTestController.display() achieves, but without tracking the paint
rectangles.
Does anyone you find value in adding an optional parameter to display (or
create another
Ojan,
As Simon states, some repaint tests will likely not be possible to write
correctly as ref tests, but some of them I think they fit very well in the
happy-no-pixel-test bucket :). If people decide it's a direction worth
investigating, I'll give the idea a spin.
Simon,
On Fri, May 25, 2012
11 matches
Mail list logo
