On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Dan Bernstein wrote:
> On Sep 4, 2012, at 5:50 AM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>
> Alternatively, you can compute the with of each character with script
>> (without adding any new feature to WebKit).
>>
>
> Unfortunately, that won't work since I can't access the width of
On Sep 4, 2012, at 5:50 AM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>>
>> Alternatively, you can compute the with of each character with script
>> (without adding any new feature to WebKit).
>
> Unfortunately, that won't work since I can't access the width of individual
> lines produced by formatting a block.
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> Can we use ref tests?
I'll try this first.
>
> Alternatively, you can compute the with of each character with script
> (without adding any new feature to WebKit).
>
Unfortunately, that won't work since I can't access the width of individu
Can we use ref tests?
Alternatively, you can compute the with of each character with script
(without adding any new feature to WebKit).
If neither is possible, then you should use (1) unless the test tests a
platform specific feature; I.e. the feature isnt available on other
platforms.
(3) seems
What is the recommended approach to test cases when one needs to use a CJK
font that covers the test data? I could use DRT text results as expected
but given lack of common font across platforms, that doesn't seem to be
effective.
>From my somewhat limited (i.e., newbie) exposure to WK, I gather o
5 matches
Mail list logo
