[webkit-dev] Turning on MathML by Default?
With the latest patch (37044) having been committed, I feel like we're at a point where I'd like the MathML implementation to be available in the nightly builds. The code has been built and tested successfully on the Mac and Gtk builds. I intend to look at the windows build next. We have a growing community of developers and interested users and having a nightly build with MathML would allow testing, submission of issues, and receipt of fixes. What do others think? -- --Alex Milowski The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered. Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] Turning on MathML by Default?
I'm also involved in implementing MathML and I share the Alex advice. MathML implementation has been asleep for too long. Turning it on by default should accelerate the recent progress. François Sausset Le 28 avr. 2010 à 14:40, Alex Milowski a écrit : With the latest patch (37044) having been committed, I feel like we're at a point where I'd like the MathML implementation to be available in the nightly builds. The code has been built and tested successfully on the Mac and Gtk builds. I intend to look at the windows build next. We have a growing community of developers and interested users and having a nightly build with MathML would allow testing, submission of issues, and receipt of fixes. What do others think? -- --Alex Milowski The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered. Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] Turning on MathML by Default?
Did anyone tested it on Qt port? Just curious... Regards, ismail On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Sausset François saus...@gmail.com wrote: I'm also involved in implementing MathML and I share the Alex advice. MathML implementation has been asleep for too long. Turning it on by default should accelerate the recent progress. François Sausset Le 28 avr. 2010 à 14:40, Alex Milowski a écrit : With the latest patch (37044) having been committed, I feel like we're at a point where I'd like the MathML implementation to be available in the nightly builds. The code has been built and tested successfully on the Mac and Gtk builds. I intend to look at the windows build next. We have a growing community of developers and interested users and having a nightly build with MathML would allow testing, submission of issues, and receipt of fixes. What do others think? -- --Alex Milowski The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered. Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] Turning on MathML by Default?
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:14 PM, İsmail Dönmez ism...@namtrac.org wrote: Did anyone tested it on Qt port? Just curious... No, not yet. I haven't setup a Qt build for myself quite yet (just Mac Gtk). That actually might be easier to do than Windows. :) I'll look into that today or tomorrow. -- --Alex Milowski The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered. Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] Turning on MathML by Default?
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Alex Milowski a...@milowski.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:14 PM, İsmail Dönmez ism...@namtrac.org wrote: Did anyone tested it on Qt port? Just curious... No, not yet. I haven't setup a Qt build for myself quite yet (just Mac Gtk). That actually might be easier to do than Windows. :) I'll look into that today or tomorrow. I wonder if it'll work fine since MathML also needs strong font support. Regards, ismail ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] Turning on MathML by Default?
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:11 PM, İsmail Dönmez ism...@namtrac.org wrote: I wonder if it'll work fine since MathML also needs strong font support. Font support is still an issue on all platforms. The STIX fonts that I've gotten ahold of are terrible. Maybe when they ship they'll be better. It is likely that the CSS will have to be customized on each platform to pick the correct expected font from the system. -- --Alex Milowski The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered. Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] Turning on MathML by Default?
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Alex Milowski a...@milowski.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:11 PM, İsmail Dönmez ism...@namtrac.org wrote: I wonder if it'll work fine since MathML also needs strong font support. Font support is still an issue on all platforms. The STIX fonts that I've gotten ahold of are terrible. Maybe when they ship they'll be better. Uh, they are supposed to be the best math fonts available :-) It is likely that the CSS will have to be customized on each platform to pick the correct expected font from the system. Indeed this makes more sense for the short term. Regards, ismail ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] Turning on MathML by Default?
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:53 PM, İsmail Dönmez ism...@namtrac.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Alex Milowski a...@milowski.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:11 PM, İsmail Dönmez ism...@namtrac.org wrote: I wonder if it'll work fine since MathML also needs strong font support. Font support is still an issue on all platforms. The STIX fonts that I've gotten ahold of are terrible. Maybe when they ship they'll be better. Uh, they are supposed to be the best math fonts available :-) That's the rumor. I'll wait and see what they look like when they are officially released. So far, the fonts I've been playing with (beta versions) have some obvious errors for operators. It is unclear when they will be officially released. -- --Alex Milowski The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered. Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] QtWebkit vs GtkWebkit
I am involved - as a user of webkit, helping find bugs that others may not have discovered. Unfortunately, I don't know my way around the innards of QtWebkit, so I am posting here in the hope that others who do, may have a solution. Thanks for your comments. Cheers, ---AK From: Evan Martin e...@chromium.org To: Phoenix Revived phoenixrevi...@yahoo.com Cc: Chinmaya Sn chinm...@gmail.com; webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org Sent: Tue, April 27, 2010 10:30:22 AM Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] QtWebkit vs GtkWebkit On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Phoenix Revived phoenixrevi...@yahoo.com wrote: Yes, I have tried this on several versions of Ubuntu, including Lucid. I don't have Windows machine so I can't try that. There is not a single instance of a QtWebKit browser (or my own snippet of QtWebKit code) that works - and 100% of every GtkWebKit browsers (and my own snippet of GtkWebKit code) that works on my Linux system. This is forcing me to create a hybrid application written in Qt, with the webkit portion being handled in Gtk - which, I am sure I don't need to inform anyone, is a royal pain in the ass. If I am missing something obvious, I would appreciate a hint. The best candidate for something obvious you overlooked is the Getting Involved heading on the webkit.org site! :) From your diagnosis it sounds like perhaps either WebKitQt is lacking support for these plugins (or possibly there's a misconfiguration or something). Rather than the royal pain of working around it, why not fix WebKitQt? From a grep in the WebKitQt plugin code it does look like it has some preliminary bit of Gtk support. ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
[webkit-dev] Function Property Names
I'm in the process of writing a program to analyze traces of JavaScript code. This involves logging events that occur in the interpreter. Currently, I'm trying to just log function calls and property accesses. However, I'm unsure exactly how to go about getting the names (identifiers) associated with functions (and properties). I wrote the following piece of code just to test things out, which I inserted in Interpreter.cpp, in the definition of the op_call opcode, after the vPC = newCodeBlock-instructions().begin(); line: JSGlobalObject* globalObject = callFrame-scopeChain()-globalObject; printf(Function call: %s\n, asFunction(v)-name(globalObject-globalExec()).ascii()); printf(%s\n, newCodeBlock-ownerExecutable()-sourceURL().ascii()); printf(%i\n, newCodeBlock-ownerExecutable()-lineNo()); My goal was to report the name of the function being called each time an op_call is executed. However, this does not report the function names correctly. My guess is that I'm passing the wrong value to InternalFunction::name(). Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong here? I'm rather unfamiliar with the WebKit code. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Function---Property-Names-tp28394250p28394250.html Sent from the Webkit mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] Function Property Names
However, this does not report the function names correctly. What happens instead? Geoff ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
[webkit-dev] policy on perf/memory regressions?
Do we have a policy on perf/memory regressions? I've been told that there's a zero-regression policy for page load tests. Is that actually the case? What about cases that are clear perf regressions that don't show up in PLT (e.g. they show up in one of the Chromium page load tests and/or on a real-world web page)? Perf and memory regressions seem much worse to me than test failures. Unlike test failures, there's isn't a binary right or wrong. If a patch regresses performance and then other patches come in that further improve/regress performance, it becomes nearly impossible to tell if the fix for the original patch actually addresses the entirety of the original regression. The only case I can think of where perf regressions might be ok are: 1. The fix will be checked in reasonably soon (hours, not days/weeks). This matches our policy with failing tests. 2. We think there's no way to address the perf/memory regression and that the new functionality justifies it. This is extremely rare. I'm asking because I've had considerable pushback dealing with a recent perf/memory regression on OS X that's been sitting in the tree for 3 weeks. I'm not linking to the bug in question because that issue is resolved. This is forward looking. I'd like to see us have a written down policy. Ideally, one day, we'll also have bots that run perf/memory tests and turn red when there is a regression. Ojan ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] Disabling the JIT
Just curious, how would you verify if JavaScript in your browser has JIT support or not? On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Nyx mch...@cs.mcgill.ca wrote: Another way would be to set export QMAKEARGS=$QMAKEARGS DEFINES+=ENABLE_JIT=0 before building. Ok. I tried this approach. I have a build script that looks like this: QTDIR=/usr/share/qt4/ export QMAKEARGS=$QMAKEARGS DEFINES+=ENABLE_JIT=0 WebKit/WebKitTools/Scripts/build-webkit --qt It builds, but the JIT is not disabled. It seems that the new argument is simply ignored. I also tried adding #define ENABLE_JIT 0 at the top of the Interpreter.cpp file in JavaScriptCore. This builds, but produces a segmentation fault. I will try doing the WebKit/WebKitTools/Scripts/build-webkit --qt JAVASCRIPTCORE_JIT=no with a fresh SVN checkout... Is there any equivalent of make clean script, as a completment to build-webkit? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Disabling-the-JIT-tp28378562p28382091.html Sent from the Webkit mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev -- -- chinmaya sn ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
