I hope this isn't a stupid question, but I can't find any references to
what the difference between AtomicString and String is. It looks like
AtomicString is generally preferred, but I don't know why. Can someone
fill me in on this? Is there any refences for the classes in WTF?
signature.asc
It is faster to compare and hash AtomicString than regular Strings.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Brendan Long s...@brendanlong.com wrote:
I hope this isn't a stupid question, but I can't find any references to
what the difference between AtomicString and String is. It looks like
Are there any advantages to String over AtomicString?
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Daker Pinheiro
daker.pinhe...@openbossa.org wrote:
It is faster to compare and hash AtomicString than regular Strings.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Brendan Long s...@brendanlong.comwrote:
I hope
So should I just never use String and always use AtomicString?
On 05/31/2013 03:14 PM, Daker Pinheiro wrote:
It is faster to compare and hash AtomicString than regular Strings.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Brendan Long s...@brendanlong.com
mailto:s...@brendanlong.com wrote:
I hope
On May 31, 2013, at 1:57 PM, Brendan Long s...@brendanlong.com wrote:
I hope this isn't a stupid question, but I can't find any references to what
the difference between AtomicString and String is.
WTF::AtomicString is a class that has four differences from the normal
WTF::String class:
1)
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On May 31, 2013, at 1:57 PM, Brendan Long s...@brendanlong.com wrote:
I hope this isn't a stupid question, but I can't find any references to what
the difference between AtomicString and String is.
WTF::AtomicString is a
On May 31, 2013, at 3:27 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
I believe we store a bit on StringImpl that makes conversion from String and
StringImpl to AtomicString fast
if the underlying StringImpl is already in the AtomicStringTable.
Good point. Converting back to an atomic string
We shouldn't use AtomicString if the string we're about to create doesn't
get shared across multiple AtomicStrings.
For example, if we had used AtomicString for the strings inside Text nodes,
then we may end up filling up the atomic string table with all these really
long strings that don't
This thread contains really useful information, so I've created a new topic
on https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/EfficientStrings and pointed to here.
Best regards,
Rafael
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
We shouldn't use AtomicString if the string we're about
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Rafael Brandao
rafael.l...@openbossa.orgwrote:
This thread contains really useful information, so I've created a new
topic on https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/EfficientStrings and pointed to
here.
One thing that always threw me was the term Atomic in the class
Great! Maybe we even want to add it to
http://www.webkit.org/coding/technical-articles.html after converting it to
a web page?
- R. Niwa
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Rafael Brandao
rafael.l...@openbossa.orgwrote:
This thread contains really useful information, so I've created a new
+1 :-)
On Friday, May 31, 2013, Glenn Adams wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Rafael Brandao
rafael.l...@openbossa.orgjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'rafael.l...@openbossa.org');
wrote:
This thread contains really useful information, so I've created a new
topic on
12 matches
Mail list logo
