Hi Alexey,On Nov 10, 2007, at 1:42 AM, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote:on 10.11.2007 01:55, Rob Burns at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:However, I think its better to show all of the standardswhether targeted by Apple or not. There are a lot of specifications out there - how would you decide whetherone is suitable for inclusion on this page? E.g., should we waste bandwidthexplicitly stating that we are not interested in RFC 3251 support?I understand that we could never make the list completely exhaustive. However, the list Phillippe provided is a good starting point. It may be worthwhile to provide links to pages for discussion of the reasons a particular standard is not (or is not yet) supported. After all it is a wiki. Many of the items Maciej removed are not all that helpful. It makes the list very much like the list on the non-wiki part of the website. It might make sense to link to that list as well so that contributors can see this Apple view of things.The Wiki can provide a valuable place to see archive how these discussion may have gone in the past.However, I assume other contributors arefree to bring standard supports to WebKit. I know of two such projectsmyself where contributors are working to bring standards support toWebKit not currently targeted by Apple. If they are working on such support, they can edit the page to mentionthat - it's a wiki.Definitely. However, I think the list Phillippe created was a nice core list to start with. Its worthwhile linking to further explanation for why WebKit has not in the past targeted some of those standards and provide a list of some obvious standards that contributors might pursue.Take care,Rob___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
