What's your testcase?
One potential issue you could be seeing is that we don't dump the bytecode
until we compile code so the code for a function won't be dumped until you call
it for instance, but you should at the very least be getting an bc dump for the
containing global code.
--Oliver
On
What gives?
The documentation says,
Usage: jsc [options] [files] [-- arguments]
-d Dumps bytecode (debug builds only)
-e Evaluate argument as script code
-f Specifies a source file (deprecated)
-h|--help Prints this help message
-i Enables interactive
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
> I finally updated this
> page http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/UsingGitWithWebKit#webkit-patchcheck-webkit-styleandgit.
> As is clear from that, my earlier description of --no-squash was totally
> inaccurate. Sorry, I was being rushed. --no-squash a
I finally updated this page
http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/UsingGitWithWebKit#webkit-patchcheck-webkit-styleandgit
.
As is clear from that, my earlier description of --no-squash was totally
inaccurate. Sorry, I was being rushed. --no-squash and --git-commit still
need significant work before they wil
13.05.2010, в 10:19, David Levin написал(а):
Should we just r- and ask that it wait for "conceptual issues to be
resolved in IETF spec review first" (unless for some reason it is
needed quickly and that takes too long)?
I am not aware of any specific conceptual issues, just the fact that
On May 13, 2010, at 12:12 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
> * 34953: Implement DEFINE_STUB_FUNCTION for WinCE
I think this bug (and bug 36050, which it depends on) should be reviewed by
Gavin Barraclough.
-Adam
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webk
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote:
>
> 13.05.2010, в 9:41, David Levin написал(а):
>
>
> * 35573: WebSocket add new event: CloseEvent
>>
>> I think ap is much more familiar with WebSockets -- though I am willing to
>> look if needed.
>>
>
> Anyone can review this patch
13.05.2010, в 9:41, David Levin написал(а):
* 35573: WebSocket add new event: CloseEvent
I think ap is much more familiar with WebSockets -- though I am
willing to look if needed.
Anyone can review this patch - the key to reviewing is to decide
whether a "close event" actually makes sens
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 5:41 PM, David Levin wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
>
>> One of the least fun things in the project is to pour a bunch of
>> effort into writing a patch only to see it sit forever waiting for
>> review. In the past, I've tried to single-h
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
> One of the least fun things in the project is to pour a bunch of
> effort into writing a patch only to see it sit forever waiting for
> review. In the past, I've tried to single-handedly tackle the patches
> that have been up for review for mo
13.05.2010, в 06:15, Eric Seidel написал(а):
> That error looks like its trying to use python < 2.5.
>
> Skipping the websocket tests on Tiger (manually at least) is bad.
> Would be better to do it based on detected python. Filed:
> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39058
> about doing ju
One of the least fun things in the project is to pour a bunch of
effort into writing a patch only to see it sit forever waiting for
review. In the past, I've tried to single-handedly tackle the patches
that have been up for review for more than a month. That approach is
less than ideal because (1
That error looks like its trying to use python < 2.5.
Skipping the websocket tests on Tiger (manually at least) is bad.
Would be better to do it based on detected python. Filed:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39058
about doing just that.
-eric
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Fumitoshi
I heard on #webkit that the Tiger bot has been on Python 2.5 for some time,
and found r+ for https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38886 and
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38822. I believe we have consensus
to use Python 2.5 (or later) for webkit development environment.
I tried to land
14 matches
Mail list logo
