Guessed so from Qt port... Now we need to do that for both soup and
curl, or write an abstraction for elf with some backend outside webkit
On Saturday, July 24, 2010, Darin Adler wrote:
> This is a matter for the networking layer in your particular port rather than
> for WebKit itself. It does n
On Jul 23, 2010, at 9:46 AM, Flávio Ceolin wrote:
> First of all, is this a task for WebCore or the port ?
If I understand your question correctly, the answer is that it’s a task for the
networking layer, which is port-specific. The Mac OS X WebKit networking layer,
NSURLConnection, has this fe
This is a matter for the networking layer in your particular port rather than
for WebKit itself. It does not require changes to WebKit. The Mac OS X WebKit
networking layer, NSURLConnection, has this feature. It’s done by creating a
custom NSURLProtocol object.
-- Darin
___
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
> On Jul 23, 2010, at 4:50 PM, Leo Meyerovich wrote:
>>> I wasn't entirely sure what OP was after of if the reply below
>>> adequately addressed his interests.
>>
>> WebKit2 seems to have little to do with taking advantage of parallel
>> hardwar
On Jul 23, 2010, at 4:50 PM, Leo Meyerovich wrote:
>
>> I wasn't entirely sure what OP was after of if the reply below
>> adequately addressed his interests.
>
> WebKit2 seems to have little to do with taking advantage of parallel hardware
> in browser algorithms like lexing, parsing, selector
> I wasn't entirely sure what OP was after of if the reply below
> adequately addressed his interests.
WebKit2 seems to have little to do with taking advantage of parallel hardware
in browser algorithms like lexing, parsing, selectors, JS compilation, JS
execution, layout, DOM interactions, fon
I've identified a crash with the MathML implementation related to use of
CSS style rules that cause a RenderLayer instance to be created. In the
MathML code's various createRenderer() methods, they always call
RenderObject::setStyle() on the object they've just created.
When the setStyle() method
I have been thinking along these lines as well. I'm not sure how
relevant touching existing lines of code is versus just other people
who have hacked on the file at all or who have hacked on other files
in the same directory (i.e., you'd need to address new code and new
files, too). I think some em
Hi folks,
I have a couple o doubts about how to register another protocol
handler on webkit.
First of all, is this a task for WebCore or the port ? I' ve searched
for it and I found something in ResourceHandle and PolicyCheck, which
one is responsible for that?
Second, is there a easy way to inte
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
> On Jul 22, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
>> Sorry to disturb this already dead thread, but we're (webkit-efl) thinking
>> of letting applications/browsers register new protocol handlers to provide
>> contents themselves
Thanks Andras! I will take a look at this.
-Ying
2010/7/23 Andras Becsi
> Hi Ying,
>
> you might be looking for WebKit2, wich is a non-blocking API layer for
> WebKit and aims to make WebKit more suitable for multicore systems. It
> supports the split-process model and the thread model as well.
Hi Marchywka ,
Thanks for your comments about the paralle browser.:)
Your point is that exeucution can not benifit from multi-thread multi-core
for the following reasons:
1) Inter-thread compete
2) Cache thrashing (false sharing)
3) task offload overhead (BW limitation etc)
Generally, all these
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Alex Milowski wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
>> Given a patch file, you have its line number ranges.
>>
>> Given a git checkout, you can very quickly find who has made changes
>> to what lines in that file.
>>
>> You then can have a b
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
> Given a patch file, you have its line number ranges.
>
> Given a git checkout, you can very quickly find who has made changes
> to what lines in that file.
>
> You then can have a bot post to the bug, saying that 10 people have
> touched the li
Given a patch file, you have its line number ranges.
Given a git checkout, you can very quickly find who has made changes
to what lines in that file.
You then can have a bot post to the bug, saying that 10 people have
touched the lines you're touching in your patch. 3 of them are active
reviewer
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
> I've never really liked trac.webkit.org/wiki/WebKit%20Team. Its
> always seemed more of place to brag about webkit involvement, than a
> useful reference. I think we could build a much better "who should I
> ask to review this" tool based on
I've never really liked trac.webkit.org/wiki/WebKit%20Team. Its
always seemed more of place to brag about webkit involvement, than a
useful reference. I think we could build a much better "who should I
ask to review this" tool based on SVN information.
-eric
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Da
17 matches
Mail list logo
