No change in iBench.
-- Stephanie
On Jul 28, 2010, at 8:15 PM, Stephanie Lewis wrote:
> I believe it is somewhere, but the setup is a hassle, so I'll run it tomorrow
> for you.
>
> -- Stephanie
>
> On Jul 28, 2010, at 8:13 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Maciej St
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
> This sequence doesn’t sound too terrible to me. But I don’t fully
>> understand the proposal. At the time the focusin event fires we won’t yet
>> know what item is getting focus?
>>
>
> I think we do know this and it wouldn't be too hard to
WebCore::LayoutTestController would be exposed to JavaScript running
in LayoutTests directly (like the DOM), so we can skip the type
conversions.
Adam
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Satish Sampath wrote:
> With a WebCore::LayoutTestController, would there be a need for code in
> WebKit to con
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Joone Hur wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:13 AM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
> > On Jul 28, 2010, at 8:45 AM, Joone Hur wrote:
> >> 3) Keyboard events should not be dispatched during a composition.
> > Key events must be sent while an IME is active otherwise sites bre
I'm fine with it as well; the name confuses a lot of new contributors.
Kenneth
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
>> Hi folks.
>>
>> WebKit regression tests are in a directory named LayoutTests. The object the
>> tests use
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
> WebKit regression tests are in a directory named LayoutTests. The object the
> tests uses to do special test-specific operations is "layoutTestController".
> Both of these names are unwanted baggage, left over from when the tes
On Jul 29, 2010, at 11:09 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> But I'm not sure if converting all the existing tests is feasible or worth
> the effort. Is there any practical problem other than being semantically
> "wrong"?
This is not something we have to decide up front.
Converting the existing tests i
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
> The directory should be eventually be named Tests or WebKitTests or
> RegressionTests. Eric Seidel can probably remember talking this over with me
> the day after we added the LayoutTests directory; sorry that I never fixed
> it!
>
This soun
Hi folks.
WebKit regression tests are in a directory named LayoutTests. The object the
tests uses to do special test-specific operations is "layoutTestController".
Both of these names are unwanted baggage, left over from when the test
machinery was only good for testing layout.
The directory s
With a WebCore::LayoutTestController, would there be a need for code in
WebKit to convert the call parameters from WebKit types (which DRT uses) to
WebCore types (which the mocks may use) ? If yes seems like we need wrappers
to proxy the mock calls anyway on different platforms..
Cheers
Satish
On
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:13 AM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
>
> On Jul 28, 2010, at 8:45 AM, Joone Hur wrote:
>
>> 3) Keyboard events should not be dispatched during a composition.
> Key events must be sent while an IME is active otherwise sites break. IIRC
> you get keydown and keyup events, but not ke
Thanks for bring this question to the list. I don't have a strong
opinion here, but I want to make sure we think project-wide and pick
something scalable.
This discussion is also related to the discussion about adding
something like a layoutTestController object to WebCore. Plumbing
this mock AP
12 matches
Mail list logo
