Hi, I'm sorry that I did it yesterday.
Usually I use webkit-patch. But that patch had 2 bug URLs and
webkit-patch didn't work for it.
So I rewrote ChangeLogs - with the wrong way.
If webkit-patch land support --bug-id, it might be helpful for my case.
Thanks.
--
morita
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
how is expected.txt file generating while test layouttests
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 4:07 PM, KrishnaMurthy Naidu
krishnamurthyna...@gmail.com wrote:
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 03:32 -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
Guessed so from Qt port... Now we need to do that for both soup and
curl, or write an abstraction for elf with some backend outside webkit
FYI, this is being worked on in soup:
From: lmeye...@eecs.berkeley.edu
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 17:51:22 -0700
To: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] strategy for evaluating performance issues
related to memory.
I've been doing some memory benchmarking recently (my
Anyway I'm open to suggestions here. :)
I came to very similar conclusions that you did and posted a WIP patch
here: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43507 . I'm not sure if
it is ready or good, but in particular removing the caching behavior for
::image() led to a lot of unexpected
Hi,
as we all know, when writing DOM bindings on top of WebKit we are
supposed to use the IDL files it ships as the source of the structure
and behavior of the DOM. At first I had assumed that to figure out
which events apply to each type/class it was OK to see which
EventListeners were defined,
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Geoffrey Garen gga...@apple.com wrote:
As Ojan indicated,
the use cases for DOM Mutation events are extremely limited and to me,
most of them feel like we should be solving them differently anyway.
This is the question I'm most interested in.
You say the use
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Xan Lopez x...@gnome.org wrote:
as we all know, when writing DOM bindings on top of WebKit we are
supposed to use the IDL files it ships as the source of the structure
and behavior of the DOM. At first I had assumed that to figure out
which events apply to
Chromium skips it (and if I remember correctly, they commissioned it?)
Why do we want to be running these 6000 tests and slowing down our
builds. I was talking with jamesr, and he seemed to think it adds
little value to run it every time? (It was supposedly written as more
of a development tool
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
I'm not sure I understand your question. Every event can happen on
every EventTarget.
I mean that an HTMLMediaElement will naturally emit an 'ended' Event
in some situations, but an HTMLImageElement won't. I see no obvious
10.08.2010, в 11:51, Eric Seidel написал(а):
Why do we want to be running these 6000 tests and slowing down our
builds. I was talking with jamesr, and he seemed to think it adds
little value to run it every time? (It was supposedly written as more
of a development tool for V8?) But maybe
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Xan Lopez x...@gnome.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
I'm not sure I understand your question. Every event can happen on
every EventTarget.
I mean that an HTMLMediaElement will naturally emit an 'ended' Event
in
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 6:17 PM, David Hyatt hy...@apple.com wrote:
There are other cases as well where you want a copy. Patterns are another
example. For example you can create a pattern from another canvas, and I
don't think it's supposed to be live if that other canvas later changes.
I thought Sputnik came from Microsoft?
-- Dirk
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org wrote:
Chromium skips it (and if I remember correctly, they commissioned it?)
Why do we want to be running these 6000 tests and slowing down our
builds. I was talking with jamesr,
Nope, it's from Chromium:
http://blog.chromium.org/2009/06/launching-sputnik-into-orbit.html
http://blog.chromium.org/2010/03/does-your-browser-behave.html
Mihai
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
I thought Sputnik came from Microsoft?
-- Dirk
On Tue,
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org wrote:
10.08.2010, в 11:51, Eric Seidel написал(а):
Why do we want to be running these 6000 tests and slowing down our
builds. I was talking with jamesr, and he seemed to think it adds
little value to run it every time?
10.08.2010, в 14:00, Adam Barth написал(а):
A better long-term fix might be to finish new-run-webkit-tests so we
can run the tests in parallel.
One reason to move the tests to run-javascriptcore-tests is that people working
on JS run these more often (sometimes not even building WebCore
Eric Seidel írta:
Chromium skips it (and if I remember correctly, they commissioned it?)
Why do we want to be running these 6000 tests and slowing down our
builds. I was talking with jamesr, and he seemed to think it adds
little value to run it every time? (It was supposedly written as more
On Aug 10, 2010, at 2:49 PM, David Hyatt wrote:
Yeah, I think an even better way of abstracting it might be to make
ImageBuffer:drawIntoContext(GraphicsContext*, ...). I think that would be
simpler for people implementing something special. If we did that, then the
image() accessor on
Please try 'run-layout-tests --help' to see the command line options of
run-layout-tests script.
The '--new-test-results' and '--reset-results' options will help you
generate the expected file.
You may also want to read http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/CreatingLayoutTests to
learn the different types
Hi, developers,
I'd really like my patches to be reviewed and landed. Could any
reviewer/commiter help me? The normal review/commit queue mechanisms aren't
suitable for the the patches because the layout-tests in them are almost
always out-dated.
Thanks,
Xianzhu
2010/8/1 Xianzhu Wang
The bindings do not expose events directly, thus the IDL files don’t show the
events. The IDL files only show functions and attributes on the various
objects. Events are neither functions nor attributes. For the bindings I am
familiar with, there is no list of events and so nothing to be
23 matches
Mail list logo
