I don't think that the suite is testing much besides what we already have
regression tests for. For the most part, it just has different expectations.
There doesn't seem to be any harm in importing it as a whole now, but looking
over the failing tests, categorizing them and sending feedback to
Great to see someone else interested in doing ruby implementation! :)
I did the original ruby implementation, so I'm very happy to help with any
questions/problems/issues (bugs? there are not bugs!). BTW, please note that
there is another ruby patch in the review pipeline:
Yes, I have just gone through all the tests in this suite
and categorized and filed some WebKit bugs. Some other test failures seem to
be due to something wrong with tests themselves. I am pinging Anne about
these issues.
Thanks,
Jian
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Alexey Proskuryakov
--
Regards
Navigate Today For Better Tomorrow!!!
mEeT mE LivE wItH tEcH cAkE @
http://hitechi.19.forumer.com/
http://go4expert.com/
http://www.liveperson.com/asadullah-ansari/
http://go4hitech.wordpress.com/
___
webkit-dev mailing list
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org wrote:
I don't think that the suite is testing much besides what we already have
regression tests for. For the most part, it just has different expectations.
FWIW, if you find cases the test suite is missing I'm happy to add
On Sep 21, 2010, at 2:52 AM, Roland Steiner wrote:
We'd probably need to add a new value to that property if Ruby is supposed to
be skipped.
Ergh Looking at it, I'm not sure that's a good proposal at all - at least
it has still lots to address (it doesn't address list bullets,
On Sep 20, 2010, at 9:52 PM, Roland Steiner wrote:
Great to see someone else interested in doing ruby implementation! :)
I did the original ruby implementation, so I'm very happy to help with any
questions/problems/issues (bugs? there are not bugs!). BTW, please note that
there is
Hi Eric,
comments inline:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Eric Mader ema...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 20, 2010, at 9:52 PM, Roland Steiner wrote:
Oh vey, that's ambituous! :) There's so many corner cases I foresee on
this one that I was just too happy to postpone it when we originally
8 matches
Mail list logo