On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 14:35, fredx21 wrote:
> My application is hosting a WebView instance to render its GUI using the
> Windows CE port of Webkit.
>
>
>
> I need to be able to call some JavaScript functions that are written into
> the loaded HTML page. For example, I have an Init(backgroundColor
Completely embarrassing ... but it is an XHTML file and so the markup
in the string gets parsed unless I escape it ...
*sigh* Too many hours wasted in the debugger on this one. :(
So, it is a non-issue. Thanks to Evan Martin for pointed that out.
--
--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar
My application is hosting a WebView instance to render its GUI using the
Windows CE port of Webkit.
I need to be able to call some JavaScript functions that are written into
the loaded HTML page. For example, I have an Init(backgroundColor) function
that needs to be called once the page is load
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Alex Milowski wrote:
> I've got a new IDL class I'm working of for some "experiments in XML"
> and I've run into an interesting snag. I have a call to a "parse"
> method from Javascript where the string argument seems to be getting
> mangled. The IDL for the metho
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
>>
>>> Right. Having a shared version number across WebKit builds will never
>>> catch every case (e.g. patches pulled into branches, di
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
>
>> Right. Having a shared version number across WebKit builds will never
>> catch every case (e.g. patches pulled into branches, disabled features,
>> etc.), but it is better in general than
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>>
>>> Using svn revision numbers has the downside of not reflecting branches
>>> very well. A bigger number may correspond to a recen
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>
>> Using svn revision numbers has the downside of not reflecting branches
>> very well. A bigger number may correspond to a recent change to an old
>> branch for instance. So, you cannot
8 matches
Mail list logo