[webkit-dev] Feature Announcement: adding image-resolution

2012-05-01 Thread David Barr
Per http://www.webkit.org/coding/adding-features.html I'm working on adding image-resolution support to WebKit. http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-css3-images-20120417/#image-resolution The css3-images module is at candidate recommendation. Folks interested can follow along:

Re: [webkit-dev] Implementing CSS3 Paged Media Margin Boxes

2012-05-01 Thread Simon Fraser
Dave Hyatt is interested in doing more Paged Media stuff. Any work in this area should be preceded by a conversation with Dave. Simon On Apr 27, 2012, at 11:47 AM, Eric Seidel wrote: Ref-tests did not exist in WebKit when I last looked at this. I added pdf printing tests, only to realize

Re: [webkit-dev] Feature Announcement: Adding iframe seamless

2012-05-01 Thread Eric Seidel
Work is complete, fully working. Passing all the tests I could come up with: https://github.com/eseidel/webkit/compare/master...seamless I'm uploading and landing patches once reviewed again in bugzilla. I do not plan to add an ENABLE, as this work is complete and will all be landed by end of

Re: [webkit-dev] Feature Announcement: Adding iframe seamless

2012-05-01 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On May 1, 2012, at 12:20 PM, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org wrote: Work is complete, fully working. Passing all the tests I could come up with: https://github.com/eseidel/webkit/compare/master...seamless I'm uploading and landing patches once reviewed again in bugzilla. I do not plan to

Re: [webkit-dev] Feature Announcement: Adding iframe seamless

2012-05-01 Thread Dimitri Glazkov
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On May 1, 2012, at 12:20 PM, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org wrote: Work is complete, fully working.  Passing all the tests I could come up with: https://github.com/eseidel/webkit/compare/master...seamless I'm

Re: [webkit-dev] Feature Announcement: Adding iframe seamless

2012-05-01 Thread Eric Seidel
Is your goal to be able to disable the feature to prevent a late-known security issue? Or is your goal to universally disable seamless for a port entirely? On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On May 1, 2012, at 12:20 PM, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org wrote:

Re: [webkit-dev] Feature Announcement: Adding iframe seamless

2012-05-01 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On May 1, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org wrote: Is your goal to be able to disable the feature to prevent a late-known security issue? Or is your goal to universally disable seamless for a port entirely? I'm not sure I understand the difference between these. The capability

Re: [webkit-dev] Feature Announcement: Adding iframe seamless

2012-05-01 Thread Adam Barth
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On May 1, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org wrote: Is your goal to be able to disable the feature to prevent a late-known security issue? Or is your goal to universally disable seamless for a port entirely?

Re: [webkit-dev] Feature Announcement: Adding iframe seamless

2012-05-01 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On May 1, 2012, at 4:04 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote: On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On May 1, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org wrote: Is your goal to be able to disable the feature to prevent a late-known security issue? Or

[webkit-dev] Maciej's prefixing questions (was Re: webkitPostMessage)

2012-05-01 Thread Adam Barth
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: In the longer term, here's a few things we should think about: - Historically, we've almost never removed prefixed versions of features that get promoted to unprefixed. The marginal maintenance cost is low and there's