On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Zoltan Herczeg wrote:
> Hi Dirk,
>
>> At any rate, I believe we are definitely open to adding new features;
>> feel free to suggest them or work on them!
>
> I am happy to hear that.
>
> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88680
>
> This is definitely a right st
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
> Can you just expand out FAIL to it's equivalent longform? FAIL == TEXT
> IMAGE IMAGE+TEXT. I don't see a need to block the infrastructure change on
> this as the semantics are exactly the same. You can just find/replace every
> instance of FAIL
Can you just expand out FAIL to it's equivalent longform? FAIL == TEXT
IMAGE IMAGE+TEXT. I don't see a need to block the infrastructure change on
this as the semantics are exactly the same. You can just find/replace every
instance of FAIL.
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> H
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Dirk Pranke wrote:
> I believe most if not all of the ports have started using either
> TestExpectations files or a combination of TestExpectations files
> (except for the Apple Win port).
>
> Can we explicitly switch to the TestExpectations files at this point
> a
4 matches
Mail list logo
