Re: [webkit-dev] DOM methods that affect [[Prototype]]

2013-01-25 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Geoffrey Garen gga...@apple.com wrote: Anne, can you help me get those comments sent to the w3 list? I sent them myself, but they seem to be held up or bounced? Hey, I think they did make it, and Boris replied:

Re: [webkit-dev] Changing Github repository to mirror git.webkit.org (was Github vs. git.webkit.org)

2013-01-25 Thread Florin Malita
Looks like mirroring stopped on 1/23 (last commit: https://github.com/WebKit/webkit/commit/d5c4f2bd4a80b397eade1ee53b39d738e5656598 ). Jesus, can you take a look? Thanks, Florin On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Jesus Sanchez-Palencia je...@webkit.orgwrote: Hi, The mirror is finally ready

[webkit-dev] WebIDL implementation plans (was: Re: Multiple inheritance in the DOM)

2013-01-25 Thread Dirk Schulze
This is a followup to the multiple inheritance discussion. Adam, I checked the IDL files on SVG2 [1]. The interfaces for SVG2 do not have multiple inheritances of interfaces that are exposed to bindings. But SVG2 still uses the implements statement for [NoInterfaceObject] interfaces [2]. This

Re: [webkit-dev] WebIDL implementation plans (was: Re: Multiple inheritance in the DOM)

2013-01-25 Thread Adam Barth
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote: This is a followup to the multiple inheritance discussion. Adam, I checked the IDL files on SVG2 [1]. The interfaces for SVG2 do not have multiple inheritances of interfaces that are exposed to bindings. But SVG2 still

Re: [webkit-dev] build.webkit.org down

2013-01-25 Thread William Siegrist
Here are the largest results sets on the master in GB. We currently store 6.8TB of total results, going back 14 months, and 1.1TB of archives going back 1 week. 1500Apple MountainLion (Leaks) 1018Chromium Mac Release (Tests) 857 Chromium Linux Release (Tests) 532 Chromium Win

Re: [webkit-dev] build.webkit.org down

2013-01-25 Thread Eric Seidel
I'm surprised that chromium mac is 3x the size of Apple Mac... debug even! Chromium build output should be much smaller... at least as of late. On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:30 AM, William Siegrist wsiegr...@apple.com wrote: Here are the largest results sets on the master in GB. We currently store

Re: [webkit-dev] build.webkit.org down

2013-01-25 Thread Dirk Pranke
This is the output of the test bots, right? I'm guessing this is due to (a) us running pixel tests and (b) not checking in the expected failing baselines. If I ever get back to working on supporting -failing.png, this could go down *a lot*. Alternatively, we could just decide to check in the

Re: [webkit-dev] build.webkit.org down

2013-01-25 Thread William Siegrist
Yes, I'm referring to the test results that get uploaded to http://build.webkit.org/results/, presumably by the test slaves. The archives I refer to are http://build.webkit.org/archives/, which I believe are just the binaries built by the build slaves. -Bill On Jan 25, 2013, at 9:42 AM, Dirk

[webkit-dev] Do any ports still disable SVG?

2013-01-25 Thread Eric Seidel
This question came up in: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92393 Do any ports still disable SVG? Should we be removing the ENABLE_SVG defines (and potentially unifying SVG and HTML style resolve more closely)? ___ webkit-dev mailing list

Re: [webkit-dev] Do any ports still disable SVG?

2013-01-25 Thread Jochen Eisinger
Many chromium developers disable svg for faster building. Jochen ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

Re: [webkit-dev] Changing Github repository to mirror git.webkit.org (was Github vs. git.webkit.org)

2013-01-25 Thread Jesus Sanchez-Palencia
Sorry, we have been facing network issues here for the past few days... Anyway, should be fixed now and it is pushing the current git.webkit.org HEAD already. Cheers, jesus 2013/1/25 Florin Malita fmal...@google.com: Looks like mirroring stopped on 1/23 (last commit:

Re: [webkit-dev] WebIDL implementation plans (was: Re: Multiple inheritance in the DOM)

2013-01-25 Thread Glenn Adams
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote: There's no experiment that you can run using web content to detect whether we implement WebIDL. All you can detect is whether we implement particular specifications that use WebIDL. We can just simply not implement the

Re: [webkit-dev] Do any ports still disable SVG?

2013-01-25 Thread Antonio Gomes
QtWebKit has a --minimal option where SVG is disabled IIRC. On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Jochen Eisinger joc...@chromium.org wrote: Many chromium developers disable svg for faster building. Jochen ___ webkit-dev mailing list

Re: [webkit-dev] Do any ports still disable SVG?

2013-01-25 Thread Arunprasad Rajkumar
Eric, Most of the resource constraint environments(embedded systems) still disables the SVG. If the define is removed code size of WebKit will be increased by atleast 3 to 4M. On 26 January 2013 01:01, webkit-dev-requ...@lists.webkit.org wrote: This question came up

Re: [webkit-dev] build.webkit.org down

2013-01-25 Thread Tony Chang
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:30 AM, William Siegrist wsiegr...@apple.comwrote: Here are the largest results sets on the master in GB. We currently store 6.8TB of total results, going back 14 months, and 1.1TB of archives going back 1 week. 1500Apple MountainLion (Leaks) 1018Chromium

Re: [webkit-dev] Do any ports still disable SVG?

2013-01-25 Thread Elliott Sprehn
Perhaps the time to remove ENABLE_SVG is in several years once many pages depend on it and disabling it results in a busted browser... On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Arunprasad Rajkumar ararunpra...@gmail.com wrote: Eric, Most of the resource constraint environments(embedded systems) still

Re: [webkit-dev] WebIDL implementation plans (was: Re: Multiple inheritance in the DOM)

2013-01-25 Thread Dirk Schulze
On Jan 25, 2013, at 9:14 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote: On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote: This is a followup to the multiple inheritance discussion. Adam, I checked the IDL files on SVG2 [1]. The interfaces for SVG2 do not have multiple

Re: [webkit-dev] Do any ports still disable SVG?

2013-01-25 Thread Philip Rogers
We could reduce a bit of maintenance cost by removing all the defines. I ran some numbers and I'm not sure we are there yet in terms of lost productivity, even on the Chromium side. SVG adds around 20% to debug compile times: Linux, Z620, no goma, clean build, ninja, Debug DumpRenderTree, without

Re: [webkit-dev] WebIDL implementation plans (was: Re: Multiple inheritance in the DOM)

2013-01-25 Thread Adam Barth
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote: There's no experiment that you can run using web content to detect whether we implement WebIDL. All you can detect is whether we implement particular

Re: [webkit-dev] WebIDL implementation plans (was: Re: Multiple inheritance in the DOM)

2013-01-25 Thread Adam Barth
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote: On Jan 25, 2013, at 9:14 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote: On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote: This is a followup to the multiple inheritance discussion. Adam, I checked the IDL

Re: [webkit-dev] WebIDL implementation plans (was: Re: Multiple inheritance in the DOM)

2013-01-25 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:13 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote: On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote: On Jan 25, 2013, at 9:14 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote: On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote: This is a followup

Re: [webkit-dev] WebIDL implementation plans (was: Re: Multiple inheritance in the DOM)

2013-01-25 Thread Dirk Schulze
On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:23 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:13 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote: On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote: On Jan 25, 2013, at 9:14 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote: On Fri, Jan 25,

Re: [webkit-dev] WebIDL implementation plans (was: Re: Multiple inheritance in the DOM)

2013-01-25 Thread Elliott Sprehn
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote: On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:23 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:13 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote: On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote: On

Re: [webkit-dev] WebIDL implementation plans (was: Re: Multiple inheritance in the DOM)

2013-01-25 Thread Dirk Schulze
On Jan 25, 2013, at 8:16 PM, Elliott Sprehn espr...@chromium.org wrote: interface SVGViewSpec { readonly attribute SVGTransformList transform; readonly attribute SVGElement viewTarget; readonly attribute DOMString viewBoxString; readonly attribute DOMString

Re: [webkit-dev] WebIDL implementation plans (was: Re: Multiple inheritance in the DOM)

2013-01-25 Thread Elliott Sprehn
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote: ... The problem is that SVGFitToViewBox and SVGZoomAndPan of the example above are implemented by a lot of other interfaces as well. Supplemental is just supposed to be set once per interface. That is why Supplemental

Re: [webkit-dev] Do any ports still disable SVG?

2013-01-25 Thread Arunprasad Rajkumar
I agree with you guys. Most of the sites now uses SVG. But I'm worrying about the resource constraint platforms where browser is not intended for open Internet browsing, rather it is used for building user interfaces(like navigation systems, tv, set-top-box). Though using SVG in the constraints

Re: [webkit-dev] WebIDL implementation plans (was: Re: Multiple inheritance in the DOM)

2013-01-25 Thread Adam Barth
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Elliott Sprehn espr...@chromium.org wrote: On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote: ... The problem is that SVGFitToViewBox and SVGZoomAndPan of the example above are implemented by a lot of other interfaces as well. Supplemental