On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Benjamin Poulain benja...@webkit.org wrote:
I am sorry, I should have given more context.
There is visibly a growing discontent in the community about the cost
imposed from small ports. Just two weeks ago, there were 2 threads
discussing the cost of
My point is that I think that lots of ports are part of what makes
WebKit the goodness it is. Maybe I'm alone here, or at best part of a
minority, but I wanted us to not lose sight of this idea.
I totally agree. But I also agree with those, who thinks the different
ports should not overburden
On 02/12/2013 04:51 PM, Zeno Albisser wrote:
Hi,
I have been looking into the NetworkProcess code that has recently
been added to WebKit2. For Qt we are considering moving all the
networking into a separate thread within the UIProcess.
Do you guys think that the NetworkProcess code could be
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Balazs Kelemen kbal...@webkit.org wrote:
You also need IPC because the NetworkProcess serves the needs of the web
process. Could you describe why a network thread in the UI process fit your
needs bettter? Is it to support API's related to networking or does it
Dear WebKit-Dev,
I found an interesting difference between implementation of css 3d
transforms in Gecko (FireFox) and Chromium (WebKit). In Gecko, the
following css rule:
tranform: perspective(500px) rotateY(90)
rotates an element (let say an image) so that it is perpendicular to the
viewer,
On Feb 11, 2013, at 11:44 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
This entire email thread makes me sad.
I'm sad because we did this to ourselves (our porting systems/policies
are lacking), we did this very abruptly (the last port we kicked out
of webkit.org took a year?), and we don't have any clear
+shawnsingh
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Marcin Szamotulski msza...@gmail.comwrote:
Dear WebKit-Dev,
I found an interesting difference between implementation of css 3d
transforms in Gecko (FireFox) and Chromium (WebKit). In Gecko, the
following css rule:
tranform: perspective(500px)
He's dead, Jim:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107522
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
I think it's fine to shoot it in the head now. We do still want to come back
to it eventually, but it's now apparent that we won't in the next 1.5 months.
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org wrote:
This entire email thread makes me sad.
I'm sad because we did this to ourselves (our porting systems/policies
are lacking), we did this very abruptly (the last port we kicked out
of webkit.org took a year?), and we
Hi Marcin,
I wonder if you might accidentally have a perspective-origin set
differently? Or maybe there is something in your code where window size
that affects how the transforms appear? Maybe you can attach a reduced
simple example of the difference you're seeing? I just whipped up the
On Feb 12, 2013, at 8:28 AM, Zeno Albisser z...@webkit.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Balazs Kelemen kbal...@webkit.org wrote:
You also need IPC because the NetworkProcess serves the needs of the web
process. Could you describe why a network thread in the UI process fit your
Either way, I'd suggest you take this conversation to a specific bug report
:)
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Shawn Singh shawnsi...@chromium.orgwrote:
Hi Marcin,
I wonder if you might accidentally have a perspective-origin set
differently? Or maybe there is something in your code where
On Feb 12, 2013, at 12:00 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Feb 12, 2013, at 8:28 AM, Zeno Albisser z...@webkit.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Balazs Kelemen kbal...@webkit.org wrote:
You also need IPC because the NetworkProcess serves the needs of the web
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Kevin Ollivier kev...@theolliviers.comwrote:
On Feb 11, 2013, at 11:44 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
I think if we as a community are actively interested in maintaining as
many ports as we have (and welcoming new ones) we need to come up with
better ways to do
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Brady Eidson beid...@apple.com wrote:
We already support custom schemes on Mac by proxying the loading from the
networking process to the UI process.
I believe we do something like this for the libsoup port as well,
though network process support is still
I opened a new bug report:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109613
Best,
Marcin
On 12:07 Tue 12 Feb , Levi Weintraub wrote:
Either way, I'd suggest you take this conversation to a specific bug report
:)
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Shawn Singh shawnsi...@chromium.orgwrote:
16 matches
Mail list logo