On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi,
The style of CSS properties is either set in StyleBuilder/CSSProperty or
in StyleResolver (alias CSSStyleSelector).
StyleResolver has a giant switch statement to handle all CSS property
values and set the style. It
En 12/03/13 18:31, Ryosuke Niwa escribiu:
That doesn't work. At a bidi-level boundary, offset can jump from one
place to another. Consider a much simpler example; the same sequence of
letters, in logical order, ABC123 in a RTL block, which will be rendered as:
123CBA
with logical/DOM offsets
Hi,
currently, WebKit allows for an arbitrary number of new windows to be
created in response to a single user gesture. This is used for example to
create pop-unders.
In order to restrict the number of new windows to one per user gesture, a
port needs to invoke
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
On Apr 12, 2013, at 1:08 AM, Antti Koivisto koivi...@iki.fi wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com
wrote:
Hi,
The style of CSS properties is either set in StyleBuilder/CSSProperty
Is this for debug builds or for production builds?
If it is for debug builds, then adding file and line seems fine; we should do
it in a way that shares code with assertion macros.
If it is for production builds, then how do you debug other crashes?
-- Darin
I'm assuming that we agree that JavaScript must evolve to leverage the
hardware's power stingy parallelism. For completeness there seems to be the
following approaches.
1) Add nothing to the language and rely on increasingly sophisticated
compilers to detect opportunities to safely
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Sergio Villar Senin svil...@igalia.comwrote:
En 12/03/13 18:31,
- R. Niwa
escribiu:
That doesn't work. At a bidi-level boundary, offset can jump from one
place to another. Consider a much simpler example; the same sequence of
letters, in logical order,
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Sergio Villar Senin svil...@igalia.comwrote:
I know that WK follows the NSTextView implementation but FF for example
does not show the remote insert issue.
Yes, it does. Firefox simply uses heuristics to guess which type of
character LTR/RTL you're about to
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Sergio Villar Senin
svil...@igalia.comwrote:
I know that WK follows the NSTextView implementation but FF for example
does not show the remote insert issue.
Yes, it does. Firefox
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Sergio Villar Senin svil...@igalia.com
wrote:
I know that WK follows the NSTextView implementation but FF for example
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Shezan Baig shezbaig...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Sergio Villar Senin
svil...@igalia.com
On Apr 12, 2013, at 8:36 AM, Hudson, Rick rick.hud...@intel.com wrote:
I'm assuming that we agree that JavaScript must evolve to leverage the
hardware's power stingy parallelism.
True, but there is also the question of how high of a priority we should give
to this relative to other project
En 12/04/13 19:00, Ryosuke Niwa escribiu:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Sergio Villar Senin svil...@igalia.com
Well, I have a pretty compact patch more or less ready to be uploaded to
bz that in the case of the caret being placed at (3) just draws the
classical 1px width bar (it
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Sergio Villar Senin svil...@igalia.comwrote:
En 12/04/13 19:00, Ryosuke Niwa escribiu:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Sergio Villar Senin svil...@igalia.com
Well, I have a pretty compact patch more or less ready to be
uploaded to
bz that in the
On Apr 12, 2013, at 5:05 AM, Jochen Eisinger joc...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi,
currently, WebKit allows for an arbitrary number of new windows to be created
in response to a single user gesture. This is used for example to create
pop-unders.
In order to restrict the number of new windows
Argh, sending from the right address this time.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Jarred Nicholls
jarred.nicho...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 12, 2013, at 8:36 AM, Hudson, Rick rick.hud...@intel.com
wrote:
I'm assuming that
On Apr 12, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Jarred Nicholls jarred.nicho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 12, 2013, at 8:36 AM, Hudson, Rick rick.hud...@intel.com wrote:
I'm assuming that we agree that JavaScript must evolve to leverage the
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:05 AM, Jochen Eisinger joc...@chromium.orgwrote:
currently, WebKit allows for an arbitrary number of new windows to be
created in response to a single user gesture. This is used for example to
create pop-unders.
In order to restrict the number of new windows to one
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 12, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Jarred Nicholls jarred.nicho...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote:
For as little worth as it is, I agree with you Filip that providing
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Brady Eidson beid...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 12, 2013, at 5:05 AM, Jochen Eisinger joc...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi,
currently, WebKit allows for an arbitrary number of new windows to be
created in response to a single user gesture. This is used for example
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Benjamin Poulain benja...@webkit.orgwrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:05 AM, Jochen Eisinger joc...@chromium.orgwrote:
currently, WebKit allows for an arbitrary number of new windows to be
created in response to a single user gesture. This is used for example
On Apr 12, 2013, at 1:59 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 12, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Jarred Nicholls jarred.nicho...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote:
Hello,
Was reading the coding-style documentation. Have just one question concerning
C++ null pointer value. Quoting the coding-style docs, In C++, the null pointer
value should be written as 0.
My question is: Doesn't xcode clang now support features like nullptr? Shouldn't
the coding-style
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Karen Shaeffer shaef...@neuralscape.comwrote:
Was reading the coding-style documentation. Have just one question
concerning
C++ null pointer value. Quoting the coding-style docs, In C++, the null
pointer
value should be written as 0.
My question is: Doesn't
On Saturday 13 April 2013, Karen Shaeffer wrote:
Hello,
Was reading the coding-style documentation. Have just one question
concerning C++ null pointer value. Quoting the coding-style docs, In C++,
the null pointer value should be written as 0.
My question is: Doesn't xcode clang now support
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 03:41:17PM -0700, Benjamin Poulain wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Karen Shaeffer
shaef...@neuralscape.comwrote:
Was reading the coding-style documentation. Have just one question
concerning
C++ null pointer value. Quoting the coding-style docs, In C++,
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Karen Shaeffer shaef...@neuralscape.comwrote:
Of course, I understand that. But there is a huge opportunity cost to
webkit.
The c++11 standard also rewrites the entire standard library. I have been
using
g++ 4.7.2 using -stdc++11 in my work with linux. And
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Karen Shaeffer shaef...@neuralscape.comwrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 03:41:17PM -0700, Benjamin Poulain wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Karen Shaeffer
shaef...@neuralscape.comwrote:
Was reading the coding-style documentation. Have just one
On Apr 12, 2013, at 3:33 PM, Karen Shaeffer shaef...@neuralscape.com wrote:
Shouldn't the coding-style documentation be updated to use nullptr?
We may want to update the guidelines to tell people to use nullptr where it
works. We definitely put some effort into making it usable in certain
12 апр. 2013 г., в 13:58, Benjamin Poulain benja...@webkit.org написал(а):
In https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114379 I add this for WK2 and for
WK1 mac/win.
Are other ports interested in this behavior? If not, I'd just skip the
corresponding tests.
I am confused.
Why do you
On Apr 12, 2013, at 4:09 PM, Karen Shaeffer shaef...@neuralscape.com wrote:
Of course, I understand that. But there is a huge opportunity cost to webkit.
The c++11 standard also rewrites the entire standard library. I have been
using
g++ 4.7.2 using -stdc++11 in my work with linux. And
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 12, 2013, at 4:09 PM, Karen Shaeffer shaef...@neuralscape.com
wrote:
As others have said, we are definitely eager to use C++11 across the board
but are limited by compiler support requirements.
One thing that
On Apr 12, 2013, at 2:13 PM, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 12, 2013, at 1:59 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 12, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Jarred Nicholls jarred.nicho...@gmail.com
wrote:
On
From the CMake thread, I got that MSVC 2010 will soon be the oldest version
supported. Is that correct?
It looks like that might be the case although I still need to test cmake on the
AppleWin port to confirm that’s it’s okay.
Assuming that we do make use of cmake I’m still not quite sure
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote:
I'm curious: would you want to use ParallelArray, if you had the
flexibility of building a different abstraction?
I find ParallelArray to be an awkward abstraction to begin with. I like
work queues and such. The whole
A message passing model a la Web Workers has some advantages compared to
threads with shared mutable state and locks:
- No possibility of deadlock
- No possibility of corrupting data structures due to races
- No performance penalty from correctly supporting fine-grained concurrent
access to
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Zoltan Herczeg zherc...@webkit.org wrote:
A message passing model a la Web Workers has some advantages compared to
threads with shared mutable state and locks:
- No possibility of deadlock
- No possibility of corrupting data structures due to races
- No
On Apr 12, 2013, at 6:35 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 12, 2013, at 2:13 PM, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 12, 2013, at 1:59 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 12,
On Apr 12, 2013, at 9:46 PM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Zoltan Herczeg zherc...@webkit.org wrote:
A message passing model a la Web Workers has some advantages compared to
threads with shared mutable state and locks:
- No possibility of
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 12, 2013, at 1:59 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 12, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Jarred Nicholls jarred.nicho...@gmail.com
wrote:
On
On Apr 12, 2013, at 10:43 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 12, 2013, at 1:59 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 12,
On Apr 12, 2013, at 7:03 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Filip Pizlo fpi...@apple.com wrote:
I'm curious: would you want to use ParallelArray, if you had the flexibility
of building a different abstraction?
I find ParallelArray to be an awkward
Am 13.04.2013 um 03:22 schrieb Benjamin Poulain:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Apr 12, 2013, at 4:09 PM, Karen Shaeffer shaef...@neuralscape.com wrote:
As others have said, we are definitely eager to use C++11 across the board
but are limited
43 matches
Mail list logo
