Re: [webkit-dev] compact ICU unicode

2013-06-14 Thread Martin Robinson
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Laszlo Gombos wrote: > Qt port of WebKit trunk can only be built with Qt v5, which has a hard > dependency on ICU. Older version of Qt and WebKit (v4.8) had an option to > build with or without ICU. See [1] an [2] for more background information. Given that Qt now

Re: [webkit-dev] compact ICU unicode

2013-06-14 Thread Laszlo Gombos
Hi Mark, >> I think some Qt port's platform doesn't use ICU either so you might want to coordinate with their maintainer to do this. In fact, WTF had an abstraction layer around ICU to do this the last time I checked. Qt port of WebKit trunk can only be built with Qt v5, which has a hard depende

Re: [webkit-dev] Web Inspector

2013-06-14 Thread Timothy Hatcher
Sorry for the duplicate message. ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

[webkit-dev] Web Inspector

2013-06-14 Thread Timothy Hatcher
On Tuesday the Safari team upstreamed the Safari Web Inspector to WebKit as a new top-level project — WebInspectorUI. This version of Web Inspector is nearly two years in the making. We now feel it is time to share our hard work with the WebKit project and further accelerate developer tool innov

Re: [webkit-dev] compact ICU unicode

2013-06-14 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Salisbury, Mark wrote: > > What would people think about including specific ICU data tables in WTF in > order to provide a lightweight (but functional) unicode implementation? > I don't think we want to do that. Maintaining such a table will be a nightmare for us.

Re: [webkit-dev] compact ICU unicode

2013-06-14 Thread Salisbury, Mark
Thanks Glenn for the feedback. I rather like how Torch Mobile slimmed it down back in '09 for porting to WinCE, but if the primary concern is architectural purity / long term maintainability -- that argument makes sense and I can see why we don't want to muddy WTF with it. At the same time, IC