Sorry about the delay in responding, the last couple of days have been crazy.
We have been working on fixing both the tests and any bugs in the
implementation. It sounds like we should bring this up again once we've
finished that work.
However, to answer Sam's question about other implementations, Chrome and Opera
have shipped unprefixed, and we're keeping the Blink Implementation in sync
with the WebKit one, including importing the CSSWG test suite for shapes.
Firefox and IE have not shipped an implementation yet, but both have given us
positive signals.
Thanks for the feedback,
Bem
On Oct 29, 2014, at 23:17, Benjamin Poulain benja...@webkit.org wrote:
Any update on this?
There are a quite a few open bugs for CSS shapes. A lot of tests are skipped
too: http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/LayoutTests/TestExpectations#L137
CSS Shapes is really neat, it would be great to polish the implementation and
unprefix.
Benjamin
On 10/27/14, 11:46 AM, Sam Weinig wrote:
Can you give us an overview of what other browsers have shipped CSS Shapes
and how interoperable they are (e.g are they all passing a shared test
suite)?
-Sam
On Oct 27, 2014, at 11:42 AM, Bem Jones-Bey bjone...@adobe.com wrote:
Hey all,
Chrome shipped CSS Shapes un-prefixed. The spec has been in CR for awhile
now, with no changes in behavior. I keep on coming across content that uses
CSS Shapes but doesn't use the prefixed version, so it doesn't work in
Safari. Any objections to enabling un-prefixxed versions of CSS Shapes
properties in WebKit?
- Bem
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
