On 24/04/17 21:02, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>
> 24.04.2017, 21:10, "Alex Christensen" :
>> Thanks for the data, Carlos! This is a growing problem that is hurting
>> productivity. We’ve discussed it a bit and haven’t done enough about it.
>> Here are some of the ideas
For the macOS and iOS ports, we have the additional problem of overhead from
the build system. Our make+xcodebuild based system takes a surprisingly long
time even for a no-op build, or for a small incremental "just changed this one
implementation file" build.
There's also some indication
24.04.2017, 21:10, "Alex Christensen" :
> Thanks for the data, Carlos! This is a growing problem that is hurting
> productivity. We’ve discussed it a bit and haven’t done enough about it. Here
> are some of the ideas I’ve heard:
>
> 1) Reduce #includes by doing more
> On Apr 24, 2017, at 11:15, JF Bastien wrote:
>
> 1) Reduce #includes by doing more forward declaring and less inlining. We
> would probably need link time optimization to not lose performance benefits
> of inlining functions in headers.
>
>
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Alex Christensen
wrote:
> Thanks for the data, Carlos! This is a growing problem that is hurting
> productivity. We’ve discussed it a bit and haven’t done enough about it.
> Here are some of the ideas I’ve heard:
>
> 1) Reduce #includes
Thanks for the data, Carlos! This is a growing problem that is hurting
productivity. We’ve discussed it a bit and haven’t done enough about it. Here
are some of the ideas I’ve heard:
1) Reduce #includes by doing more forward declaring and less inlining. We
would probably need link time
Le 24/04/2017 à 17:57, Brady Eidson a écrit :
>> I do *not* support adding another client of the C API, even in the
>> interim.
>
> It would be easier for us to move to the new API after the port is
> upstream, since it will require refactorings in both ports GTK+ and WPE
> . So, we can simply
Hello,
I am hopping in as a WPE user.
The WPE port is gaining momentum in the set-top box world, and mainly
within the RDK consortium, which gathers many cable/TV/network operators
and software vendors.
The company I work for plans to deploy WPE on hundreds of thousands
set-top boxes soon,
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Brady Eidson
wrote:
In the coming weeks I am actually likely to be changing and/or
removing at least a few functions from the C-API.
As long as the WPE upstreaming effort is comfortable with the idea
that I might be breaking them as they
Hi,
Inspired by a similar thread on the Chromium mailing lists [1], I have
measured the build times of WebKitGTK+ over the past 2.5 years.
I benchmarked two different compilers (GCC and Clang).
The summary is: since September 2014 the time for building WebKitGTK+
has increased in a 62% for GCC
> On Apr 24, 2017, at 2:31 AM, Carlos Garcia Campos wrote:
>
> El dom, 23-04-2017 a las 22:12 -0700, Brady Eidson escribió:
>>> On Apr 22, 2017, at 6:21 AM, Michael Catanzaro >> om> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think Carlos's plan to reuse the non-GTK+ bits of the
El dom, 23-04-2017 a las 22:12 -0700, Brady Eidson escribió:
> > On Apr 22, 2017, at 6:21 AM, Michael Catanzaro > om> wrote:
> >
> > I think Carlos's plan to reuse the non-GTK+ bits of the GTK+ API
> > would be much better for us.
>
> I as long as the GTK and WPE ports
El sáb, 22-04-2017 a las 08:09 -0500, Michael Catanzaro escribió:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 1:14 AM, Carlos Garcia Campos
> wrote:
> > The easiest way would be to reuse the GTK+ API. WPE has the same
> > dependencies than the GTK+ port except for GTK+ itself. The GTK+
> >
Hi all,
After talking with some WebKittens, I'd like to discuss the process of
upstreaming WPT tests from WebKit. Here is my take of it.
WPT tests need a review before being merged.
This review can be done in WPT GitHub at PR time.
This review can also be done as part of the usual WebKit review
14 matches
Mail list logo