Re: [webkit-dev] WebKit Contributors Meeting 2014 - UPDATED DATES

I’ll only be at the meeting on Tuesday (I’ve already booked the flight back to Seattle and vacation starting Wednesday). So I’ll be lurking in the vicinity on Monday - if anyone has suggestions on a good place to hang out nearby (good wifi, perhaps espresso?) please contact me off-list. Thanks,

Re: [webkit-dev] Feature removal: CSS variables

Andreas, Don't take the ranking in that poll as an indicator. There's no way to compare interest in Variables against the other specifications, as it was omitted from the original poll and the only data points are from write-ins. That's what the gray styling means in the page you linked. I have n

Re: [webkit-dev] New feature: CSS3 GCPM

On 8/20/12 10:07 AM, "David Hyatt" wrote: >On Aug 20, 2012, at 11:32 AM, Peter Beverloo wrote: > > >Addendum: The current Editor's Draft is significant different from the >published WD, and includes something similar to CSS Exclusions. Since >Adobe is implementing these in WebKit, it may be good

Re: [webkit-dev] Multiple inheritance in the DOM

On 7/26/12 3:15 PM, "Adam Barth" wrote: > >On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Alan Stearns wrote: > >On 7/26/12 2:36 PM, "Adam Barth" wrote: >... >> >> >>Discussing this issue with Sam in #webkit, we wondered whether another >>soluti

Re: [webkit-dev] Multiple inheritance in the DOM

On 7/26/12 2:36 PM, "Adam Barth" wrote: > >On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Alexandru Chiculita >wrote: > >I don't see any advantage in having the interface anyway, so why don't we >just it let be a separate object and add two helper methods instead. I >can only imagine that other browsers might

Re: [webkit-dev] Multiple inheritance in the DOM

From: Adam Barth Date: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 6:05 PM To: Sam Weinig Cc: Elliott Sprehn , Alan Stearns , Kentaro Hara , "webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org" Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Multiple inheritance in the DOM On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Sam Weinig wrote: On Jul 25, 201

Re: [webkit-dev] Multiple inheritance in the DOM

On 7/25/12 6:12 PM, "Sam Weinig" wrote: > >On Jul 25, 2012, at 5:37 PM, Sam Weinig wrote: > >> >> On Jul 25, 2012, at 5:13 PM, Alan Stearns wrote: >> >>> On 7/25/12 4:49 PM, "Kentaro Hara" wrote: >>> >

Re: [webkit-dev] Multiple inheritance in the DOM

On 7/25/12 5:37 PM, "Sam Weinig" wrote: > >On Jul 25, 2012, at 5:13 PM, Alan Stearns wrote: > >> On 7/25/12 4:49 PM, "Kentaro Hara" wrote: >> >>>>>>> A) Should we push back on the folks writing the CSS Regions >>>>>&

Re: [webkit-dev] Multiple inheritance in the DOM

On 7/25/12 4:49 PM, "Kentaro Hara" wrote: > A) Should we push back on the folks writing the CSS Regions > specification to avoid using multiple inheritance? As far as I know, > this is the only instance of multiple inheritance in the platform. > Historically, EventTarget

Re: [webkit-dev] About WebIDL supplemental interfaces

Adam, Currently, an Element is the only thing represented in the object model that can become a CSS Region. Pseudo-elements (::before and ::after) can become CSS Regions, but AFAIK there isn't yet a representation of those in the OM. I'm hoping this changes in the future (I'm working on a spec th

Re: [webkit-dev] Web APIs and class name collisions

The spec itself consistently and deliberately calls them "CSS Regions," so a CSS prefix could be appropriate. Thanks, Alan From: Adam Barth mailto:aba...@webkit.org>> To: Andrei Bucur mailto:abu...@adobe.com>> Cc: "webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org" mailto:webkit

Re: [webkit-dev] CSS 2.1 Test Suite

The best way to judge whether a reference result is correct is to submit the result to the W3C CSS 2.1 test suite and have it reviewed. The only way this test suite will get more reference results is if people like us volunteer to submit references. If it's useful to us to have these 'homebrew refe

Re: [webkit-dev] Test conversion to use W3C testharness.js

I’m told that changes to the file are meant to be backwards-compatible. The API should not change, except to add new methods. On 3/9/12 2:28 PM, "Jacob Goldstein" wrote: I recently uploaded a patch to https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80709 which converted an existing JavaScript regions

Re: [webkit-dev] Style bot complains of missing binary data in diff when deleting .png test results

Alan On 11/30/11 5:36 PM, "David Levin" wrote: Perhaps you could give a bug that has an example of what you are talking about. For me it is hard to guess at what the complaint by the style bot is. dave On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Alan Stearns wrote: If I delete a .png test

[webkit-dev] Style bot complains of missing binary data in diff when deleting .png test results

If I delete a .png test result and I make a git diff without using the --binary flag, the style EWS bot complains. I can see why it would complain if I were rebasing the file - you need the binary data to see what's changed. It makes less sense to me to add the binary data to the diff if the file

Re: [webkit-dev] Supporting w3c ref tests and changing our convention

On 11/14/11 12:07 PM, "Ryosuke Niwa" wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Darin Adler wrote: >> We may find we can automate (3) with a script. It sounds pretty mechanical. > > It appears that W3C mandates author name, etc... be included in the meta data > as well but I guess we can add so

Re: [webkit-dev] Supporting w3c ref tests and changing our convention

On 11/4/11 7:20 PM, "Ojan Vafai" wrote: > On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: I am, but I'm particularly concerned about W3C tests. It'll be nice if we had exa

Re: [webkit-dev] Putting layout tests on a separate repository (was "Supporting w3c ref tests and changing our convention")

On 11/4/11 3:09 PM, "Ryan Leavengood" wrote: > On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: >> >> Indeed, I'm against this idea. > > You make good points. There may be solutions to your objections, but > they might not be much better than having a slow git status right now. > > Do othe

Re: [webkit-dev] Using inline-block divs for line breaking tests

On 8/24/11 1:52 PM, "Dan Bernstein" wrote: > > On Aug 24, 2011, at 1:08 PM, Alan Stearns wrote: > >> ... Idea for platform-proofing some DumpRenderTree results > > You can make a text-only test that uses Ahem (you can still rely on its > horizontal metrics, a

[webkit-dev] Using inline-block divs for line breaking tests

I have an idea for writing LayoutTests where what's being tested are line breaks. Take the case of this recent bug fix: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 The problem here was that if you had a left float and text-indent combined, the text-indent was not being considered in the line br

[webkit-dev] Location of tests for new CSS features (regions and exclusions)

There are two patches in the works for regions and exclusions that include tests: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61726 https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61730 The patches started with tests in these paths: LayoutTests/fast/regions LayoutTests/fast/exclusions But during the respon

Re: [webkit-dev] The case for disallowing alerts in unload, redux

On 6/26/11 12:10 PM, "Adam Barth" wrote: > It would be useful to know what fraction of those users would have > a better experience with this change. Sreeram, of the example sites that > you've seen, how many would be improved by suppressing > these alerts? One example of a useful confirm (I th

Re: [webkit-dev] Adding CSS Regions and Exclusions to WebKit

On 5/26/11 3:08 PM, "David Hyatt" wrote: On May 26, 2011, at 4:31 PM, Eric Seidel wrote: I appreciate that you've followed the master-bug idiom which is so common in bugs.webkit.org these days! I also would *strongly* encourage you to post your changes in as small of