On Nov 14, 2008, at 4:01 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Nov 14, 2008, at 9:15 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
On Nov 14, 2008, at 12:24 AM, browserwk wrote:
Before list, i assume html page have only one img and map(also
one
area) tag, but also they are bounded.
In order to focus navigate via
Hi Maciej,
On Nov 14, 2008, at 5:07 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Nov 14, 2008, at 2:48 PM, Rob Burns wrote:
On Nov 14, 2008, at 4:01 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
One particularly wrong aspect of the original assumption is that
in practice, a single map and all its areas can be used
Hi Maciej,
On Nov 14, 2008, at 5:07 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Nov 14, 2008, at 2:48 PM, Rob Burns wrote:
On Nov 14, 2008, at 4:01 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
One particularly wrong aspect of the original assumption is that
in practice, a single map and all its areas can be used
Hi Peter,
On Oct 2, 2008, at 6:28 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:23 AM, Rob Burns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As another drastic anecdotal step, I've turned off javascript on
Safari (my main browser) and turn to other browsers when I find a site
that requires javascript. If I
Hi Darin,
On Oct 3, 2008, at 9:37 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Oct 2, 2008, at 10:09 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
(I don't understand your
Hi Peter,
On Oct 3, 2008, at 12:21 PM, Rob Burns wrote:
On Oct 2, 2008, at 6:28 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:23 AM, Rob Burns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As another drastic anecdotal step, I've turned off javascript on
Safari (my main browser) and turn to other browsers
HI Darin,
On Oct 3, 2008, at 1:22 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:10 AM, Rob Burns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Darin,
On Oct 3, 2008, at 9:37 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Oct 2, 2008, at 10:09 PM
HI Maciej,
On Oct 3, 2008, at 3:16 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Oct 3, 2008, at 3:10 AM, Rob Burns wrote:
Hi Darin,
On Oct 3, 2008, at 9:37 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Oct 2, 2008, at 10:09 PM, Darin Fisher
Hi Geoff,
On Oct 3, 2008, at 9:04 PM, Geoffrey Garen wrote:
Again, I'm wondering how many legitimate uses are there for short
timeouts in background tabs/windows.
In a background window:
animation
video
For animation and video, is it necessary even in a completely obscured
view?
On Oct 2, 2008, at 6:01 AM, Linus Upson wrote:
My impression from your remarks was that you thought 1ms is working
fine
1ms is definitely not working fine for me. I've started reading the
Washington Post since NYT makes my fan whir.
As another drastic anecdotal step, I've turned off
Hi Peter,
On Sep 30, 2008, at 8:42 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
2008/9/30 Mike Belshe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As for keeping the fan off - if we could keep the CPU idle a 3ms
minimum timeout loop does that resolve your concern?
Followup to my earlier post, based on this.
I realize that one reason
On Jul 22, 2008, at 10:26 AM, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
Dan Wood wrote:
Yeah, that's one approach but it is way overkill for many needs, and
invokes threads that aren't what you want for a simple function, and
also only go from named entity into rendered Unicode character, and
not the
Hi Andre,
On Jun 24, 2008, at 5:04 PM, Andre-John Mas wrote:
Because of the move to resolution independence on the Mac, I decided
to see what would happen if I indicated a table using centimeters.
What I found is that what was indicated was not what was displayed.
The computer being used for
Hi Alexey,On Nov 10, 2007, at 1:42 AM, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote:on 10.11.2007 01:55, Rob Burns at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:However, I think its better to show all of the standardswhether targeted by Apple or not. There are a lot of specifications out there - how would you decide whetherone
Hi Maciej,
On Nov 9, 2007, at 5:07 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Nov 9, 2007, at 5:55 PM, Rob Burns wrote:
Hello all,
I have to say I like Philippe's version of the page better. I think
it is more appropriate for an open source project like webkit. I
would agree with Maciej
Hi Mahesh,
On Aug 18, 2007, at 3:01 AM, Mark Rowe wrote:
On 18/08/2007, at 7:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We can use userAgent string in HTTP request to identify. Thought it
might not be there already, but iPhone browser people can think of
sending string iPhone and
Hi Mahesh,
I'm wondering what problem you're trying to solve that cookies
don't solve.
BTW, I added Webkitsdk-dev to this email since I think that's the
more appropriate place to discuss this. I'm leaving Webkit-dev@ on
here too since I don't know who the original poster was. Replies
Hi Nicholas and Peter,
That is great (though ironic) to hear that this feature's been there
all along (at least in the spec and in the server). I wonder if you
(Nicholas) could write up or point to some instructions on
configuring that in Apache (ideally the exact lines to add to the
Its not easy to do these days. In my opinion, this is one of the key
features needed for an HTTP 1.2 (along with event/change
notifications and a few other things). Apache can probably be
configured to do this, but I'm not sure that there's a way to easily
get the HTTP clients to request
On Jun 6, 2007, at 12:01 AM, Windy Road wrote:
On 06/06/07, Wesley Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Overlooking for the moment the problem Dave H raised, what would the
rendering engine be aiming to do with the text when font-size was
auto? I assume this is to make the resolution independent
I started to post a reaply on this bug on HTML/CSS column issues,
when it grew to more listserv length post. So here it is.
I'm not totally clear why these table column issues are plaguing so
many browsers. I'm not yet that familiar with the WebKit codebase,
but the problems with
21 matches
Mail list logo
