ToolmakerSteve wrote:
>
> If you read through the end of the thread to see what I already posted
> later on,
>
Oops -- somehow I didn't previously see the Nabble alert for your [Akos]
comment that I just responded to. I see that it was written a while back,
before I had s
Akos Kiss-2 wrote:
>
> Oh, you must be surely right. Let's stop all alternative development
> works. The new motto is: "One size fits all".
>
> BR,
> -Akos
>
> PS: Sorry, I could not refrain from responding.
>
No worries. If you read through the end of the thread to see what I already
poste
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> Also, while the Tamarin project is an interesting piece of technology,
> let's be careful not to oversell it. Tamarin only provides half of a
> JavaScript engine (the execution engine but not a parser/compiler to
> generate the bytecodes), it cannot yet handle
Akos Kiss-2 wrote:
>
> we got interested in speeding up the
> JavaScript engine of WebKit.
>
But, But, the world is moving on to ECMAScript 4 / Javascript 2. Does it
make sense to do anything other than to use, and to help improve, the open
source Mozilla/Tamarin codebase? That will give you t
4 matches
Mail list logo
