Re: [webkit-dev] C stack direction

2013-11-22 Thread Brent Fulgham
On Nov 21, 2013, at 2:14 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote: On Nov 21, 2013, at 5:33 AM, Steven Coul (scoul) sc...@cisco.com wrote: But since it's WTF functionality that isn't being used in another component atm. I would tend to keep it. Actually, we wouldn’t do that. WTF is only

Re: [webkit-dev] C stack direction

2013-11-21 Thread Steven Coul (scoul)
:25 PM To: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org Development Subject: [webkit-dev] C stack direction Hi folks, I'm currently doing some work involving checks on the bounds of the native stack. According to WTF::StackBounds, it appears that WINCE is the only port that can potentially have a stack that grows

Re: [webkit-dev] C stack direction

2013-11-21 Thread Darin Adler
On Nov 21, 2013, at 5:33 AM, Steven Coul (scoul) sc...@cisco.com wrote: But since it's WTF functionality that isn't being used in another component atm. I would tend to keep it. Actually, we wouldn’t do that. WTF is only for WebKit, not intended to be a general purpose library. We don’t keep

[webkit-dev] C stack direction

2013-11-20 Thread Mark Lam
Hi folks, I’m currently doing some work involving checks on the bounds of the native stack. According to WTF::StackBounds, it appears that WINCE is the only port that can potentially have a stack that grows up. Is anyone still building, testing, and using this configuration with an upward