Re: [webkit-dev] New Qt buildbots
I'm strongly in favor of more builders. However, it would be nice if the builders on build.webkit.org's front-page were all builders we were actually supposed to keep green. Right now Windows, Qt and Gtk builders at build.webkit.org are red and mostly ignored by the project. Would these new builders be green, or mostly ignored like the existing Qt builders? Perhaps build.webkit.org should have a multi-page setup like how build.chromium.org does where the main page is builders that are expected to be green, and other pages are FYI were builders may or may not always be green. -eric On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Gabor Rapcsanyi rga...@inf.u-szeged.hu wrote: Hi! We have some stable Qt bots on http://www.sed.hu/webkit/qtbuildbot/ which we would like to connect to the Apple buildbot master. The bot names are: x86-32 Windows Qt Release - QtWebKit release build on x86-32 architecture x86-32 Windows Qt Debug - QtWebKit debug build on x86-32 architecture x86-32 Linux Qt Release Minimal - QtWebKit release build with --minimal switch ARMv7 Linux Qt Release - QtWebKit release build on ARMv7 architecture ARMv5 Linux Qt Release - QtWebKit release build on ARMv5 architecture These bots are stable and only build now, doesn't do any tests yet. If you have any question about the bots we can discuss here. Regards, Gabor ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] New Qt buildbots
On Apr 9, 2010, at 1:02 AM, Eric Seidel wrote: I'm strongly in favor of more builders. However, it would be nice if the builders on build.webkit.org's front-page were all builders we were actually supposed to keep green. Right now Windows, Qt and Gtk builders at build.webkit.org are red and mostly ignored by the project. Would these new builders be green, or mostly ignored like the existing Qt builders? Perhaps build.webkit.org should have a multi-page setup like how build.chromium.org does where the main page is builders that are expected to be green, and other pages are FYI were builders may or may not always be green. I would support a multi-page setup like this. - Maciej -eric On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Gabor Rapcsanyi rga...@inf.u-szeged.hu wrote: Hi! We have some stable Qt bots on http://www.sed.hu/webkit/qtbuildbot/ which we would like to connect to the Apple buildbot master. The bot names are: x86-32 Windows Qt Release - QtWebKit release build on x86-32 architecture x86-32 Windows Qt Debug - QtWebKit debug build on x86-32 architecture x86-32 Linux Qt Release Minimal - QtWebKit release build with -- minimal switch ARMv7 Linux Qt Release - QtWebKit release build on ARMv7 architecture ARMv5 Linux Qt Release - QtWebKit release build on ARMv5 architecture These bots are stable and only build now, doesn't do any tests yet. If you have any question about the bots we can discuss here. Regards, Gabor ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] New Qt buildbots
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 01:20 -0700, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: Perhaps build.webkit.org should have a multi-page setup like how build.chromium.org does where the main page is builders that are expected to be green, and other pages are FYI were builders may or may not always be green. I would support a multi-page setup like this. I would support that as well, given that we have 4 bots, and some of them are difficult to keep green at all times. Thanks, -- Gustavo Noronha Silva g...@gnome.org GNOME Project ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] New Qt buildbots
Hi, Of course we would like to add only very stable bots to build.webkit.org . The bots in question are two Windows builders (release and debug), one Linux builder (release with --minimal option, which guards the #ifded guards) and two ARM-Linux builders (ARMv5, ARMv7). The URL that Gábor showed wasn't the best one, because you could also see our experimental (maybe red) layout bots. Here you can check our stable bots: http://alturl.com/jtc9 These bots have a history of several months, they are stable enough, and green almost all the time. Flakey tests are irrelevant, because they are only builder bots and don't run layout test. Furthermore we agree that a multi-page setup would be more useful, and things like console view is more scalable than waterfall. br, Ossy Eric Seidel írta: I'm strongly in favor of more builders. However, it would be nice if the builders on build.webkit.org's front-page were all builders we were actually supposed to keep green. Right now Windows, Qt and Gtk builders at build.webkit.org are red and mostly ignored by the project. Would these new builders be green, or mostly ignored like the existing Qt builders? Perhaps build.webkit.org should have a multi-page setup like how build.chromium.org does where the main page is builders that are expected to be green, and other pages are FYI were builders may or may not always be green. -eric ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
