> On Sep 27, 2019, at 10:08 PM, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote:
>
> And, to be clear, we _can_ fix these compat issues, some way or another.
>
> One thought is to limit the amount of scroll adjustments without user
> scrolling or stuff like that, which would prevent the "you get stuck on the
>
On Friday 2019-09-27 14:23 +0200, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote:
> Does anyone have strong opinions against removing scroll anchoring from
> Gecko, based on the above?
It seems pretty sad, since I think it's a very useful feature for a
large class of pages -- particularly pages that are more
On Sunday 2019-09-29 10:54 +1000, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> How useful is scroll anchoring outside of the two cases mentioned in
> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-scroll-anchoring/#intro i.e. images loading and
> ad iframes being inserted? Would it be feasible to make scroll anchoring a
> much
And, to be clear, we _can_ fix these compat issues, some way or another.
One thought is to limit the amount of scroll adjustments without user
scrolling or stuff like that, which would prevent the "you get stuck on
the page".
Making anchoring opt-in rather than opt-out is another option, but
4 matches
Mail list logo
