[webkit-dev] Best practices for PLATFORM(X) vs. HAVE(X) vs. USE(X) vs. ENABLE(X)? (was: Best practices for USE(X) vs. ENABLE(X)?)

On Nov 12, 2008, at 4:35 PM, Adam Roben wrote: Hi everyone- Recently I've been wondering when it's appropriate to use USE(X) vs. ENABLE(X), for a given feature/capability X. My impression is that we currently use ENABLE(X) far more than USE(X). How does one decide which one to choose?

Re: [webkit-dev] Best practices for PLATFORM(X) vs. HAVE(X) vs. USE(X) vs. ENABLE(X)? (was: Best practices for USE(X) vs. ENABLE(X)?)

On Nov 12, 2008, at 1:44 PM, Adam Roben wrote: I guess while we're at it we might as well clear up the meaning of PLATFORM(X) and HAVE(X), as well. I believe PLATFORM is for large scale questions like What kind of compiler is this? And HAVE is for smaller scale questions like Does this

Re: [webkit-dev] Best practices for PLATFORM(X) vs. HAVE(X) vs. USE(X) vs. ENABLE(X)? (was: Best practices for USE(X) vs. ENABLE(X)?)

On Nov 12, 2008, at 4:57 PM, Darin Adler wrote: On Nov 12, 2008, at 1:44 PM, Adam Roben wrote: I guess while we're at it we might as well clear up the meaning of PLATFORM(X) and HAVE(X), as well. I believe PLATFORM is for large scale questions like What kind of compiler is this? For

Re: [webkit-dev] Best practices for PLATFORM(X) vs. HAVE(X) vs. USE(X) vs. ENABLE(X)? (was: Best practices for USE(X) vs. ENABLE(X)?)

On Nov 12, 2008, at 2:07 PM, Adam Roben wrote: On Nov 12, 2008, at 4:57 PM, Darin Adler wrote: On Nov 12, 2008, at 1:44 PM, Adam Roben wrote: I guess while we're at it we might as well clear up the meaning of PLATFORM(X) and HAVE(X), as well. I believe PLATFORM is for large scale