Re: [webkit-dev] C++11 (was Re: on coding-style)

2013-04-14 Thread Sam Weinig
On Apr 13, 2013, at 1:55 AM, Carlos Garcia Campos carlo...@webkit.org wrote: El vie, 12-04-2013 a las 18:15 -0700, Maciej Stachowiak escribió: On Apr 12, 2013, at 4:09 PM, Karen Shaeffer shaef...@neuralscape.com wrote: Of course, I understand that. But there is a huge opportunity cost

Re: [webkit-dev] C++11 (was Re: on coding-style)

2013-04-13 Thread Carlos Garcia Campos
El vie, 12-04-2013 a las 18:15 -0700, Maciej Stachowiak escribió: On Apr 12, 2013, at 4:09 PM, Karen Shaeffer shaef...@neuralscape.com wrote: Of course, I understand that. But there is a huge opportunity cost to webkit. The c++11 standard also rewrites the entire standard library. I

[webkit-dev] C++11 (was Re: on coding-style)

2013-04-12 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Apr 12, 2013, at 4:09 PM, Karen Shaeffer shaef...@neuralscape.com wrote: Of course, I understand that. But there is a huge opportunity cost to webkit. The c++11 standard also rewrites the entire standard library. I have been using g++ 4.7.2 using -stdc++11 in my work with linux. And

Re: [webkit-dev] C++11 (was Re: on coding-style)

2013-04-12 Thread Benjamin Poulain
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On Apr 12, 2013, at 4:09 PM, Karen Shaeffer shaef...@neuralscape.com wrote: As others have said, we are definitely eager to use C++11 across the board but are limited by compiler support requirements. One thing that

Re: [webkit-dev] C++11 (was Re: on coding-style)

2013-04-12 Thread Roger Fong
From the CMake thread, I got that MSVC 2010 will soon be the oldest version supported. Is that correct? It looks like that might be the case although I still need to test cmake on the AppleWin port to confirm that’s it’s okay. Assuming that we do make use of cmake I’m still not quite sure

Re: [webkit-dev] C++11 (was Re: on coding-style)

2013-04-12 Thread Patrick Gansterer
Am 13.04.2013 um 03:22 schrieb Benjamin Poulain: On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On Apr 12, 2013, at 4:09 PM, Karen Shaeffer shaef...@neuralscape.com wrote: As others have said, we are definitely eager to use C++11 across the board but are limited