Thanks for the feedback thus far. I'm going to start working on some
of the changes I perceive as less controversial. Please feel free to
comment on bugs or reply to this thread if you have additional
thoughts. The meta bug for this work is
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68012.
Adam
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
>>
>> I've updated the spreadsheet of all ENABLE flags to match TOT (as of
>> this afternoon):
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AlC4tS7Ao1fIdHFVNUpFSDBudEF5WGM3WDNzQjI3Ync&
On Sep 15, 2011 12:56 AM, "Simon Hausmann" wrote:
>
> On Thursday, September 15, 2011 12:40:41 AM ext Adam Barth wrote:
> [...]
> > == Always Disable (Delete Code) ==
> >
> > ENABLE(ICONDATABASE) ???
>
> Hmm, I see Mac, Qt and EFL use the icon database in WebCore/loader/icon to
retrieve
> favicons
On Sep 15, 2011, at 3:25 AM, ext Adam Barth wrote:
> I wonder if we should combine all the flags that are disabled only to
> reduce binary size.
One thing that can be done, is to combine them in the build-bot level, like the
--minimal flag in build-webkit. Combining flags to something cryptic li
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
> I've updated the spreadsheet of all ENABLE flags to match TOT (as of
> this afternoon):
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AlC4tS7Ao1fIdHFVNUpFSDBudEF5WGM3WDNzQjI3Ync&authkey=CJCDiooK&hl=en_US#gid=0
>
> I've gone through the lis
I wonder if we should combine all the flags that are disabled only to
reduce binary size.
Adam
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Loïc Yhuel
wrote:
> Do we know what would be the code size increase due to enabling all these
> flags ?
> Library size can be a constraint on embedded systems.
>
> ENA
Do we know what would be the code size increase due to enabling all
these flags ?
Library size can be a constraint on embedded systems.
ENABLE(INSPECTOR) : On many embedded systems, it won't be used (except
during development), and would be blocked by the firewall or stubbed
for security reaso
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
>>
>> ENABLE(SVG_ANIMATION) => Gated on ENABLE(SVG)
>> ENABLE(SVG_AS_IMAGE) => Gated on ENABLE(SVG)
>> ENABLE(SVG_DOM_OBJC_BINDINGS) => Gated on ENABLE(SVG)
>> ENABLE(SVG_FONTS) => Gated on E
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
>
> ENABLE(SVG_ANIMATION) => Gated on ENABLE(SVG)
> ENABLE(SVG_AS_IMAGE) => Gated on ENABLE(SVG)
> ENABLE(SVG_DOM_OBJC_BINDINGS) => Gated on ENABLE(SVG)
> ENABLE(SVG_FONTS) => Gated on ENABLE(SVG)
>
I think Eric is planning to get rid of these fl
== Always Enable ==
>
> ENABLE(DETAILS) ???
> ENABLE(DOM_STORAGE)
> ENABLE(EVENTSOURCE)
> ENABLE(INSPECTOR) ???
> ENABLE(METER_TAG)
> ENABLE(OFFLINE_WEB_APPLICATIONS)
> ENABLE(PROGRESS_TAG)
> ENABLE(SVG_ANIMATION) => Gated on ENABLE(SVG)
> ENABLE(SVG_AS_IMAGE) => Gated on ENABLE(SVG)
> ENABLE(SVG_
I've updated the spreadsheet of all ENABLE flags to match TOT (as of
this afternoon):
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AlC4tS7Ao1fIdHFVNUpFSDBudEF5WGM3WDNzQjI3Ync&authkey=CJCDiooK&hl=en_US#gid=0
I've gone through the list and marked some of them that we might want
to change, listed be
11 matches
Mail list logo
