Re: [webkit-dev] Fixing the Platform fields in Bugzilla

2011-07-05 Thread Benjamin Poulain 
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Simon Fraser  wrote:

> These don't represent the suite of hardware and OSes that WebKit is used on
> these days, nor do they represent the various ports. For example, there's no
> way to indicate that a bug is in the QT port.
>
> Can we clean this up?
>

I agree the current fields are pretty much useless when filtering bugs.

Bugs sometimes affect multiple ports (Safari && Chromium Mac is quite
common), or multiple platforms.
I think two field allowing multiple selections: one for the port, one for
the platform, is the simplest solution and offer lots of flexibility.

If there is a dedicated field for the port, we can get rid of the port
specific components and add "WebKit API". That would be a nice improvement
for the component field. :)

cheers,
Benjamin
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

Re: [webkit-dev] Fixing the Platform fields in Bugzilla

2011-07-05 Thread Brent Fulgham 
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Christopher Marrin  wrote:
>
> Seems like it would be better to just have one field with the sum total of 
> all WebKit ports. I've seen plenty of combos like Macintosh PowerPC/Windows 
> 2000. How about:
>
> Unspecified (the default)
> Mac OSX 10.5
> Mac OSX 10.6
> Mac OSX 10.7
> Linux (any different flavors?)
> Windows XP
> Windows Vista
> Windows 7
> Windows 8
> iOS
> Android
> Gtk
> Qt
> Wx (Is there an active Wx port? There's a folder in WebCore/platform)
>
> Any others that are currently active?

There are also the WinCairo and WinCE ports.

-Brent
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

Re: [webkit-dev] Fixing the Platform fields in Bugzilla

2011-07-05 Thread Simon Fraser 
On Jul 5, 2011, at 11:26 AM, Christopher Marrin wrote:

> On Jul 5, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Adam Roben wrote:
> 
>> On Jul 5, 2011, at 12:41 PM, Simon Fraser wrote:
>> 
>>> Can we clean this up?
>> 
>> Definitely! It's easy to change the options for these two fields. I don't 
>> know what would be involved with replacing these two fields with something 
>> else entirely.
>> 
>> Do you have a proposal?
> 
> Seems like it would be better to just have one field with the sum total of 
> all WebKit ports. I've seen plenty of combos like Macintosh PowerPC/Windows 
> 2000. How about:
> 
> Unspecified (the default)
> Mac OSX 10.5
> Mac OSX 10.6
> Mac OSX 10.7
> Linux (any different flavors?)
> Windows XP
> Windows Vista
> Windows 7
> Windows 8
> iOS
> Android
> Gtk
> Qt
> Wx (Is there an active Wx port? There's a folder in WebCore/platform)

This conflates ports and platforms.

Simon

___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

Re: [webkit-dev] Fixing the Platform fields in Bugzilla

2011-07-05 Thread Christopher Marrin 

On Jul 5, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Adam Roben wrote:

> On Jul 5, 2011, at 12:41 PM, Simon Fraser wrote:
> 
>> Can we clean this up?
> 
> Definitely! It's easy to change the options for these two fields. I don't 
> know what would be involved with replacing these two fields with something 
> else entirely.
> 
> Do you have a proposal?

Seems like it would be better to just have one field with the sum total of all 
WebKit ports. I've seen plenty of combos like Macintosh PowerPC/Windows 2000. 
How about:

Unspecified (the default)
Mac OSX 10.5
Mac OSX 10.6
Mac OSX 10.7
Linux (any different flavors?)
Windows XP
Windows Vista
Windows 7
Windows 8
iOS
Android
Gtk
Qt
Wx (Is there an active Wx port? There's a folder in WebCore/platform)

Any others that are currently active?

___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

Re: [webkit-dev] Fixing the Platform fields in Bugzilla

2011-07-05 Thread Alexey Proskuryakov 

05.07.2011, в 10:21, Alexis Menard написал(а):

> Though the component field let you choose "WebKit Qt". That's how we
> catch our bugs :D and the keywords, Qt, QtTriaged.


Bugzilla description for this component says that this usage is incorrect: 
.

At this point, changing component description could be more practical that 
trying to align component usage with the original design. What do you think? 
This question certainly applies to all other port components, and doesn't 
necessarily need to have the same answer for all.

WebKit BREWMP   webkit-unassig...@lists.webkit.org
Bugs relating to the BREWMP WebKit API layer

WebKit EFL  webkit-unassig...@lists.webkit.org
Bugs relating to the EFL WebKit API layer

WebKit Gtk  webkit-unassig...@lists.webkit.org
Bugs related to the Gtk API layer.

WebKit Qt   webkit-unassig...@lists.webkit.org
Bugs in the WebKit Qt API layer.

WebKit wx   webkit-unassig...@lists.webkit.org
Bugs related to the wx API layer

WebKit2 webkit-unassig...@lists.webkit.org
Bugs relating to the WebKit2 API layer

- WBR, Alexey Proskuryakov

___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

Re: [webkit-dev] Fixing the Platform fields in Bugzilla

2011-07-05 Thread Alexis Menard 
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Simon Fraser  wrote:
> The platform fields in Bugzilla are pretty much useless now. There's a 
> "rep_platform" popup (replicated platform?) containing:
>
> Unspecified
> All
> Macintosh PowerPC
> Macintosh Intel
> PC
> S60 Hardware
> S60 Emulator
> Android
> Other
>
>  and an "op_sys" popup, both containing:
>
> Unspecified
> All
> Windows 2000
> Windows XP
> Windows Server 2003
> Windows Vista
> Windows 7
> Mac OS X 10.3
> Mac OS X 10.4
> Mac OS X 10.5
> Mac OS X 10.6
> Linux
> S60 3rd Edition
> Android
> Other
>
> These don't represent the suite of hardware and OSes that WebKit is used on 
> these days, nor do they represent the various ports. For example, there's no 
> way to indicate that a bug is in the QT port.

Though the component field let you choose "WebKit Qt". That's how we
catch our bugs :D and the keywords, Qt, QtTriaged.

>
> Can we clean this up?
>
> Simon
>
> ___
> webkit-dev mailing list
> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
>



-- 
Alexis Menard (darktears)
Software Engineer
INdT Recife Brazil
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

Re: [webkit-dev] Fixing the Platform fields in Bugzilla

2011-07-05 Thread Simon Fraser 
On Jul 5, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Adam Roben wrote:

> On Jul 5, 2011, at 12:41 PM, Simon Fraser wrote:
> 
>> Can we clean this up?
> 
> Definitely! It's easy to change the options for these two fields. I don't 
> know what would be involved with replacing these two fields with something 
> else entirely.
> 
> Do you have a proposal?

Source/WebCore/platform directories suggest we have the following ports

android
brew
chromium
efl
gtk
haiku
mac
qt
win
wince
wx

from which we should be able to derive a set of platforms.

Simon

___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

Re: [webkit-dev] Fixing the Platform fields in Bugzilla

2011-07-05 Thread Ryosuke Niwa 
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Simon Fraser  wrote:

> The platform fields in Bugzilla are pretty much useless now. There's a
> "rep_platform" popup (replicated platform?) containing:
>
> Unspecified
> All
> Macintosh PowerPC
> Macintosh Intel
> PC
> S60 Hardware
> S60 Emulator
> Android
> Other
>

I suggest we get rid of this field and replace it with "port".

 and an "op_sys" popup, both containing:
>
> Unspecified
> All
> Windows 2000
> Windows XP
> Windows Server 2003
> Windows Vista
> Windows 7
> Mac OS X 10.3
> Mac OS X 10.4
> Mac OS X 10.5
> Mac OS X 10.6
> Linux
> S60 3rd Edition
> Android
> Other
>

I personally find this field useful although it'll be nice to have plain
Windows and Mac OS X to indicate the bug always reproduces on Windows and
Mac respectively.

- Ryosuke
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

Re: [webkit-dev] Fixing the Platform fields in Bugzilla

2011-07-05 Thread Adam Roben 
On Jul 5, 2011, at 12:41 PM, Simon Fraser wrote:

> Can we clean this up?

Definitely! It's easy to change the options for these two fields. I don't know 
what would be involved with replacing these two fields with something else 
entirely.

Do you have a proposal?

-Adam

___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

[webkit-dev] Fixing the Platform fields in Bugzilla

2011-07-05 Thread Simon Fraser 
The platform fields in Bugzilla are pretty much useless now. There's a 
"rep_platform" popup (replicated platform?) containing:

Unspecified
All
Macintosh PowerPC
Macintosh Intel
PC
S60 Hardware
S60 Emulator
Android
Other

 and an "op_sys" popup, both containing:

Unspecified
All
Windows 2000
Windows XP
Windows Server 2003
Windows Vista
Windows 7
Mac OS X 10.3
Mac OS X 10.4
Mac OS X 10.5
Mac OS X 10.6
Linux
S60 3rd Edition
Android
Other

These don't represent the suite of hardware and OSes that WebKit is used on 
these days, nor do they represent the various ports. For example, there's no 
way to indicate that a bug is in the QT port.

Can we clean this up?

Simon

___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev