Hi,
The idea of a Options${PORT} file is to put only the port-specific
checks and defaults there.
When we now have a CMake buildsystem we can get rid of port-thinking. We
can switch to has-feature-thinking.
You should check for different features instead of doing sth for a spezial
port.
E.g.
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 5:50 AM, Patrick Roland Gansterer
par...@paroga.com wrote:
Hi,
The idea of a Options${PORT} file is to put only the port-specific
checks and defaults there.
When we now have a CMake buildsystem we can get rid of port-thinking. We
can switch to has-feature-thinking.
Patrick,
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Patrick Roland Gansterer
par...@paroga.com wrote:
(...) but there a some parts which are not good for a general buildsystem.
E.g. INCLUDE(Options${PORT}) doesn't support different ports well, since
ports share some parts. (There some other points too;
Just a friendly ping, if someone could help us get this merged, say
it. If you see a big blocker after my last comment, say it.
Meanwhile, Leandro is working on generic webkit option, to be more
generic than my initial {ADD,DEL}_FEATURE().
BR,
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Gustavo Sverzut
Hi all,
As some of you know, the EFL port is almost all merged, we just lack a
build system in SVN by now. We initially started with automake,
sharing with GTK, but it was quite slow and the Gtk guys had the
willing to get it clean before any changes were made, in order to
avoid it to get worse.
Bill, could you look over these CMake files and give it an informal review?
On Monday 03 May 2010 02:37:22 pm Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
Hi all,
As some of you know, the EFL port is almost all merged, we just lack a
build system in SVN by now. We initially started with automake,
Hi,
the file from Gustavo are mainly for the EFL port. It's not a general
buildsystem and some parts are not real CMake style in the moment.
I did some cleanup for the JavaScriptCore files already, but for the
WebCore and WebKit parts it is a bigger task.
As I already wrote at [1] I will help
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Patrick Roland Gansterer
par...@paroga.com wrote:
Hi,
the file from Gustavo are mainly for the EFL port. It's not a general
buildsystem and some parts are not real CMake style in the moment.
I did some cleanup for the JavaScriptCore files already, but for the
Hi,
On Mon, 3 May 2010 17:33:45 -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
Did you see this new version? Leandro did the work on top of yours.
However he removed the .h from the source list, he did it before he
read that it may be useful to get some IDE to show it. If
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Patrick Roland Gansterer
par...@paroga.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 3 May 2010 17:33:45 -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
Did you see this new version? Leandro did the work on top of yours.
However he removed the .h from the source
10 matches
Mail list logo
