Re: [webkit-dev] JavaScriptCore cleanup

2008-09-07 Thread Eric Seidel
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Eric Seidel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Yay for matching style!

 My vote is for JSC.

 -eric

 On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Cameron Zwarich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Now that SquirrelFish Extreme has landed, we should perform some of
 the cleanup that we've been itching to do for a while now. A few items
 immediately come to mind, but I am sure there are others:

 1) Directory reorganization. We should split the code into more
 logical units than kjs, pcre, wrec, and VM (which is also in capitals
 in violation of our style guidelines). Some things in the VM directory
 also don't really belong there. Sam and Maciej talked about this in
 detail in the past, and I think everyone is essentially in agreement
 about what to do, so we should do it in the next few days.

 2) Bringing all source files up to our coding style guidelines. Sam,
 myself, and others have been doing this bit by bit, but we should
 finish the job.

 3) Removing the KJS namespace. There are a few options:

 1) JavaScriptCore

 2) JSC

 3) JSCore

 4) SFX

 A lot of people feel that #1 is too long. I like #2, and think that
 #4. We should decide on something and carry out the change soon.

 Cameron
 ___
 webkit-dev mailing list
 webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
 http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev


___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev


Re: [webkit-dev] JavaScriptCore cleanup

2008-09-07 Thread Maciej Stachowiak

I like JSC or SFX or JSCore. JavaScriptCore is too long.

  - Maciej

On Sep 7, 2008, at 1:56 PM, Cameron Zwarich wrote:

 Now that SquirrelFish Extreme has landed, we should perform some of
 the cleanup that we've been itching to do for a while now. A few items
 immediately come to mind, but I am sure there are others:

 1) Directory reorganization. We should split the code into more
 logical units than kjs, pcre, wrec, and VM (which is also in capitals
 in violation of our style guidelines). Some things in the VM directory
 also don't really belong there. Sam and Maciej talked about this in
 detail in the past, and I think everyone is essentially in agreement
 about what to do, so we should do it in the next few days.

 2) Bringing all source files up to our coding style guidelines. Sam,
 myself, and others have been doing this bit by bit, but we should
 finish the job.

 3) Removing the KJS namespace. There are a few options:

 1) JavaScriptCore

 2) JSC

 3) JSCore

 4) SFX

 A lot of people feel that #1 is too long. I like #2, and think that
 #4. We should decide on something and carry out the change soon.

 Cameron
 ___
 webkit-dev mailing list
 webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
 http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev


Re: [webkit-dev] JavaScriptCore cleanup

2008-09-07 Thread David Hyatt
I like JSCore.

dave

On Sep 7, 2008, at 7:16 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:


 I like JSC or SFX or JSCore. JavaScriptCore is too long.

  - Maciej

 On Sep 7, 2008, at 1:56 PM, Cameron Zwarich wrote:

 Now that SquirrelFish Extreme has landed, we should perform some of
 the cleanup that we've been itching to do for a while now. A few  
 items
 immediately come to mind, but I am sure there are others:

 1) Directory reorganization. We should split the code into more
 logical units than kjs, pcre, wrec, and VM (which is also in capitals
 in violation of our style guidelines). Some things in the VM  
 directory
 also don't really belong there. Sam and Maciej talked about this in
 detail in the past, and I think everyone is essentially in agreement
 about what to do, so we should do it in the next few days.

 2) Bringing all source files up to our coding style guidelines. Sam,
 myself, and others have been doing this bit by bit, but we should
 finish the job.

 3) Removing the KJS namespace. There are a few options:

 1) JavaScriptCore

 2) JSC

 3) JSCore

 4) SFX

 A lot of people feel that #1 is too long. I like #2, and think that
 #4. We should decide on something and carry out the change soon.

 Cameron
 ___
 webkit-dev mailing list
 webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
 http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

 ___
 webkit-dev mailing list
 webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
 http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev


Re: [webkit-dev] JavaScriptCore cleanup

2008-09-07 Thread Sam Weinig
 like JSCore or JSC.  I prefer JSCore.
-Sam
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev


Re: [webkit-dev] JavaScriptCore cleanup

2008-09-07 Thread Dan Bernstein
JSCore++
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev


Re: [webkit-dev] JavaScriptCore cleanup

2008-09-07 Thread Maciej Stachowiak

On Sep 7, 2008, at 5:34 PM, Sam Weinig wrote:

  like JSCore or JSC.  I prefer JSCore.

I know I had JSCore on my list of ok names, but now that I think about  
it more I really don't like the half-abbreviation. And this namespace,  
unlike the WebCore namespace, is used quite a bit in code so short is  
good.

  - Maciej


 -Sam

___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev