Hi Mike,
On Feb 13, 2007, at 11:15 AM, Mike Emmel wrote:
On 2/13/07, Krzysztof Kowalczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/13/07, atul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We (me & shri) both have a worked on GTK+Webcore
> (http://gtk-webcore.sourceforge.net/ ) for sometime & as we are
new to
On 2/13/07, Krzysztof Kowalczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/13/07, atul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We (me & shri) both have a worked on GTK+Webcore
> (http://gtk-webcore.sourceforge.net/ ) for sometime & as we are new to
> the current WEBKIT ToT we need someone to guide/help us for
On 2/13/07, atul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We (me & shri) both have a worked on GTK+Webcore
(http://gtk-webcore.sourceforge.net/ ) for sometime & as we are new to
the current WEBKIT ToT we need someone to guide/help us for understand &
contribute to the latest Webkit For GDK port. This m
Great !
Some history on the port.
My initial plans for the port where to have it gdk only with all widgets in svg.
I am continuing to experiment with a fork of webkit that does not
depend on traditional
widget toolkits. The GDK port can easily be turned into a normal GTK port.
For use with GTK
Hii.
This is mail in regard of the GDK port Of Webkit.. It seems Qt Port for
Linux is quite well maintained but that's not same for GDK port. I & my
colleague Shri want to contribute for the GDK port of Webkit Which can
meet long needed demand of gnome users having a KHTML+GTK browser.
We
5 matches
Mail list logo