On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 2:42 AM, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen <
kenneth.christian...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nice, congratulations on getting this far! A lot of web developers are
> going to find flexbox extremely useful, and we should also not forget
> that it is even supported by IE10 (though prefixed
I'm not sure. A quick search through the codebase shows a bunch of
ENABLE_CSS_FLEXBOX=1. So, it looks like most, if not all ports have it
enabled on trunk.
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 2:53 AM, Eric Seidel wrote:
> Do we know what ports have CSS3_FLEXBOX enabled?
>
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 6:47 PM,
Do we know what ports have CSS3_FLEXBOX enabled?
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
> Next week we plan to remove the CSS3_FLEXBOX define again. We had added it
> back in because the spec was about to change a lot (mostly renaming). At
> this point the spec is stable and has been
Nice, congratulations on getting this far! A lot of web developers are
going to find flexbox extremely useful, and we should also not forget
that it is even supported by IE10 (though prefixed with -ms-) now, so
it will be good that people can also use it on WebKit based browsers
soon.
Kenneth
On
Next week we plan to remove the CSS3_FLEXBOX define again. We had added it
back in because the spec was about to change a lot (mostly renaming). At
this point the spec is stable and has been approved to go to CR.
Also, our implementation has been fuzz-tested for crashes/memory errors.
I'm fairly
5 matches
Mail list logo
