zaheer ahmad wrote:
hi,
can somebody suggest websites where we can see a considerable difference using LOW_BANDWIDTH_DISPLAY or the FOUC problem. i dont seem to see the difference with most links i have tried.

The WebKit FOUC with LOW_BANDWIDTH_DISPLAY is quite distracting to me both on the desktop and on mobile devices, so much so that I don't think it's even worth supporting as an official configure flag right now.

If you didn't notice it, the only possibility I can think of is that you passed the wrong CPPFLAGS. It needs to be precisely:

-DWTF_USE_LOW_BANDWIDTH_DISPLAY=1

So, if you are using the configure script and compiling for the Maemo mobile platform:

CPPFLAGS="-DMOBILE=1 -DWTF_USE_LOW_BANDWIDTH_DISPLAY=1" ./configure --prefix=/opt/webkit --enable-video --disable-xslt --with-hildon

I actually think a throbber or other load notification system is much more effective. When users see unstyled content (HTML without CSS), they immediately consider it a bug in the browser. Not good.

So in summary, -DMOBILE=1 is good, -DWTF_USE_LOW_BANDWIDTH_DISPLAY=1 is not so good. The loader in current builds is significantly faster and better at scheduling than those in other mobile browsers so I don't think we need hacks like this. Try it out and see what you think :-)
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

Reply via email to