Re: [webkit-dev] Service workers

[Brady Eidson]

> On Aug 3, 2017, at 12:14 AM, Yusuke SUZUKI  wrote:
> 
> I've just seen some of initial work about service workers[1,2].
> So, have we started experimenting with implementing service workers?

https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/220220/webkit 


Thanks,
~Brady

> [1]: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=175115 
> 
> [2]: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=175053 
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Yusuke Suzuki

___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

Re: [webkit-dev] Service workers

[Yusuke SUZUKI]

I've just seen some of initial work about service workers[1,2].
So, have we started experimenting with implementing service workers?

[1]: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=175115
[2]: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=175053

Best regards,
Yusuke Suzuki

On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 4:55 AM, Maciej Stachowiak  wrote:

>
>
> > On Jul 13, 2017, at 6:19 PM, Michael Catanzaro 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We've noticed that service worker support has more than once been a
> consideration for embedded device manufacturers when choosing between
> WebKit and Chromium for their products. I see the feature status for
> service workers is currently listed as "under consideration." Are there
> technical concerns with this spec? Is it something that would be desirable
> for WebKit?
>
> Apple engineers from the WebKit team have been heavily involved in
> ServiceWorkers spec discussions over the past few years. Many of our
> concerns with the spec have been addressed, especially for Fetch service
> workers which generally don't run beyond the scope of pages that use them.
> While we have not done any implementation work, the "under consideration"
> in this case is meant literally. We actually are considering it.
>
> More info about who's asking for it and what their use cases are would be
> useful, if you're free to share.
>
> Regards,
> Maciej
>
> ___
> webkit-dev mailing list
> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
>
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

Re: [webkit-dev] Service workers

[Maciej Stachowiak]

> On Jul 13, 2017, at 6:19 PM, Michael Catanzaro  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> We've noticed that service worker support has more than once been a 
> consideration for embedded device manufacturers when choosing between WebKit 
> and Chromium for their products. I see the feature status for service workers 
> is currently listed as "under consideration." Are there technical concerns 
> with this spec? Is it something that would be desirable for WebKit?

Apple engineers from the WebKit team have been heavily involved in 
ServiceWorkers spec discussions over the past few years. Many of our concerns 
with the spec have been addressed, especially for Fetch service workers which 
generally don't run beyond the scope of pages that use them. While we have not 
done any implementation work, the "under consideration" in this case is meant 
literally. We actually are considering it.

More info about who's asking for it and what their use cases are would be 
useful, if you're free to share.

Regards,
Maciej

___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

[webkit-dev] Service workers

[Michael Catanzaro]

Hi,

We've noticed that service worker support has more than once been a 
consideration for embedded device manufacturers when choosing between 
WebKit and Chromium for their products. I see the feature status for 
service workers is currently listed as "under consideration." Are there 
technical concerns with this spec? Is it something that would be 
desirable for WebKit?


Thanks,

Michael

___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev