Re: [webkit-dev] about webkit's license in chrome

2009-06-14 Thread David Jones
I carefully checked most of head license declaration per src file, and I think 
the reason of webkit is under 3 licenses simutaneously is due to webkit 
project's history.
 
The early KHTML,KJS developers of KDE used LGPL2, after Apple got webkit 
project, Apple's engineers used BSD license while retained the old LGPL2.
And now, some webkit commiters who don't work in Apple commit their codes with 
LGPL2.1.
 
Right?



The license is assigned on a per-file basis and can be found at the top of the 
file.


2009/6/12 David Jones ds...@163.com

well, is there a doc about that?
or, could you describe it more detailedly ? I want to know which part is under 
BSD, LGPL and so on.
I don't find a license illustration in webkit's src. 


On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:44:25PM -0700, Peter Kasting wrote:
 2009/6/11 David Jones ds...@163.com
 
  As listed in http://code.google.com/chromium/terms.html#3rdparty ,
  there're three different licenses of webkit in chrome:

  BSD http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php/LGPL 2/LGPL 
  21http://opensource.org/licenses/lgpl-2.1.php 

 
 
  Why?
 
 
 For the same reason the Mozilla code lists three licenses: because the code
 is tri-licensed.  It is offered simultaneously under three different
 licenses.

Technically, that is not true. While (most of) Mozilla code is
effectively tri-licensed, i.e released under the terms of the three
licences, WebKit code is partly licensed under each one, i.e. parts are
under 2-clause BSD, parts under 3-clause BSD, and parts under LGPL 2 or
2.1.

Mike




网易全新推出企业邮箱
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev



___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev


Re: [webkit-dev] about webkit's license in chrome

2009-06-13 Thread Jeremy Orlow
The license is assigned on a per-file basis and can be found at the top of
the file.

2009/6/12 David Jones ds...@163.com

 well, is there a doc about that?
 or, could you describe it more detailedly ? I want to know which part is
 under BSD, LGPL and so on.
 I don't find a license illustration in webkit's src.

 On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:44:25PM -0700, Peter Kasting wrote:
  2009/6/11 David Jones ds...@163.com
 
   As listed in http://code.google.com/chromium/terms.html#3rdparty ,
   there're three different licenses of webkit in chrome:
   BSD http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php/LGPL 2/LGPL
 21http://opensource.org/licenses/lgpl-2.1.php
  
  
   Why?
  
 
  For the same reason the Mozilla code lists three licenses: because the
 code
  is tri-licensed.  It is offered simultaneously under three different
  licenses.
 
 Technically, that is not true. While (most of) Mozilla code is
 effectively tri-licensed, i.e released under the terms of the three
 licences, WebKit code is partly licensed under each one, i.e. parts are
 under 2-clause BSD, parts under 3-clause BSD, and parts under LGPL 2 or
 2.1.
 
 Mike


 --
 网易全新推出企业邮箱 http://qiye.163.com/?ft=2
 ___
 webkit-dev mailing list
 webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
 http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev


___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev


Re: [webkit-dev] about webkit's license in chrome

2009-06-12 Thread David Jones
well, is there a doc about that?
or, could you describe it more detailedly ? I want to know which part is under 
BSD, LGPL and so on.
I don't find a license illustration in webkit's src.

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:44:25PM -0700, Peter Kasting wrote:
 2009/6/11 David Jones ds...@163.com
 
  As listed in http://code.google.com/chromium/terms.html#3rdparty ,
  there're three different licenses of webkit in chrome:
  BSD http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php/LGPL 2/LGPL 
  2.1http://opensource.org/licenses/lgpl-2.1.php
 
 
  Why?
 
 
 For the same reason the Mozilla code lists three licenses: because the code
 is tri-licensed.  It is offered simultaneously under three different
 licenses.

Technically, that is not true. While (most of) Mozilla code is
effectively tri-licensed, i.e. released under the terms of the three
licences, WebKit code is partly licensed under each one, i.e. parts are
under 2-clause BSD, parts under 3-clause BSD, and parts under LGPL 2 or
2.1.

Mike
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev


[webkit-dev] about webkit's license in chrome

2009-06-11 Thread David Jones
As listed in http://code.google.com/chromium/terms.html#3rdparty , 
there're three different licenses of webkit in chrome:
BSD/LGPL 2/LGPL 2.1 
 
Why? 
 
 

 ___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev


Re: [webkit-dev] about webkit's license in chrome

2009-06-11 Thread Peter Kasting
2009/6/11 David Jones ds...@163.com

 As listed in http://code.google.com/chromium/terms.html#3rdparty ,
 there're three different licenses of webkit in chrome:
 BSD http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php/LGPL 2/LGPL 
 2.1http://opensource.org/licenses/lgpl-2.1.php


 Why?


For the same reason the Mozilla code lists three licenses: because the code
is tri-licensed.  It is offered simultaneously under three different
licenses.

PK
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev


Re: [webkit-dev] about webkit's license in chrome

2009-06-11 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:44:25PM -0700, Peter Kasting wrote:
 2009/6/11 David Jones ds...@163.com
 
  As listed in http://code.google.com/chromium/terms.html#3rdparty ,
  there're three different licenses of webkit in chrome:
  BSD http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php/LGPL 2/LGPL 
  2.1http://opensource.org/licenses/lgpl-2.1.php
 
 
  Why?
 
 
 For the same reason the Mozilla code lists three licenses: because the code
 is tri-licensed.  It is offered simultaneously under three different
 licenses.

Technically, that is not true. While (most of) Mozilla code is
effectively tri-licensed, i.e. released under the terms of the three
licences, WebKit code is partly licensed under each one, i.e. parts are
under 2-clause BSD, parts under 3-clause BSD, and parts under LGPL 2 or
2.1.

Mike
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev