Re: [webkit-dev] starting implementation of postMessage tranferables

2011-09-22 Thread Ian Hickson
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Oliver Hunt wrote: > > There is not any substantive harm in prefixing, whereas there can be > real problems down the road if we don't prefix. The harm in prefixing is that people can't use the feature for years after it's implemented; q.v. CSS. -- Ian Hickson

Re: [webkit-dev] starting implementation of postMessage tranferables

2011-09-22 Thread Oliver Hunt
On Sep 22, 2011, at 7:46 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, David Levin wrote: >> >> *Summary*: Implementing postMessage with transferable support as >> webkitPostMessage. >> >> *Details*: >> *Spec*: >> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/comms.html#posting-me

Re: [webkit-dev] starting implementation of postMessage tranferables

2011-09-22 Thread Ian Hickson
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, David Levin wrote: > > *Summary*: Implementing postMessage with transferable support as > webkitPostMessage. > > *Details*: > *Spec*: > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/comms.html#posting-messages > > This describes window.postMessage and the same i

[webkit-dev] starting implementation of postMessage tranferables

2011-09-22 Thread David Levin
*Summary*: Implementing postMessage with transferable support as webkitPostMessage. *Details*: *Spec*: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/comms.html#posting-messages This describes window.postMessage and the same is true for Message Ports and Worker Context. It doesn't me