Any particular reason we aren't using js-test-pre and js-test-post harness
code in our http tests, other than the fact that it's additional http
resources loaded per test?
I could spend a year improving our current tests; they are completely fugly.
Thanks,
Jarred
Which tests are you referring to? I've certainly written HTTP tests that
use the JS test harness, e.g.,
http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/LayoutTests/http/tests/filesystem/resolve-uri.html.
Note the resources are in fact copied to a special '/js-test-resources/'
directory to make them
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Adam Klein ad...@chromium.org wrote:
Which tests are you referring to? I've certainly written HTTP tests that
use the JS test harness, e.g.,
http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/LayoutTests/http/tests/filesystem/resolve-uri.html.
Note the resources are in fact
Sorry for the upcoming flood of old webkit.org email. I'm tending to old
moderator requests.
- Adele
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
I am Sorry for my previous email. My internal signature was included in the
email.
Please ignore the signature.
Kent, do you make a bug for your suggestion ?
- gyuyoung
I think it's ok to keep WML code if we can avoid the form control issue.
We can terminate the form control abstraction
Hello Webkit Developers,
In parallel to the active support of WebKit EFL port, on behalf of Samsung
platform team,
I would like to announce that Samsung will make the best effort to build up
the WebKit2 EFL port.
Samsung wanna work with WebKit2 maintainers closely for the improvement of
WebKit2
bcc: both lists.
Please avoid cross-posting to such wide lists -- trust me, you don't
really want ensuing conversation insanity.
Also, build-webkit --chromium will produce the unit tests binary.
:DG
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Fady Samuel fsam...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi all,
I apologize
Hi, Jose.
Our team had implemented the remote debugging feature on our custom Android
port.
This[1] is a brief article about that.
I hope it helps you.
(It is under development, so you cannot get the code yet)
Thanks,
Young Han.
[1] http://dev.dorothybrowser.com/2011/07/27/131175732.html
Hello Eric,
As you may be aware of it, recently, many webkit efl contributors are
submitting EFL patches to Bugzilla.
So, In my opinion, it may be the time to have any system to share webkit efl
news with EFL developers.
Some significant patches need to be notified to all EFL developers, and
Hi, Jose.
Our team had implemented the remote debugging feature on our custom Android
port.
This[1] is a brief article about that.
I hope it will be helpful.
(It is under development, so you cannot get the code yet)
Regards,
Young Han.
[1]
Hi,
I am trying to load gmail.com from winLauncher but this page is not loaded.
but when I try to load google.com it's load successfully.
Is there any setting variable , I need to set? Please help me.
Thanks,
Moumita
___
webkit-dev mailing list
Hello Communities!
Welcome to the
recently launched W3C AR Community Group
http://www.w3.org/community/ar/
that is gathering the discussions
that we'll try to organize and forward to all the related Communities
that could be interested in a described objectives and Augmented Reality,
at a whole.
I spent some time trying to find it, but couldn't. This bugzilla seems to be
the only place we can get information at the moment.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662038
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Darin Fisher wrote:
19.12.2011, в 7:08, Jarred Nicholls написал(а):
I could spend a year improving our current tests; they are completely fugly.
Generally speaking, I think that it's not worth it making existing tests pretty
for the sake of prettiness or even consistency. It is very easy to lose some
intended
2011/12/19 Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org:
Generally speaking, I think that it's not worth it making existing tests
pretty for the sake of prettiness or even consistency. It is very easy to
lose some intended non-obvious properties of tests that way, as well as to
lose unintended testing.
Yes we certainly have many useless/broken tests in the repository.
Alexey is correct, that it's difficult to tell when a test is useless
however. :)
-eric
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Benjamin Poulain benja...@webkit.org wrote:
2011/12/19 Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org:
Generally
16 matches
Mail list logo