On Jan 12, 2007, at 6:36 AM, David D. Kilzer wrote:
Hi FredCK,
I'd recommend filing all of the bugs. That way if someone else
gets the notion to create a reduced test case or fix the bug,
that's less work you'll have to do in the long run!
Please do a cursory search for existing bugs
Hi Everyone,
The Safari Team at Apple gave official feedback on the W3C's proposed
new HTML and related Working Group charters: http://www.w3.org/
2006/11/HTML-WG-charter.html
I posted our feedback publicly here: http://webkit.org/blog/?p=89
I encourage those of you who work for W3C
On Feb 12, 2007, at 10:23 AM, Jean-Charles VERDIE wrote:
We have internally chosen CMake. We are going to release a modified
version of WebKit plus the whole build stuff in the next few weeks but
feel free to contact me to get additional information
When you release your port, are you
Hey George,
Thanks for sharing your concerns.
On Feb 16, 2007, at 10:29 PM, George Staikos wrote:
On 16-Feb-07, at 9:22 PM, Mike Emmel wrote:
Here is the link of what you have to go through to commit now.
http://webkit.org/coding/contributing.html
People wanting to do a new port are not
Hey everyone,
I was discussing editing client methods with George and Lars, and the
following came up. WebKit (on the mac at least) appears to re-
register undo items when you do an undo or redo action. See
WebEditorClient.mm (registerCommandForUndoOrRedo), and Editor.cpp
which calls
Since Krzysztof has been doing most of the work to maintain the
WebKit Gdk port, I'd like to defer to his opinion on this.
- Maciej
On Feb 23, 2007, at 2:58 PM, Krzysztof Kowalczyk wrote:
Speaking purely for myself, not the webkit team...
Fixing compilation issues due to refactoring
On Feb 25, 2007, at 3:32 AM, Nikolas Zimmermann wrote:
Hey Maciej,
Seems like there is rough consensus around this plan. So I filed bugs
to disable the experimental features for now:
http://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12883
And to do some kind of additional testing/review of the various
On Mar 2, 2007, at 11:27 AM, Nikolas Zimmermann wrote:
Hello WebKit fellows,
I've filed a master bug yesterday which fixes all currently
reported use
bugs (except one minor bug with use in a not showing cursor).
http://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12936
(not reviewed yet)
As Andreas
On Apr 4, 2007, at 6:54 AM, Rodrigo Melo wrote:
Hi, I'm interested work on it too. I've started reading something
about E4X and WebKit, and specially looking at JavaScriptCore code.
My first question was where I would start to code.
Although we've discussed E4X support, we're not entirely
On May 4, 2007, at 2:48 PM, Holger Freyther wrote:
Hey,
I adjusted, updated and improved my gcov scripts and let it run on
the WebKit repository. Leopard will probably have something more
visually appealing but for everyone not at Apple this http://
On May 4, 2007, at 3:45 PM, Holger Freyther wrote:
Am 04.05.2007 um 23:59 schrieb Maciej Stachowiak:
So is that of interest for anyone?
Looks awesome to me. I think we should get your scripts in the
repository and consider setting up a buildbot to eventually run
the tests in a gcov
From mozilla:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=jsfunfuzz
This is hot. Does anyone want to run this and report bugs? Jesse
Ruderman already reported these two:
http://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10878
http://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10880
But he said that he found
Hi everyone,
The WebKit tree has been locked down for stabilization for a long
time, and I think there is a desire to work on features and less
essential bug fixes. It would be bad to hold this up indefinitely as
stabilization continues. I propose we create a branch (tentative
name:
Hi Everyone,
I recently watched a video on the topic of preventing poisonous
people from hurting an open source project. One of the practices it
recommends for a large open source project is to have a mission
statement, so it's clear to everyone what is and isn't in scope for
the
My change to make Frames start with an empty document instead of
creating one on demand caused some regressions (mostly in areas of
the code that are not under automated test). I still think it is a
fundamentally sound change and I'll try to fix the open regressions
ASAP (hopefully I can
===
--- WebKitQt/ChangeLog (revision 21427)
+++ WebKitQt/ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+2007-05-12 Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+
+Reviewed by Rob Buis.
+
+- call Frame::init as needed - this prevents crashes but
pages don't appear.
+
+* Api
On May 12, 2007, at 7:59 AM, Holger Freyther wrote:
Am 12.05.2007 um 13:28 schrieb Holger Freyther:
Am 12.05.2007 um 12:32 schrieb Maciej Stachowiak:
I can't check this in right now because the SVN server is
temporarily out of disk, but this appears to mostly fix the Qt
build
On May 25, 2007, at 4:18 PM, David Hyatt wrote:
Augmenting contextual menus really has nothing to do with plug-ins,
so I'm not sure how the conversation ended up at plug-ins. :)
Changing context menus is getting more into the realm of extensions.
Yeah, I don't get how it got there
On May 25, 2007, at 4:07 PM, Nathan Duran wrote:
I'm on record as accepting of, but not agreeing with, this
argument ;)
Well it makes at least as much sense as the Contextual Menu Manager
API's
continued existence does :)
It strikes me as rather silly to protest giving free reign to
Hey Geoff,
On Jun 1, 2007, at 9:51 AM, Geoffrey Garen wrote:
Hi Luciano.
I've found that the required exports from JavaScriptCore change all
the time based on new functionality in WebCore or architectural
changes in JavaScriptCore. I think that kind of documentation could
quickly get
On Jun 6, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Andre-John Mas wrote:
Hi,
I have heard that the W3C was working on a specification known
as 'Web Forms 2.0'. Does anyone know what the status of this is
and whether there are any moves to incorporate this into
WebKit or any other mainline rendering engine?
The
On Jun 7, 2007, at 6:27 AM, Nicholas Shanks wrote:
It has been mentioned on the Safari WebKit development mailing list
that a HTTP header which specified a document's target resolution
would be useful to allow clients to negotiate for high-res or low-
res artwork and CSS referring to such
On Jun 7, 2007, at 9:00 AM, Nicholas Shanks wrote:
Sorry,
Accept-Content: text/css, text/dsssl, text/xsl
should of course have referred to Accept-Type :-)
Actually it should have been Accept:. There is no Accept-Type header.
- Maciej
___
On Jun 12, 2007, at 2:33 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
I think we'll have to rethink this. ResourceHandle is intended to
be a low level networking layer, and so it doesn't make sense to
have higher level concepts like a Frame*, but clearly we'll need to
make a design change so there's a higher
On Jun 12, 2007, at 5:22 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Jun 12, 2007, at 2:33 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
I think we'll have to rethink this. ResourceHandle is intended to
be a low level networking layer, and so it doesn't make sense to
have higher level concepts like a Frame*, but clearly
On Jun 12, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Morgan L wrote:
--- Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 12, 2007, at 5:22 PM, Maciej Stachowiak
wrote:
On Jun 12, 2007, at 2:33 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
I think we'll have to rethink this.
ResourceHandle is intended to
be a low level
On Jun 26, 2007, at 10:29 AM, Christopher Allen wrote:
Geoffrey Garen wrote:
From code inspection, I see that XMLHttpRequest updates responseText
every time it receives data.
Perhaps you're seeing the results of slightly different networking
implementations. For example, you might need to
Hello,
On Jun 29, 2007, at 5:00 PM, Double-Dee Zee wrote:
Somebody out there must be using Spinneret, can you please help?
Is Spinneret now defunct? If yes, then why was that Win32 build
issue resolved just 10 days ago? Is someone successfully using
Spinneret with the new Win32 build?
On Jul 3, 2007, at 1:51 PM, Andrew Murphy wrote:
Hello.
This is my first time posting here, though I have lurked for a few
days, so I think that my question is on topic for this list.
Please let me know if it isn't. :)
I'm wondering if there's any way in Web Kit to access a page's DOM
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Maciej
Stachowiak
Sent: July 3, 2007 5:16 PM
To: Darin Adler
Cc: webkit-dev Development
Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Accessing Web Kit DOM properties via
Javascript
On Jul 3, 2007, at 2:10 PM, Darin Adler wrote
On Jul 17, 2007, at 9:49 AM, Paul Bakker wrote:
Hi,
Trying to download and install WebKit, following the instructions at http://webkit.org/building/tools.html
, but am running into the following:
First I downloaded the tar file with sourcecode, but unzipping it
gave errors in my McAffee
On Jul 19, 2007, at 11:21 AM, Andre-John Mas wrote:
Let's try this again, this time with the text:
I have a server in my domain called 'chat' and have a Tomcat server
running
there on port 8081. On that Tomcat server I have web application the
provides
an RSS feed. The URL I normally use
Hi Jean-Charles,
On Jul 20, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Jean-Charles VERDIE (Pleyo) wrote:
Dear Webkitters,
Pleyo, by my voice and others such as Max or Sebastien, has been
talking here now and then about the future outcome of its own
refactored version of WebKit, based on a specific Abstraction
On Jul 24, 2007, at 4:04 PM, Sam Carleton wrote:
Folks,
I have already written a kiosk browser for Windows using the
WebControl (IE6 or IE7), but I need a cross platform browser and would
prefer to use Safari rather then Firefox. Is it possible to use
webkit on windows? Is there an open
I sent this a while ago with not much comment. Any thoughts? Should I
post this on webkit.org somewhere?
- Maciej
On May 10, 2007, at 3:34 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I recently watched a video on the topic of preventing poisonous
people from hurting an open source
Hi Allan,
I've forwarded your comments and those of others internally at Apple.
I won't do #2 for moment. I'd still appreciate any other input on this
point.
Regards,
Maciej
On Jul 24, 2007, at 11:05 PM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 01:51, Maciej Stachowiak
On Jul 25, 2007, at 1:02 PM, Patrick Hanna wrote:
I am running into a segmentation fault in
Collector::collectOnMainThreadOnly on the line that reads:
cellBlock(cell)-collectOnMainThreadOnly.set(cellOffset(cell));
I believe that the reason is because the address passed in as
'value' is
On Jul 27, 2007, at 11:59 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
We were really following ICU's lead here -- ICU being another low
level library not built on top of a framework like Qt or AppKit.
I do see that. In Qt, although we have lot's of the same
functionality as ICU built in, we chose a
On Jul 28, 2007, at 3:52 AM, Lars Knoll wrote:
On Saturday 28 July 2007 00:26:19 Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Jul 27, 2007, at 11:36 AM, Lars Knoll wrote:
Other organizations have requested the ability to use other XML
parsers as well, such as expat. Seems like in the long run we want
On Aug 4, 2007, at 6:26 PM, Boyd Waters wrote:
Everyone saw the post about the JavaScript fuzzing tool released by
Mozilla developers this week:
http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2007/08/02/javascript-fuzzer-available/
http://www.squarefree.com/2007/08/02/introducing-jsfunfuzz/
On Aug 16, 2007, at 11:20 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
Hi,
When a change like [1] occurs, does it mean the current tree is
released as version 523.2 or that the previous revision was the
release of 523.1 ?
These version numbers in the .xcodeproj files are an Apple-internal
versioning scheme.
On Aug 19, 2007, at 9:08 AM, David D. Kilzer wrote:
Hi David,
I would guess that you should start looking in
RenderObject::paintBoxShadow()
and RenderObject::drawBorderArc(), although I'm not a rendering
expert. (Maybe
I will be after reading Hyatt's blog postings!)
paintBoxShadow is
On Aug 21, 2007, at 5:21 PM, David D. Kilzer wrote:
Please file a bug using http://bugreport.apple.com/. If you don't
have an
ADC account, please create a free online account using
http://connect.apple.com/.
Also, please provide the Radar bug number in a reply once you've
filed it.
On Aug 21, 2007, at 10:38 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 03:48:49PM -0700, Anyang Ren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
r24862 added an unused variable shouldDumpSubframesAsText
to DumpRenderTree.m:
Speaking of unused variable, here is a list of warnings I got while
building the Qt
On Aug 31, 2007, at 2:24 PM, Anyang Ren wrote:
In kjs_window.cpp, Window::isSafeScript(ExecState *exec), we have:
KURL actURL = activeFrame-loader()-url();
WebCore::String actDomain = actURL.host();
...
KURL thisURL = frame-loader()-url();
...
WebCore::String thisDomain =
On Sep 19, 2007, at 10:14 AM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
Pardon? Path provides the abstraction for the path implementation of
each platform's graphic library (eg. CoreGraphics, Qt, and Cairo).
So we have to have a Path class if we want to be able to draw paths.
Specifically it wraps a bezier
On Sep 21, 2007, at 8:09 AM, David D. Kilzer wrote:
WebKit supports multipart/x-mixed-replace as long as the content
type doesn't
change (14149) or as long as it's not used through an XMLHttpRequest
(14392):
http://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14149
Oliver (with a bit of help from Eric and others) has gotten the
rebased feature-branch reasonably solid. There are still some SVG
issues, but it's all clear for other patches.
Regards,
Maciej
___
webkit-dev mailing list
, 2007, at 3:47 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
Create branches/safari-3-branch/ from trunk/.
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
On Oct 10, 2007, at 4:46 PM, Timothy Hatcher wrote:
Might I suggest Safari-3-branch then? All of our other branches have
a capital Safari.
Capital S sounds good to me.
On Oct 10, 2007, at 4:24 PM, Matt Lilek wrote:
Perhaps safari-3-branch could be named safari-3-apple and then
have an
On Oct 29, 2007, at 11:30 PM, George Staikos wrote:
On 30-Oct-07, at 2:22 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
Below is a document I have written up describing the webkit port
that our team want to build. We’d like to know what the community
thinks of
the port we are proposing.
Sounds
On Oct 29, 2007, at 10:58 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All
Below is a document I have written up describing the webkit port
that our team want to build. We’d like to know what the community
thinks of
the port we are proposing.
Sounds like a neat idea. Keep in mind that Safari
On Nov 3, 2007, at 1:31 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 08:34:21PM -0700, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'd like to change the license terms for the contents of
JavaScriptCore/wtf
from LGPL to Apple modified BSD, except for the copy of Google's
TCMalloc
On Nov 3, 2007, at 1:20 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 08:34:21PM -0700, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'd like to change the license terms for the contents of
JavaScriptCore/wtf
from LGPL to Apple modified BSD, except for the copy of Google's
TCMalloc
On Nov 9, 2007, at 10:47 AM, Philippe Kalaf wrote:
Hi guys,
I created a new wiki page at :
https://svn.macosforge.org/projects/webkit/wiki/SpecSupport.
The point is to track the specs that are currently supported or not.
For
the specs that are being worked on (partially supported), we
On Nov 9, 2007, at 5:55 PM, Rob Burns wrote:
Hello all,
I have to say I like Philippe's version of the page better. I think
it is more appropriate for an open source project like webkit. I
would agree with Maciej that the word stable might be more
appropriate than full. However, I think
On Nov 12, 2007, at 5:28 AM, Mark Rowe wrote:
On 13/11/2007, at 00:00, Charles Woloszynski wrote:
I am working on a port of WebKit on Qt to a PowerPC platform.
Please make sure that we don't break the Qt port in this switch. I
am comfortable with autotools, so that is not a big deal
On Nov 12, 2007, at 1:26 PM, Timothy Hatcher wrote:
We could add a script that would add/remove/rename files in all the
project files for the various build systems.
Yeah, that's what I had in mind, more than a meta-build-system. If we
had that, it would remove 90% of the pain of multiple
On Nov 12, 2007, at 3:03 AM, Jean-Charles VERDIE (Pleyo) wrote:
Dear webkit stakeholders
Back in july, Pleyo announced a new port of Webkit, not onto a
specific platform but over an Abstraction Layer that we called OwBAL
and which lets us address specific needs which do not perfectly fit
On Nov 23, 2007, at 9:31 AM, Alp Toker wrote:
http://trac.webkit.org/projects/webkit/wiki/ProjectVision?action=diffversion=1
Please revert this change until the topic has been discussed on the
mailing list or bug tracker. You can't just make up a project vision
like that.
I don't think
On Nov 24, 2007, at 8:10 PM, Alp Toker wrote:
We've started re-modelling the WebKit/GTK+ public API on the WebKit
Objective-C API, since it's closer to GTK+ conventions than our
existing API (eg. WebView vs Page).
Going through the headers and documentation, I sometimes notice
concepts
On Nov 25, 2007, at 12:34 PM, Lars Knoll wrote:
I would prefer a discussion on the mailing list. I think it's
important that
everyone contributing to the project can state it's opinion and hear
all
arguments.
Sounds good to me.
Here's some parts I can comment on briefly:
Commit and
In the spirit of greater openness, here are some of the general areas
where Apple is interested in improvement in the near to mid term, in
no particular order:
- Major JavaScript performance improvements. JavaScriptCore improved a
lot since the Safari-3-stable branch; we think this is an
On Nov 29, 2007, at 12:17 PM, Robert Błaut wrote:
On 11/29/07, Adam Roben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey everyone-
I'm starting to work on setting up a blog aggregator at
http://planet.webkit.org/ and am looking for a set of blogs to
seed it
with. If you have a blog that you'd like included,
On Nov 29, 2007, at 3:16 PM, Nicholas Shanks wrote:
On 29 Nov 2007, at 10:56, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
We may post more details about some of these soon. I'm curious what
is of interest to other WebKit contributors. I'm especially
interested in areas where particular organizations
On Nov 30, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Rob Napier wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 8:59 PM, Nicholas Shanks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 30 Nov 2007, at 00:27, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
• Ability to right-click on an element and remove it from flow
(probably by adding a display: none attribute; so the DOM
See announcement here:
http://webkit.org/blog/146/new-open-committer-and-reviewer-policy/
And document here: http://webkit.org/coding/commit-review-policy.html
We'll try to get mailing lists for reviewers and committers set up as
fast as possible and would like to use this community-driven
On Dec 7, 2007, at 8:53 AM, Antoine Quint wrote:
Hi,
On 7 déc. 07, at 17:38, David Hyatt wrote:
Yeah, they don't seem particularly compelling to me either.
If someone does implement these, they should put the implementation
behind an #ifdef so that those projects that aren't interested
Getting marginally off-topic for webkit-dev, but I don't mind having a
bit of general web standards discussion here...
On Dec 8, 2007, at 8:05 AM, Antoine Quint wrote:
On 8 déc. 07, at 01:14, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Antoine Quint wrote:
XML Events basically come in handy
On Dec 7, 2007, at 7:02 PM, Raj Kiran Talusani wrote:
Guys,
thanks very much for all the comments. let me be more specific about
my problem.
i want to add multimodal capabilities to the webkit. I want to
trigger (or communicate with) an external app based on events
happening in the
Mostly sounds good.
On Dec 18, 2007, at 10:51 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
The WebCore::String class needs some work. I have some plans to
improve it. Here's an outline of what I have in mind.
immutability
- eliminate all non-const functions from StringImpl; fixes tricky
sharing semantics
-
On Jan 14, 2008, at 3:48 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear WebKit Team,
Going back to the original topic (Pulling together on WebKit
Mobile)
Wake3 has a working version of WebKit for Windows Mobile. We
definitely
want to contribute back to the community. We posted earlier about
On Jan 14, 2008, at 8:02 PM, Adam Roben wrote:
Oliver Hunt wrote:
On 14/01/2008, at 4:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The best and easiest way to discuss this would be on IRC in the
#webkit channel of
freenode...
Sure, but it seems tough to get a time when everyone interested is
on.
On Jan 21, 2008, at 10:35 PM, ledwinka wrote:
During my work on porting s60 webcore to wince, I found there is a
css bug
in render_style.h file, here is the struct define
You're probably better off basing a port on something more recent
(like trunk or the Safari 3 branch) since many
Jeff Walden mentioned on IRC that some of the tests mentioned below
fail in WebKit TOT and seem to show cross-domain postMessage not
working (I suspect it's failing security checks for some unrelated
reason). Can someone (ideally someone who understands postMessage)
please try these? I'm
Hi Eric,
On Jan 29, 2008, at 4:34 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
Hixie is nearly done with his Acid3 test. He's said he has space
for 2 more tests, but is otherwise ready.
Acid3 has certainly found some bugs in WebKit. WebKit has also
found bugs in Acid3 (I'm sure we'll find more).
Thanks
On Feb 2, 2008, at 4:23 AM, ankush tiwari wrote:
Hi All,
Is there any plan of making webkit render pages incrementally for
better performance?
WebKit does render incrementally, although normally pending scripts
block parsing and pending stylesheets block layout and painting until
a
On Feb 2, 2008, at 3:09 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
That sounds like one vote for renaming that file.
BidirectionalTextLayout.cpp :)
Or maybe BidirectionalWordSorting or similar. Mitz and Hyatt are
two of very few to ever have hacked on that file.
bidi is a pretty common term of art. Also,
Hi Eric,
On Jan 23, 2008, at 11:50 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
I'd like to get some clarification from other members of the WebKit
project, regarding the policy regarding having features on/off on
trunk. Specifically Apple folks, since they are the largest single
vendor actively contributing
On Feb 21, 2008, at 5:37 AM, Tor Arne Vestbø wrote:
Hi,
First of all, this is my first post to the webkit-dev list, so hi
everyone! :)
Now...we would like to provide values for text drag delay and
hysteresis
based on Qt defaults. What would be the preferred way of abstracting
this?
On Feb 25, 2008, at 11:31 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
I think WebKit should consider participating in Google's Summer of
Code this year.
To facilitate such, I have created a wiki page, where potential
mentors, as well as project ideas can be placed:
On Mar 11, 2008, at 4:22 AM, Martin Kerz wrote:
Hi,
some time ago I filed a bug concerning the compatibility hitlist (
http://webkit.org/projects/compat/hitlist.html
)
It's completely outdated. As I see it, it should either be removed,
because people can get the impression that
On Mar 12, 2008, at 4:57 PM, ToolmakerSteve wrote:
Akos Kiss-2 wrote:
we got interested in speeding up the
JavaScript engine of WebKit.
But, But, the world is moving on to ECMAScript 4 / Javascript 2.
Does it
make sense to do anything other than to use, and to help improve,
the open
On Mar 18, 2008, at 5:44 PM, Richard Bailey wrote:
I've been reading through the code and seem to be missing how I can
activate JSConsole.
It is functioning, or disabled in current webkit?
If you use Safari 3.1 with a WebKit nightly, the Web Inspector's
console will be used as the JS
On Apr 15, 2008, at 12:25 AM, Artem Ananiev wrote:
Hi,
is there any way to find the content type of the Document? I see two
methods - doctype() and realDocType() - in WebCore::Document,
however they always return NULL (at least for HTML documents)...
These would give the doctype
Hi Mark,
On Apr 16, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Mark Pauley wrote:
The bug is in the php tool, not in webkit. From the RFC (rfc1341 http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc1341/7_2_Multipart.html)
:
boundary := 0*69bchars bcharsnospace
bchars := bcharsnospace /
bcharsnospace :=DIGIT / ALPHA / ' / (
On May 9, 2008, at 8:50 AM, Scott Schmitz wrote:
I have a web application that makes extensive use of xmlhttprequest
(AJAX). I have optimized these GET requests such that the server
will return a 304 not modified if the ETag matches up from a prior
request. That way, if the browser
On May 13, 2008, at 5:08 AM, Johan Lund wrote:
Is there something equivalent to -moz-user-focus in webkit?
In WebKit trunk, you can use the tabIndex attribute on any element to
add focusability, but I do not think there is a way through CSS, or a
way to remove focusability.
Regards,
On May 14, 2008, at 11:17 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
Does it make sense to integrate the postMessage changes to the
Safari-3-1-branch? The concern is that someone shipping a port might
ENABLE(CROSS_DOCUMENT_MESSAGING) and get a significantly out-of-spec
implementation. Another option is to rip
Hi Everyone,
Over the past few weeks, a few of us have been working on a major
reworking of the JavaScriptCore interpreter, code named
SquirrelFish. This work has been done mainly by Geoff Garen, Oliver
Hunt and Cameron Zwarich, with help from myself, Sam Weinig, and
occasional others.
On May 21, 2008, at 12:55 AM, Andrei Maxim wrote:
Hi all,
I've been working with the latest WebKit mostly because of its ACID 3
compliance (I'm treating it as the standard rendering of the web pages
I work on and then adding fixes, where required, for more popular
browsers), but I'd like
On May 18, 2008, at 5:09 PM, Sylvain Pasche wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on an experimental project to build a set of cross browser
automated tests. The idea would be: having a repository of browser
independent automated tests. Each browser developer could contribute
tests to it and use these
On May 30, 2008, at 12:15 PM, James Turner wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:13:43PM -0700, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On May 30, 2008, at 10:37 AM, James Turner wrote:
I've spent the last couple days trying to compile WebKit on OpenBSD
-current. After adding the signbit function, changing
On May 30, 2008, at 1:51 PM, James Turner wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:22:54PM -0700, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On May 30, 2008, at 12:15 PM, James Turner wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:13:43PM -0700, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On May 30, 2008, at 10:37 AM, James Turner wrote:
I've
On Jun 3, 2008, at 10:58 PM, Paul Pedriana wrote:
Thanks for the response. I'm sorry, and perhaps I misunderstand, but
I believe your statement about inline operator new is incorrect.
Unless I misunderstand you, what you say is not supported by any
existing compiler nor is it supported by
Hi Chris,
On Jun 4, 2008, at 2:37 PM, Chris Brichford wrote:
I have two clever ideas, which might be bad ones, that would not
involve massive changes to the existing code:
Interesting ideas. It appears that both of these would impost runtime
cost (since calls to allocator-related
Now that SquirrelFish has landed, I'd like to take a look at
reorganizing JavaScriptCore's files and directories a bit.
JavaScriptCore has the following subdirectories:
API/
VM/
docs/
icu/
kjs/
os-win32/
pcre/
profiler/
tests/
wtf/
I see a few issues in this organization:
1) API and VM are
These renames all sound good to me.
On Jun 13, 2008, at 3:44 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
Change some filenames and header guards:
property_slot = PropertySlot,
scope_chain = ScopeChain,
scope_chain_mark = ScopeChainMark,
KJS_PROPERTY_SLOT_H = PropertySlot_h,
On Jun 14, 2008, at 10:26 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
On Jun 13, 2008, at 3:51 PM, Geoffrey Garen wrote:
Cut down on confusing uses of Object and Imp.
Should we add the JS prefix to these, too?
I'm not sure.
If we want to add a JS prefix to all these names, then there'd be even
more names
On Jun 14, 2008, at 10:39 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
On Jun 14, 2008, at 10:36 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
I would prefer if we keep a JS prefix only on the objects that seem
like very generic names otherwise.
Makes sense.
Given that rule of thumb, what do you think
1 - 100 of 1391 matches
Mail list logo
